Cargando…
How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355 |
_version_ | 1783230221139312640 |
---|---|
author | Dans, Pablo D. Ivani, Ivan Hospital, Adam Portella, Guillem González, Carlos Orozco, Modesto |
author_facet | Dans, Pablo D. Ivani, Ivan Hospital, Adam Portella, Guillem González, Carlos Orozco, Modesto |
author_sort | Dans, Pablo D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have shown the ability to reproduce already existing ‘experimental models’, which in turn, have an unclear accuracy to represent DNA conformation in solution. In this work we explore the ability of different force-fields to predict the structure of two new B-DNA dodecamers, determined herein by means of (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The study allowed us to check directly for experimental NMR observables on duplexes previously not solved, and also to assess the reliability of ‘experimental structures’. We observed that technical details in the annealing procedures can induce non-negligible local changes in the final structures. We also found that while not all theoretical simulations are equally reliable, those obtained using last generation of AMBER force-fields (BSC1 and BSC0(OL15)) show predictive power in the multi-microsecond timescale and can be safely used to reproduce global structure of DNA duplexes and fine sequence-dependent details. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53971852017-04-24 How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? Dans, Pablo D. Ivani, Ivan Hospital, Adam Portella, Guillem González, Carlos Orozco, Modesto Nucleic Acids Res Structural Biology Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have shown the ability to reproduce already existing ‘experimental models’, which in turn, have an unclear accuracy to represent DNA conformation in solution. In this work we explore the ability of different force-fields to predict the structure of two new B-DNA dodecamers, determined herein by means of (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The study allowed us to check directly for experimental NMR observables on duplexes previously not solved, and also to assess the reliability of ‘experimental structures’. We observed that technical details in the annealing procedures can induce non-negligible local changes in the final structures. We also found that while not all theoretical simulations are equally reliable, those obtained using last generation of AMBER force-fields (BSC1 and BSC0(OL15)) show predictive power in the multi-microsecond timescale and can be safely used to reproduce global structure of DNA duplexes and fine sequence-dependent details. Oxford University Press 2017-04-20 2017-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5397185/ /pubmed/28088759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Structural Biology Dans, Pablo D. Ivani, Ivan Hospital, Adam Portella, Guillem González, Carlos Orozco, Modesto How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title | How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title_full | How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title_fullStr | How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title_full_unstemmed | How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title_short | How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? |
title_sort | how accurate are accurate force-fields for b-dna? |
topic | Structural Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danspablod howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna AT ivaniivan howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna AT hospitaladam howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna AT portellaguillem howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna AT gonzalezcarlos howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna AT orozcomodesto howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna |