Cargando…

How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?

Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dans, Pablo D., Ivani, Ivan, Hospital, Adam, Portella, Guillem, González, Carlos, Orozco, Modesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355
_version_ 1783230221139312640
author Dans, Pablo D.
Ivani, Ivan
Hospital, Adam
Portella, Guillem
González, Carlos
Orozco, Modesto
author_facet Dans, Pablo D.
Ivani, Ivan
Hospital, Adam
Portella, Guillem
González, Carlos
Orozco, Modesto
author_sort Dans, Pablo D.
collection PubMed
description Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have shown the ability to reproduce already existing ‘experimental models’, which in turn, have an unclear accuracy to represent DNA conformation in solution. In this work we explore the ability of different force-fields to predict the structure of two new B-DNA dodecamers, determined herein by means of (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The study allowed us to check directly for experimental NMR observables on duplexes previously not solved, and also to assess the reliability of ‘experimental structures’. We observed that technical details in the annealing procedures can induce non-negligible local changes in the final structures. We also found that while not all theoretical simulations are equally reliable, those obtained using last generation of AMBER force-fields (BSC1 and BSC0(OL15)) show predictive power in the multi-microsecond timescale and can be safely used to reproduce global structure of DNA duplexes and fine sequence-dependent details.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53971852017-04-24 How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA? Dans, Pablo D. Ivani, Ivan Hospital, Adam Portella, Guillem González, Carlos Orozco, Modesto Nucleic Acids Res Structural Biology Last generation of force-fields are raising expectations on the quality of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA, as well as to the belief that theoretical models can substitute experimental ones in several cases. However these claims are based on limited benchmarks, where MD simulations have shown the ability to reproduce already existing ‘experimental models’, which in turn, have an unclear accuracy to represent DNA conformation in solution. In this work we explore the ability of different force-fields to predict the structure of two new B-DNA dodecamers, determined herein by means of (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The study allowed us to check directly for experimental NMR observables on duplexes previously not solved, and also to assess the reliability of ‘experimental structures’. We observed that technical details in the annealing procedures can induce non-negligible local changes in the final structures. We also found that while not all theoretical simulations are equally reliable, those obtained using last generation of AMBER force-fields (BSC1 and BSC0(OL15)) show predictive power in the multi-microsecond timescale and can be safely used to reproduce global structure of DNA duplexes and fine sequence-dependent details. Oxford University Press 2017-04-20 2017-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5397185/ /pubmed/28088759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Structural Biology
Dans, Pablo D.
Ivani, Ivan
Hospital, Adam
Portella, Guillem
González, Carlos
Orozco, Modesto
How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title_full How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title_fullStr How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title_full_unstemmed How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title_short How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?
title_sort how accurate are accurate force-fields for b-dna?
topic Structural Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1355
work_keys_str_mv AT danspablod howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna
AT ivaniivan howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna
AT hospitaladam howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna
AT portellaguillem howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna
AT gonzalezcarlos howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna
AT orozcomodesto howaccurateareaccurateforcefieldsforbdna