Cargando…

Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kutlar Joss, Meltem, Eeftens, Marloes, Gintowt, Emily, Kappeler, Ron, Künzli, Nino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y
_version_ 1783230254075084800
author Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Eeftens, Marloes
Gintowt, Emily
Kappeler, Ron
Künzli, Nino
author_facet Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Eeftens, Marloes
Gintowt, Emily
Kappeler, Ron
Künzli, Nino
author_sort Kutlar Joss, Meltem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled an inventory of ambient air quality standards for 194 countries worldwide for six air pollutants: PM(2.5), PM(10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide. We conducted literature and internet searches and asked country representatives about national ambient air quality standards. RESULTS: We found information on 170 countries including 57 countries that did not set any air quality standards. Levels varied greatly by country and by pollutant. Ambient air quality standards for PM(2.5), PM(10) and SO(2) poorly complied with WHO guideline values. The agreement was higher for CO, SO(2) (10-min averaging time) and NO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory differences mirror the differences in air quality and the related burden of disease around the globe. Governments worldwide should adopt science based air quality standards and clean air management plans to continuously improve air quality locally, nationally, and globally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53974452017-05-04 Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards Kutlar Joss, Meltem Eeftens, Marloes Gintowt, Emily Kappeler, Ron Künzli, Nino Int J Public Health Original Article OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled an inventory of ambient air quality standards for 194 countries worldwide for six air pollutants: PM(2.5), PM(10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide. We conducted literature and internet searches and asked country representatives about national ambient air quality standards. RESULTS: We found information on 170 countries including 57 countries that did not set any air quality standards. Levels varied greatly by country and by pollutant. Ambient air quality standards for PM(2.5), PM(10) and SO(2) poorly complied with WHO guideline values. The agreement was higher for CO, SO(2) (10-min averaging time) and NO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory differences mirror the differences in air quality and the related burden of disease around the globe. Governments worldwide should adopt science based air quality standards and clean air management plans to continuously improve air quality locally, nationally, and globally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-02-27 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397445/ /pubmed/28243681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kutlar Joss, Meltem
Eeftens, Marloes
Gintowt, Emily
Kappeler, Ron
Künzli, Nino
Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title_full Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title_fullStr Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title_full_unstemmed Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title_short Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
title_sort time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kutlarjossmeltem timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards
AT eeftensmarloes timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards
AT gintowtemily timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards
AT kappelerron timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards
AT kunzlinino timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards