Cargando…

An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of partial and total coccyx excisions in patients with traumatic coccydynia resistant to conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 22 patients (from a total of 27) who underwent partial or total coccygectomy because of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogur, Hasan Ulas, Seyfettinoğlu, Firat, Tuhanioğlu, Ümit, Cicek, Hakan, Zohre, Sefa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28442929
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129198
_version_ 1783230170797178880
author Ogur, Hasan Ulas
Seyfettinoğlu, Firat
Tuhanioğlu, Ümit
Cicek, Hakan
Zohre, Sefa
author_facet Ogur, Hasan Ulas
Seyfettinoğlu, Firat
Tuhanioğlu, Ümit
Cicek, Hakan
Zohre, Sefa
author_sort Ogur, Hasan Ulas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of partial and total coccyx excisions in patients with traumatic coccydynia resistant to conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 22 patients (from a total of 27) who underwent partial or total coccygectomy because of persistent coccydynia between December 2007 and January 2014. There were 15 females and 7 males with a mean age of 33.6 years (range 23–46 years). Partial coccygectomy was performed in 14 patients and total coccygectomy in 8. They were evaluated according to their pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The mean follow-up period was 28 months (range 16–48 months). RESULTS: The mean VAS scores in the total excision group were 8.88±0.64 preoperatively and 2.5±2.67 at the final postoperative follow-up examination. In the partial excision group, these values were 8.79±0.89 preoperatively and 2.5±2.85 postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups with respect to the mean scores (p>0.05). No rectum injury was seen in any patient. When the VAS scores of the patients were evaluated as a whole, excellent and good results were obtained in 78%. Patient satisfaction with the operation was 90%. CONCLUSION: Coccyx excision is a successful treatment method in patients with long-term coccydynia who are resistant to conservative treatment. Two different surgical methods can be applied in the treatment and both of them have low complication rates and high patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5396938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53969382017-04-25 An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia Ogur, Hasan Ulas Seyfettinoğlu, Firat Tuhanioğlu, Ümit Cicek, Hakan Zohre, Sefa J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of partial and total coccyx excisions in patients with traumatic coccydynia resistant to conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 22 patients (from a total of 27) who underwent partial or total coccygectomy because of persistent coccydynia between December 2007 and January 2014. There were 15 females and 7 males with a mean age of 33.6 years (range 23–46 years). Partial coccygectomy was performed in 14 patients and total coccygectomy in 8. They were evaluated according to their pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The mean follow-up period was 28 months (range 16–48 months). RESULTS: The mean VAS scores in the total excision group were 8.88±0.64 preoperatively and 2.5±2.67 at the final postoperative follow-up examination. In the partial excision group, these values were 8.79±0.89 preoperatively and 2.5±2.85 postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups with respect to the mean scores (p>0.05). No rectum injury was seen in any patient. When the VAS scores of the patients were evaluated as a whole, excellent and good results were obtained in 78%. Patient satisfaction with the operation was 90%. CONCLUSION: Coccyx excision is a successful treatment method in patients with long-term coccydynia who are resistant to conservative treatment. Two different surgical methods can be applied in the treatment and both of them have low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Dove Medical Press 2017-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5396938/ /pubmed/28442929 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129198 Text en © 2017 Ogur et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ogur, Hasan Ulas
Seyfettinoğlu, Firat
Tuhanioğlu, Ümit
Cicek, Hakan
Zohre, Sefa
An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title_full An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title_fullStr An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title_short An evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
title_sort evaluation of two different methods of coccygectomy in patients with traumatic coccydynia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28442929
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129198
work_keys_str_mv AT ogurhasanulas anevaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT seyfettinoglufirat anevaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT tuhaniogluumit anevaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT cicekhakan anevaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT zohresefa anevaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT ogurhasanulas evaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT seyfettinoglufirat evaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT tuhaniogluumit evaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT cicekhakan evaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia
AT zohresefa evaluationoftwodifferentmethodsofcoccygectomyinpatientswithtraumaticcoccydynia