Cargando…

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study

INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Somendra, Gupta, Narmada P., Yadav, Rajiv, Khera, Rakesh, Ahlawat, Kulbir, Gautam, Dheeraj, Ahlawat, Rajesh, Gautam, Gagan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469301
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414
_version_ 1783230061675020288
author Bansal, Somendra
Gupta, Narmada P.
Yadav, Rajiv
Khera, Rakesh
Ahlawat, Kulbir
Gautam, Dheeraj
Ahlawat, Rajesh
Gautam, Gagan
author_facet Bansal, Somendra
Gupta, Narmada P.
Yadav, Rajiv
Khera, Rakesh
Ahlawat, Kulbir
Gautam, Dheeraj
Ahlawat, Rajesh
Gautam, Gagan
author_sort Bansal, Somendra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially improve cancer detection by better visualization and targeting of cancer focus. We evaluated the role of fusion biopsy in detection of prostate cancer and the association of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score for predicting cancer risk and its aggression. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive men with suspected prostate cancer underwent MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and standard 12 core biopsy from May 2014 to July 2015 in our institution. All patients underwent 3.0 T multiparametric MRI before biopsy. mp-MRI included T2W, DWI, DCE and MRS sequences to identify lesions suspicious for prostate cancer. Suspected lesions were scored according to PI-RADS scoring system. Comparison of cancer detection between standard 12 core biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was done. Detection of prostate cancer was primary end point of this study. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. Prostate cancer was detected in 57 patients (59.3%). Of these 57 patients, 8 patients (14%) were detected by standard 12 core biopsy only, 7 patients (12.3%) with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy only, and 42 patients (73.7%) by both techniques. Of the 7 patients, detected with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy alone, 6 patients (85.7%) had Gleason ≥7 disease. Prostate cancer was detected on either standard 12 core biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in 0%, 42.8%, 74%, and 89.3% patients of suspicious lesions of highest PI-RADS score 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy improves cancer detection rate when combined with standard 12 cores biopsy and detects more intermediate or high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason ≥7). With increasing PI-RADS score, there is an increase chance of detection of cancer as well as its aggressiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5396401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53964012017-05-03 Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study Bansal, Somendra Gupta, Narmada P. Yadav, Rajiv Khera, Rakesh Ahlawat, Kulbir Gautam, Dheeraj Ahlawat, Rajesh Gautam, Gagan Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transrectal rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, systematic biopsy has high false-negative rate and often misses anteriorly located tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy can potentially improve cancer detection by better visualization and targeting of cancer focus. We evaluated the role of fusion biopsy in detection of prostate cancer and the association of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score for predicting cancer risk and its aggression. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive men with suspected prostate cancer underwent MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions and standard 12 core biopsy from May 2014 to July 2015 in our institution. All patients underwent 3.0 T multiparametric MRI before biopsy. mp-MRI included T2W, DWI, DCE and MRS sequences to identify lesions suspicious for prostate cancer. Suspected lesions were scored according to PI-RADS scoring system. Comparison of cancer detection between standard 12 core biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was done. Detection of prostate cancer was primary end point of this study. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.4 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. Prostate cancer was detected in 57 patients (59.3%). Of these 57 patients, 8 patients (14%) were detected by standard 12 core biopsy only, 7 patients (12.3%) with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy only, and 42 patients (73.7%) by both techniques. Of the 7 patients, detected with MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy alone, 6 patients (85.7%) had Gleason ≥7 disease. Prostate cancer was detected on either standard 12 core biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in 0%, 42.8%, 74%, and 89.3% patients of suspicious lesions of highest PI-RADS score 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy improves cancer detection rate when combined with standard 12 cores biopsy and detects more intermediate or high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason ≥7). With increasing PI-RADS score, there is an increase chance of detection of cancer as well as its aggressiveness. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5396401/ /pubmed/28469301 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bansal, Somendra
Gupta, Narmada P.
Yadav, Rajiv
Khera, Rakesh
Ahlawat, Kulbir
Gautam, Dheeraj
Ahlawat, Rajesh
Gautam, Gagan
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title_full Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title_fullStr Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title_short Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study
title_sort multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: a prospective, single centre study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469301
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.203414
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalsomendra multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT guptanarmadap multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT yadavrajiv multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT kherarakesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT ahlawatkulbir multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT gautamdheeraj multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT ahlawatrajesh multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy
AT gautamgagan multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingtransrectalultrasoundfusionprostatebiopsyaprospectivesinglecentrestudy