Cargando…

Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between elderly (aged $65 years) and non-elderly (aged <65 years) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on 483 (non-elderly: 245, elderly: 238) patients with upper u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yi-Zhong, Lin, Wun-Rong, Lee, Chih-Chiao, Sun, Fang-Ju, Chow, Yung-Chiong, Tsai, Wei-Kung, Chiang, Pai-Kai, Lin, Ting-Po, Chen, Marcelo, Chiu, Allen W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28442896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S134750
_version_ 1783230149825658880
author Chen, Yi-Zhong
Lin, Wun-Rong
Lee, Chih-Chiao
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chow, Yung-Chiong
Tsai, Wei-Kung
Chiang, Pai-Kai
Lin, Ting-Po
Chen, Marcelo
Chiu, Allen W
author_facet Chen, Yi-Zhong
Lin, Wun-Rong
Lee, Chih-Chiao
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chow, Yung-Chiong
Tsai, Wei-Kung
Chiang, Pai-Kai
Lin, Ting-Po
Chen, Marcelo
Chiu, Allen W
author_sort Chen, Yi-Zhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between elderly (aged $65 years) and non-elderly (aged <65 years) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on 483 (non-elderly: 245, elderly: 238) patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent shock wave lithotripsy between 2007 and 2015. The demographic data, stone parameters, stone-free rate, retreatment rate, and complication rate were analyzed in both elderly and non-elderly patient groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between non-elderly and elderly patients in terms of stone-free rate (46.5% vs 41.1%, P>0.05) regardless of stone site or stone size and overall retreatment rate (41.6% vs 37.0%, P>0.05). Elderly patients had a higher complication rate than non-elderly patients (15.5% vs 23.5%, P=0.026). The most common complication was flank pain. Receiver operating characteristic curves predicted that elderly patients (cutoff value: 65 years of age) had a higher risk of complications and that patients with smaller stones (cutoff value: 0.8 cm) had a higher stone-free rate. CONCLUSION: This study showed that elderly patients with upper urinary tract stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy had comparable efficacy for stone-free rates and retreatment rates, but higher complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5396840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53968402017-04-25 Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients Chen, Yi-Zhong Lin, Wun-Rong Lee, Chih-Chiao Sun, Fang-Ju Chow, Yung-Chiong Tsai, Wei-Kung Chiang, Pai-Kai Lin, Ting-Po Chen, Marcelo Chiu, Allen W Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between elderly (aged $65 years) and non-elderly (aged <65 years) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on 483 (non-elderly: 245, elderly: 238) patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent shock wave lithotripsy between 2007 and 2015. The demographic data, stone parameters, stone-free rate, retreatment rate, and complication rate were analyzed in both elderly and non-elderly patient groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between non-elderly and elderly patients in terms of stone-free rate (46.5% vs 41.1%, P>0.05) regardless of stone site or stone size and overall retreatment rate (41.6% vs 37.0%, P>0.05). Elderly patients had a higher complication rate than non-elderly patients (15.5% vs 23.5%, P=0.026). The most common complication was flank pain. Receiver operating characteristic curves predicted that elderly patients (cutoff value: 65 years of age) had a higher risk of complications and that patients with smaller stones (cutoff value: 0.8 cm) had a higher stone-free rate. CONCLUSION: This study showed that elderly patients with upper urinary tract stones undergoing shock wave lithotripsy had comparable efficacy for stone-free rates and retreatment rates, but higher complication rates. Dove Medical Press 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5396840/ /pubmed/28442896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S134750 Text en © 2017 Chen et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Yi-Zhong
Lin, Wun-Rong
Lee, Chih-Chiao
Sun, Fang-Ju
Chow, Yung-Chiong
Tsai, Wei-Kung
Chiang, Pai-Kai
Lin, Ting-Po
Chen, Marcelo
Chiu, Allen W
Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title_full Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title_fullStr Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title_short Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
title_sort comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28442896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S134750
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyizhong comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT linwunrong comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT leechihchiao comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT sunfangju comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT chowyungchiong comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT tsaiweikung comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT chiangpaikai comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT lintingpo comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT chenmarcelo comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients
AT chiuallenw comparisonofsafetyandoutcomesofshockwavelithotripsybetweenelderlyandnonelderlypatients