Cargando…
A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
The structure, process and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at one hospital have been reviewed to determine where failings in the system could be improved, whether the existing training programme was adequate and well directed, and whether survival rates were reasonable. In the first s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Physicians of London
1993
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8426339 |
_version_ | 1783230095175974912 |
---|---|
author | McIntyre, A. S. Slater, M. |
author_facet | McIntyre, A. S. Slater, M. |
author_sort | McIntyre, A. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The structure, process and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at one hospital have been reviewed to determine where failings in the system could be improved, whether the existing training programme was adequate and well directed, and whether survival rates were reasonable. In the first seven months 143 reports were received; 49% of them were cardiac, 17% respiratory, and 24% mixed cardiorespiratory arrests. Overall, immediate survival was 43% of those with cardiorespiratory arrests. Seventy per cent of the immediate survivors were alive at 24 hours, and 69% of them survived to six weeks or beyond. The most important indicator for a successful outcome was the heart rhythm at the time of the resuscitation team's arrival, with 71% surviving from ventricular fibrillation, 20% surviving from apparent asystole, and only 9% surviving from electromechanical dissociation. No patient with the latter two rhythms survived to six weeks or left hospital. Neither the location or time of the arrest, nor the patient's age influenced the immediate survival. The audit revealed a need to improve telephone connections to the hospital switchboard, modify some equipment, and improve knowledge of the geography of the hospital site. Changes in emphasis in the training programme will alter the process of resuscitation. Outcome measures indicate that survival figures are comparable with published data, including recent data which act as a benchmark for quality control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5396593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1993 |
publisher | Royal College of Physicians of London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53965932019-01-22 A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation McIntyre, A. S. Slater, M. J R Coll Physicians Lond Medical Audit The structure, process and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at one hospital have been reviewed to determine where failings in the system could be improved, whether the existing training programme was adequate and well directed, and whether survival rates were reasonable. In the first seven months 143 reports were received; 49% of them were cardiac, 17% respiratory, and 24% mixed cardiorespiratory arrests. Overall, immediate survival was 43% of those with cardiorespiratory arrests. Seventy per cent of the immediate survivors were alive at 24 hours, and 69% of them survived to six weeks or beyond. The most important indicator for a successful outcome was the heart rhythm at the time of the resuscitation team's arrival, with 71% surviving from ventricular fibrillation, 20% surviving from apparent asystole, and only 9% surviving from electromechanical dissociation. No patient with the latter two rhythms survived to six weeks or left hospital. Neither the location or time of the arrest, nor the patient's age influenced the immediate survival. The audit revealed a need to improve telephone connections to the hospital switchboard, modify some equipment, and improve knowledge of the geography of the hospital site. Changes in emphasis in the training programme will alter the process of resuscitation. Outcome measures indicate that survival figures are comparable with published data, including recent data which act as a benchmark for quality control. Royal College of Physicians of London 1993-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5396593/ /pubmed/8426339 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1992 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Audit McIntyre, A. S. Slater, M. A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title | A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title_full | A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title_fullStr | A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title_short | A Clinical Audit of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation |
title_sort | clinical audit of cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
topic | Medical Audit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8426339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcintyreas aclinicalauditofcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT slaterm aclinicalauditofcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT mcintyreas clinicalauditofcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT slaterm clinicalauditofcardiopulmonaryresuscitation |