Cargando…

The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT

BACKGROUND: To examine the impact of multimodal (MMS) and ultrasound (USS) screening on the sexual activity and functioning of 22 966 women in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) RCT. METHODS: Fallowfield's Sexual Activity Questionnaire (FSAQ) was completed prior to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fallowfield, Lesley, Solis-Trapala, Ivonne, Menon, Usha, Langridge, Carolyn, May, Shirley, Jacobs, Ian, Jenkins, Valerie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.72
_version_ 1783230009078448128
author Fallowfield, Lesley
Solis-Trapala, Ivonne
Menon, Usha
Langridge, Carolyn
May, Shirley
Jacobs, Ian
Jenkins, Valerie
author_facet Fallowfield, Lesley
Solis-Trapala, Ivonne
Menon, Usha
Langridge, Carolyn
May, Shirley
Jacobs, Ian
Jenkins, Valerie
author_sort Fallowfield, Lesley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To examine the impact of multimodal (MMS) and ultrasound (USS) screening on the sexual activity and functioning of 22 966 women in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) RCT. METHODS: Fallowfield's Sexual Activity Questionnaire (FSAQ) was completed prior to randomisation, then annually in a random sample (RS) of women from MMS, USS and control groups. Any women in the study who required repeat screening due to unsatisfactory results formed an Events Sample (ES); they completed questionnaires following an event and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Over time in the RS (n=1339) there was no difference between the MMS and USS groups in sexual activity compared with controls. In the ES there were significant differences between the USS group (n=10 156) and the MMS group (n=12 810). The USS group had lower pleasure scores (mean difference=−0.14, P=0.046). For both groups women who had ⩾2 repeat screens, showed a decrease in mean pleasure scores compared with their annual scores (mean difference=−0.16, P=0.005). Similarly mean pleasure scores decreased following more intensive screens compared with annual screening (mean difference=−0.09, P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian cancer screening did not affect sexual activity and functioning unless a woman had abnormal results and underwent repeated or higher level screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5396121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53961212018-04-11 The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT Fallowfield, Lesley Solis-Trapala, Ivonne Menon, Usha Langridge, Carolyn May, Shirley Jacobs, Ian Jenkins, Valerie Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: To examine the impact of multimodal (MMS) and ultrasound (USS) screening on the sexual activity and functioning of 22 966 women in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) RCT. METHODS: Fallowfield's Sexual Activity Questionnaire (FSAQ) was completed prior to randomisation, then annually in a random sample (RS) of women from MMS, USS and control groups. Any women in the study who required repeat screening due to unsatisfactory results formed an Events Sample (ES); they completed questionnaires following an event and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Over time in the RS (n=1339) there was no difference between the MMS and USS groups in sexual activity compared with controls. In the ES there were significant differences between the USS group (n=10 156) and the MMS group (n=12 810). The USS group had lower pleasure scores (mean difference=−0.14, P=0.046). For both groups women who had ⩾2 repeat screens, showed a decrease in mean pleasure scores compared with their annual scores (mean difference=−0.16, P=0.005). Similarly mean pleasure scores decreased following more intensive screens compared with annual screening (mean difference=−0.09, P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian cancer screening did not affect sexual activity and functioning unless a woman had abnormal results and underwent repeated or higher level screening. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-11 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5396121/ /pubmed/28324886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.72 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Fallowfield, Lesley
Solis-Trapala, Ivonne
Menon, Usha
Langridge, Carolyn
May, Shirley
Jacobs, Ian
Jenkins, Valerie
The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title_full The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title_fullStr The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title_full_unstemmed The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title_short The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT
title_sort effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the uk collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening rct
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.72
work_keys_str_mv AT fallowfieldlesley theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT solistrapalaivonne theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT menonusha theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT langridgecarolyn theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT mayshirley theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT jacobsian theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT jenkinsvalerie theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT theeffectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT fallowfieldlesley effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT solistrapalaivonne effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT menonusha effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT langridgecarolyn effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT mayshirley effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT jacobsian effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT jenkinsvalerie effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct
AT effectofovariancancerscreeningonsexualactivityandfunctioningresultsfromtheukcollaborativetrialofovariancancerscreeningrct