Cargando…
The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship
Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1 |
_version_ | 1783230254884585472 |
---|---|
author | Wall, James Hellman, Eva Denend, Lyn Rait, Douglas Venook, Ross Lucian, Linda Azagury, Dan Yock, Paul G. Brinton, Todd J. |
author_facet | Wall, James Hellman, Eva Denend, Lyn Rait, Douglas Venook, Ross Lucian, Linda Azagury, Dan Yock, Paul G. Brinton, Todd J. |
author_sort | Wall, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational programs have been initiated, yet the impact of this type of training remains poorly understood. This study measures the career focus, leadership trajectory, and productivity of 114 Biodesign Innovation Fellowship alumni based on survey data and public career information. It also compares alumni on certain publicly available metrics to finalists interviewed but not selected. Overall, 60% of alumni are employed in health technology in contrast to 35% of finalists interviewed but not selected. On leadership, 72% of alumni hold managerial or higher positions compared to 48% of the finalist group. A total of 67% of alumni reported that the fellowship had been “extremely beneficial” on their careers. As a measure of technology translation, more than 440,000 patients have been reached with technologies developed directly out of the Biodesign Innovation Fellowship, with another 1,000,000+ aided by solutions initiated by alumni after their training. This study suggests a positive impact of the fellowship program on the career focus, leadership, and productivity of its alumni. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53974482017-05-04 The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship Wall, James Hellman, Eva Denend, Lyn Rait, Douglas Venook, Ross Lucian, Linda Azagury, Dan Yock, Paul G. Brinton, Todd J. Ann Biomed Eng Article Stanford Biodesign launched its Innovation Fellowship in 2001 as a first-of-its kind postgraduate training experience for teaching biomedical technology innovators a need-driven process for developing medical technologies and delivering them to patients. Since then, many design-oriented educational programs have been initiated, yet the impact of this type of training remains poorly understood. This study measures the career focus, leadership trajectory, and productivity of 114 Biodesign Innovation Fellowship alumni based on survey data and public career information. It also compares alumni on certain publicly available metrics to finalists interviewed but not selected. Overall, 60% of alumni are employed in health technology in contrast to 35% of finalists interviewed but not selected. On leadership, 72% of alumni hold managerial or higher positions compared to 48% of the finalist group. A total of 67% of alumni reported that the fellowship had been “extremely beneficial” on their careers. As a measure of technology translation, more than 440,000 patients have been reached with technologies developed directly out of the Biodesign Innovation Fellowship, with another 1,000,000+ aided by solutions initiated by alumni after their training. This study suggests a positive impact of the fellowship program on the career focus, leadership, and productivity of its alumni. Springer US 2016-12-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397448/ /pubmed/28004213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Wall, James Hellman, Eva Denend, Lyn Rait, Douglas Venook, Ross Lucian, Linda Azagury, Dan Yock, Paul G. Brinton, Todd J. The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title | The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title_full | The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title_short | The Impact of Postgraduate Health Technology Innovation Training: Outcomes of the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship |
title_sort | impact of postgraduate health technology innovation training: outcomes of the stanford biodesign fellowship |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1777-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walljames theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT hellmaneva theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT denendlyn theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT raitdouglas theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT venookross theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT lucianlinda theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT azagurydan theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT yockpaulg theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT brintontoddj theimpactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT walljames impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT hellmaneva impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT denendlyn impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT raitdouglas impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT venookross impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT lucianlinda impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT azagurydan impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT yockpaulg impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship AT brintontoddj impactofpostgraduatehealthtechnologyinnovationtrainingoutcomesofthestanfordbiodesignfellowship |