Cargando…
Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development
The potential hazards and risks associated with well-stimulation in unconventional oil and gas development (hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and matrix acidizing) have been investigated and evaluated and federal and state regulations requiring chemical disclosure for well-stimulation have been...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175344 |
_version_ | 1783230162438979584 |
---|---|
author | Stringfellow, William T. Camarillo, Mary Kay Domen, Jeremy K. Shonkoff, Seth B. C. |
author_facet | Stringfellow, William T. Camarillo, Mary Kay Domen, Jeremy K. Shonkoff, Seth B. C. |
author_sort | Stringfellow, William T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The potential hazards and risks associated with well-stimulation in unconventional oil and gas development (hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and matrix acidizing) have been investigated and evaluated and federal and state regulations requiring chemical disclosure for well-stimulation have been implemented as part of an overall risk management strategy for unconventional oil and gas development. Similar evaluations for chemicals used in other routine oil and gas development activities, such as maintenance acidizing, gravel packing, and well drilling, have not been previously conducted, in part due to a lack of reliable information concerning on-field chemical-use. In this study, we compare chemical-use between routine activities and the more closely regulated well-stimulation activities using data collected by the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), which mandates the reporting of both unconventional and routine on-field chemical-use for parts of Southern California. Analysis of this data shows that there is significant overlap in chemical-use between so-called unconventional activities and routine activities conducted for well maintenance, well-completion, or rework. A comparison within the SCAQMD shows a significant overlap between both types and amounts of chemicals used for well-stimulation treatments included under State mandatory-disclosure regulations and routine treatments that are not included under State regulations. A comparison between SCAQMD chemical-use for routine treatments and state-wide chemical-use for hydraulic fracturing also showed close similarity in chemical-use between activities covered under chemical disclosure requirements (e.g. hydraulic fracturing) and many other oil and gas field activities. The results of this study indicate regulations and risk assessments focused exclusively on chemicals used in well-stimulation activities may underestimate potential hazard or risk from overall oil field chemical-use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5396893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53968932017-05-04 Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development Stringfellow, William T. Camarillo, Mary Kay Domen, Jeremy K. Shonkoff, Seth B. C. PLoS One Research Article The potential hazards and risks associated with well-stimulation in unconventional oil and gas development (hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and matrix acidizing) have been investigated and evaluated and federal and state regulations requiring chemical disclosure for well-stimulation have been implemented as part of an overall risk management strategy for unconventional oil and gas development. Similar evaluations for chemicals used in other routine oil and gas development activities, such as maintenance acidizing, gravel packing, and well drilling, have not been previously conducted, in part due to a lack of reliable information concerning on-field chemical-use. In this study, we compare chemical-use between routine activities and the more closely regulated well-stimulation activities using data collected by the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), which mandates the reporting of both unconventional and routine on-field chemical-use for parts of Southern California. Analysis of this data shows that there is significant overlap in chemical-use between so-called unconventional activities and routine activities conducted for well maintenance, well-completion, or rework. A comparison within the SCAQMD shows a significant overlap between both types and amounts of chemicals used for well-stimulation treatments included under State mandatory-disclosure regulations and routine treatments that are not included under State regulations. A comparison between SCAQMD chemical-use for routine treatments and state-wide chemical-use for hydraulic fracturing also showed close similarity in chemical-use between activities covered under chemical disclosure requirements (e.g. hydraulic fracturing) and many other oil and gas field activities. The results of this study indicate regulations and risk assessments focused exclusively on chemicals used in well-stimulation activities may underestimate potential hazard or risk from overall oil field chemical-use. Public Library of Science 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5396893/ /pubmed/28422971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175344 Text en © 2017 Stringfellow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stringfellow, William T. Camarillo, Mary Kay Domen, Jeremy K. Shonkoff, Seth B. C. Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title | Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title_full | Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title_fullStr | Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title_short | Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
title_sort | comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stringfellowwilliamt comparisonofchemicalusebetweenhydraulicfracturingacidizingandroutineoilandgasdevelopment AT camarillomarykay comparisonofchemicalusebetweenhydraulicfracturingacidizingandroutineoilandgasdevelopment AT domenjeremyk comparisonofchemicalusebetweenhydraulicfracturingacidizingandroutineoilandgasdevelopment AT shonkoffsethbc comparisonofchemicalusebetweenhydraulicfracturingacidizingandroutineoilandgasdevelopment |