Cargando…
Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention
In the last decade, a number of studies have reported sex differences in selective attention, but a unified explanation for these effects is still missing. This study aims to better understand these differences and put them in an evolutionary psychological context. 418 adult participants performed a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4 |
_version_ | 1783230247119880192 |
---|---|
author | Stoet, Gijsbert |
author_facet | Stoet, Gijsbert |
author_sort | Stoet, Gijsbert |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the last decade, a number of studies have reported sex differences in selective attention, but a unified explanation for these effects is still missing. This study aims to better understand these differences and put them in an evolutionary psychological context. 418 adult participants performed a computer-based Simon task, in which they responded to the direction of a left or right pointing arrow appearing left or right from a fixation point. Women were more strongly influenced by task-irrelevant spatial information than men (i.e., the Simon effect was larger in women, Cohen’s d = 0.39). Further, the analysis of sex differences in behavioral adjustment to errors revealed that women slow down more than men following mistakes (d = 0.53). Based on the combined results of previous studies and the current data, it is proposed that sex differences in selective attention are caused by underlying sex differences in core abilities, such as spatial or verbal cognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53974282017-05-04 Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention Stoet, Gijsbert Psychol Res Original Article In the last decade, a number of studies have reported sex differences in selective attention, but a unified explanation for these effects is still missing. This study aims to better understand these differences and put them in an evolutionary psychological context. 418 adult participants performed a computer-based Simon task, in which they responded to the direction of a left or right pointing arrow appearing left or right from a fixation point. Women were more strongly influenced by task-irrelevant spatial information than men (i.e., the Simon effect was larger in women, Cohen’s d = 0.39). Further, the analysis of sex differences in behavioral adjustment to errors revealed that women slow down more than men following mistakes (d = 0.53). Based on the combined results of previous studies and the current data, it is proposed that sex differences in selective attention are caused by underlying sex differences in core abilities, such as spatial or verbal cognition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-08 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397428/ /pubmed/26957425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stoet, Gijsbert Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title | Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title_full | Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title_short | Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
title_sort | sex differences in the simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoetgijsbert sexdifferencesinthesimontaskhelptointerpretsexdifferencesinselectiveattention |