Cargando…

Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma

Cooperative behavior is often assumed to depend on individuals' characteristics, such as altruism and reasoning ability. Evidence is mixed about what the precise impact of these characteristics is, as the subjects of study are generally randomly paired, generating a heterogeneous mix of the two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván, Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Ainhoa, Pavan, Marina, Sabater-Grande, Gerardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00596
_version_ 1783230275653730304
author Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván
Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Ainhoa
Pavan, Marina
Sabater-Grande, Gerardo
author_facet Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván
Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Ainhoa
Pavan, Marina
Sabater-Grande, Gerardo
author_sort Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván
collection PubMed
description Cooperative behavior is often assumed to depend on individuals' characteristics, such as altruism and reasoning ability. Evidence is mixed about what the precise impact of these characteristics is, as the subjects of study are generally randomly paired, generating a heterogeneous mix of the two characteristics. In this study we ex-ante create four different groups of subjects by factoring their higher or lower than the median scores in both altruism and reasoning ability. Then we use these groups in order to analyze the joint effect of the two characteristics on the individual choice of cooperating and on successful paired cooperation. Subjects belonging to each group play first 10 one-shot prisoner's dilemma (PD) games with ten random partners and then three consecutive 10-round repeated PD games with three random partners. In all games, we elicit players' beliefs regarding cooperation using an incentive compatible method. Individuals with high altruism are more optimistic about the cooperative behavior of the other player in the one-shot game. They also show higher individual cooperation and paired cooperation rates in the first repetitions of this game. Contrary to the one-shot PD games where high reasoning ability reduces the probability of playing cooperatively, the sign of the relationship is inverted in the first repeated PD game, showing that high reasoning ability individuals better adjust their behavior to the characteristics of the game they are playing. In this sense, the joint effect of reasoning ability and altruism is not linear, with reasoning ability counteracting the cooperative effect of altruism in the one-shot game and reinforcing it in the first repeated game. However, experience playing the repeated PD games takes over the two individual characteristics in explaining individual and paired cooperation. Thus, in a (PD) setting, altruism and reasoning ability significantly affect behavior in single encounters, while in repeated interactions individual and paired cooperation reach similarly high levels independently of these individual characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53975282017-05-04 Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Ainhoa Pavan, Marina Sabater-Grande, Gerardo Front Psychol Psychology Cooperative behavior is often assumed to depend on individuals' characteristics, such as altruism and reasoning ability. Evidence is mixed about what the precise impact of these characteristics is, as the subjects of study are generally randomly paired, generating a heterogeneous mix of the two characteristics. In this study we ex-ante create four different groups of subjects by factoring their higher or lower than the median scores in both altruism and reasoning ability. Then we use these groups in order to analyze the joint effect of the two characteristics on the individual choice of cooperating and on successful paired cooperation. Subjects belonging to each group play first 10 one-shot prisoner's dilemma (PD) games with ten random partners and then three consecutive 10-round repeated PD games with three random partners. In all games, we elicit players' beliefs regarding cooperation using an incentive compatible method. Individuals with high altruism are more optimistic about the cooperative behavior of the other player in the one-shot game. They also show higher individual cooperation and paired cooperation rates in the first repetitions of this game. Contrary to the one-shot PD games where high reasoning ability reduces the probability of playing cooperatively, the sign of the relationship is inverted in the first repeated PD game, showing that high reasoning ability individuals better adjust their behavior to the characteristics of the game they are playing. In this sense, the joint effect of reasoning ability and altruism is not linear, with reasoning ability counteracting the cooperative effect of altruism in the one-shot game and reinforcing it in the first repeated game. However, experience playing the repeated PD games takes over the two individual characteristics in explaining individual and paired cooperation. Thus, in a (PD) setting, altruism and reasoning ability significantly affect behavior in single encounters, while in repeated interactions individual and paired cooperation reach similarly high levels independently of these individual characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397528/ /pubmed/28473787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00596 Text en Copyright © 2017 Barreda-Tarrazona, Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Pavan and Sabater-Grande. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván
Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, Ainhoa
Pavan, Marina
Sabater-Grande, Gerardo
Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title_full Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title_fullStr Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title_full_unstemmed Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title_short Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma
title_sort individual characteristics vs. experience: an experimental study on cooperation in prisoner's dilemma
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00596
work_keys_str_mv AT barredatarrazonaivan individualcharacteristicsvsexperienceanexperimentalstudyoncooperationinprisonersdilemma
AT jaramillogutierrezainhoa individualcharacteristicsvsexperienceanexperimentalstudyoncooperationinprisonersdilemma
AT pavanmarina individualcharacteristicsvsexperienceanexperimentalstudyoncooperationinprisonersdilemma
AT sabatergrandegerardo individualcharacteristicsvsexperienceanexperimentalstudyoncooperationinprisonersdilemma