Cargando…
Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards
OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y |
_version_ | 1783230254075084800 |
---|---|
author | Kutlar Joss, Meltem Eeftens, Marloes Gintowt, Emily Kappeler, Ron Künzli, Nino |
author_facet | Kutlar Joss, Meltem Eeftens, Marloes Gintowt, Emily Kappeler, Ron Künzli, Nino |
author_sort | Kutlar Joss, Meltem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled an inventory of ambient air quality standards for 194 countries worldwide for six air pollutants: PM(2.5), PM(10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide. We conducted literature and internet searches and asked country representatives about national ambient air quality standards. RESULTS: We found information on 170 countries including 57 countries that did not set any air quality standards. Levels varied greatly by country and by pollutant. Ambient air quality standards for PM(2.5), PM(10) and SO(2) poorly complied with WHO guideline values. The agreement was higher for CO, SO(2) (10-min averaging time) and NO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory differences mirror the differences in air quality and the related burden of disease around the globe. Governments worldwide should adopt science based air quality standards and clean air management plans to continuously improve air quality locally, nationally, and globally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53974452017-05-04 Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards Kutlar Joss, Meltem Eeftens, Marloes Gintowt, Emily Kappeler, Ron Künzli, Nino Int J Public Health Original Article OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization has developed ambient air quality guidelines at levels considered to be safe or of acceptable risk for human health. These guidelines are meant to support governments in defining national standards. It is unclear how they are followed. METHODS: We compiled an inventory of ambient air quality standards for 194 countries worldwide for six air pollutants: PM(2.5), PM(10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide. We conducted literature and internet searches and asked country representatives about national ambient air quality standards. RESULTS: We found information on 170 countries including 57 countries that did not set any air quality standards. Levels varied greatly by country and by pollutant. Ambient air quality standards for PM(2.5), PM(10) and SO(2) poorly complied with WHO guideline values. The agreement was higher for CO, SO(2) (10-min averaging time) and NO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory differences mirror the differences in air quality and the related burden of disease around the globe. Governments worldwide should adopt science based air quality standards and clean air management plans to continuously improve air quality locally, nationally, and globally. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-02-27 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397445/ /pubmed/28243681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kutlar Joss, Meltem Eeftens, Marloes Gintowt, Emily Kappeler, Ron Künzli, Nino Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title | Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title_full | Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title_fullStr | Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title_short | Time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
title_sort | time to harmonize national ambient air quality standards |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0952-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kutlarjossmeltem timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards AT eeftensmarloes timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards AT gintowtemily timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards AT kappelerron timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards AT kunzlinino timetoharmonizenationalambientairqualitystandards |