Cargando…
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469301 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414 |
_version_ | 1783230061675020288 |
---|---|
author | Bansal, Somendra Gupta, Narmada P. Yadav, Rajiv Khera, Rakesh Ahlawat, Kulbir Gautam, Dheeraj Ahlawat, Rajesh Gautam, Gagan |
author_facet | Bansal, Somendra Gupta, Narmada P. Yadav, Rajiv Khera, Rakesh Ahlawat, Kulbir Gautam, Dheeraj Ahlawat, Rajesh Gautam, Gagan |
author_sort | Bansal, Somendra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially improve cancer detection by better visualization and targeting of cancer focus. We evaluated the role of fusion biopsy in detection of prostate cancer and the association of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score for predicting cancer risk and its aggression. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive men with suspected prostate cancer underwent MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and standard 12 core biopsy from May 2014 to July 2015 in our institution. All patients underwent 3.0 T multiparametric MRI before biopsy. mp-MRI included T2W, DWI, DCE and MRS sequences to identify lesions suspicious for prostate cancer. Suspected lesions were scored according to PI-RADS scoring system. Comparison of cancer detection between standard 12 core biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was done. Detection of prostate cancer was primary end point of this study. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. Prostate cancer was detected in 57 patients (59.3%). Of these 57 patients, 8 patients (14%) were detected by standard 12 core biopsy only, 7 patients (12.3%) with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy only, and 42 patients (73.7%) by both techniques. Of the 7 patients, detected with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy alone, 6 patients (85.7%) had Gleason ≥7 disease. Prostate cancer was detected on either standard 12 core biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in 0%, 42.8%, 74%, and 89.3% patients of suspicious lesions of highest PI-RADS score 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy improves cancer detection rate when combined with standard 12 cores biopsy and detects more intermediate or high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason ≥7). With increasing PI-RADS score, there is an increase chance of detection of cancer as well as its aggressiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5396401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53964012017-05-03 Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study Bansal, Somendra Gupta, Narmada P. Yadav, Rajiv Khera, Rakesh Ahlawat, Kulbir Gautam, Dheeraj Ahlawat, Rajesh Gautam, Gagan Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially improve cancer detection by better visualization and targeting of cancer focus. We evaluated the role of fusion biopsy in detection of prostate cancer and the association of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score for predicting cancer risk and its aggression. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive men with suspected prostate cancer underwent MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and standard 12 core biopsy from May 2014 to July 2015 in our institution. All patients underwent 3.0 T multiparametric MRI before biopsy. mp-MRI included T2W, DWI, DCE and MRS sequences to identify lesions suspicious for prostate cancer. Suspected lesions were scored according to PI-RADS scoring system. Comparison of cancer detection between standard 12 core biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was done. Detection of prostate cancer was primary end point of this study. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. Prostate cancer was detected in 57 patients (59.3%). Of these 57 patients, 8 patients (14%) were detected by standard 12 core biopsy only, 7 patients (12.3%) with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy only, and 42 patients (73.7%) by both techniques. Of the 7 patients, detected with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy alone, 6 patients (85.7%) had Gleason ≥7 disease. Prostate cancer was detected on either standard 12 core biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in 0%, 42.8%, 74%, and 89.3% patients of suspicious lesions of highest PI-RADS score 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy improves cancer detection rate when combined with standard 12 cores biopsy and detects more intermediate or high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason ≥7). With increasing PI-RADS score, there is an increase chance of detection of cancer as well as its aggressiveness. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5396401/ /pubmed/28469301 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bansal, Somendra Gupta, Narmada P. Yadav, Rajiv Khera, Rakesh Ahlawat, Kulbir Gautam, Dheeraj Ahlawat, Rajesh Gautam, Gagan Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title_full | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title_fullStr | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title_short | Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study |
title_sort | multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: a prospective, single centre study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469301 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bansalsomendra multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT guptanarmadap multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT yadavrajiv multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT kherarakesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT ahlawatkulbir multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT gautamdheeraj multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT ahlawatrajesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy AT gautamgagan multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy |