Cargando…

The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship

Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall, James, Hellman, Eva, Denend, Lyn, Rait, Douglas, Venook, Ross, Lucian, Linda, Azagury, Dan, Yock, Paul G., Brinton, Todd J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1
_version_ 1783230254884585472
author Wall, James
Hellman, Eva
Denend, Lyn
Rait, Douglas
Venook, Ross
Lucian, Linda
Azagury, Dan
Yock, Paul G.
Brinton, Todd J.
author_facet Wall, James
Hellman, Eva
Denend, Lyn
Rait, Douglas
Venook, Ross
Lucian, Linda
Azagury, Dan
Yock, Paul G.
Brinton, Todd J.
author_sort Wall, James
collection PubMed
description Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational programs have been initiated, yet the impact of this type of training remains poorly understood. This study measures the career focus, leadership trajectory, and productivity of 114 Biodesign Innovation Fellowship alumni based on survey data and public career information. It also compares alumni on certain publicly available metrics to finalists interviewed but not selected. Overall, 60% of alumni are employed in health technology in contrast to 35% of finalists interviewed but not selected. On leadership, 72% of alumni hold managerial or higher positions compared to 48% of the finalist group. A total of 67% of alumni reported that the fellowship had been “extremely beneficial” on their careers. As a measure of technology translation, more than 440,000 patients have been reached with technologies developed directly out of the Biodesign Innovation Fellowship, with another 1,000,000+ aided by solutions initiated by alumni after their training. This study suggests a positive impact of the fellowship program on the career focus, leadership, and productivity of its alumni.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53974482017-05-04 The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship Wall, James Hellman, Eva Denend, Lyn Rait, Douglas Venook, Ross Lucian, Linda Azagury, Dan Yock, Paul G. Brinton, Todd J. Ann Biomed Eng Article Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational programs have been initiated, yet the impact of this type of training remains poorly understood. This study measures the career focus, leadership trajectory, and productivity of 114 Biodesign Innovation Fellowship alumni based on survey data and public career information. It also compares alumni on certain publicly available metrics to finalists interviewed but not selected. Overall, 60% of alumni are employed in health technology in contrast to 35% of finalists interviewed but not selected. On leadership, 72% of alumni hold managerial or higher positions compared to 48% of the finalist group. A total of 67% of alumni reported that the fellowship had been “extremely beneficial” on their careers. As a measure of technology translation, more than 440,000 patients have been reached with technologies developed directly out of the Biodesign Innovation Fellowship, with another 1,000,000+ aided by solutions initiated by alumni after their training. This study suggests a positive impact of the fellowship program on the career focus, leadership, and productivity of its alumni. Springer US 2016-12-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397448/ /pubmed/28004213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Wall, James
Hellman, Eva
Denend, Lyn
Rait, Douglas
Venook, Ross
Lucian, Linda
Azagury, Dan
Yock, Paul G.
Brinton, Todd J.
The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title_full The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title_fullStr The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title_short The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
title_sort impact of postgraduate health technology innovation training: outcomes of the stanford biodesign fellowship
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1
work_keys_str_mv AT walljames theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT hellmaneva theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT denendlyn theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT raitdouglas theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT venookross theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT lucianlinda theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT azagurydan theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT yockpaulg theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT brintontoddj theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT walljames impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT hellmaneva impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT denendlyn impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT raitdouglas impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT venookross impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT lucianlinda impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT azagurydan impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT yockpaulg impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship
AT brintontoddj impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship