Cargando…
Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y |
_version_ | 1783230323305218048 |
---|---|
author | O’Flaherty, Katherine Maguire, Julia Simpson, Julie A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. |
author_facet | O’Flaherty, Katherine Maguire, Julia Simpson, Julie A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. |
author_sort | O’Flaherty, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host immunity and anti-malarial treatment failure. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify studies investigating malaria antibody levels in patients receiving anti-malarial treatment for symptomatic malaria with treatment failure recorded according to the World Health Organization classification. Odds ratios or hazard ratios were extracted or calculated to quantify the association between malarial antibody levels and treatment failure, and findings from different studies were visualized using forest plots. RESULTS: Eight studies, including patients with falciparum malaria treated with mono- and combination therapy of artemisinin derivatives, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and chloroquine, were identified. Reported and calculated effect estimates varied greatly between studies, even those assessing the same antigens and treatments. An association between blood-stage IgG responses and treatment efficacy was observed. The greatest magnitudes of effect were observed for artemisinin [OR/HR (95% CI) range 0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.08 (0.57, 2.06)] and chloroquine [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–0.32 (0.05, 1.96)] treatments, and larger magnitudes of effect were observed for variant surface antigen responses [0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.92 (0.94, 3.91)] when compared with merozoite specific responses [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–2.83 (1.13, 7.09)]. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired malarial immunity is associated with reduced anti-malarial treatment failure in malaria endemic populations. Anti-malarial IgG effects treatment outcome differently for different anti-malarial drugs and antigen targets, and had the greatest impact during treatment with the current first-line treatments, the artemisinins. This has implications for the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarials, particularly in the context of emerging artemisinin resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53977372017-04-20 Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review O’Flaherty, Katherine Maguire, Julia Simpson, Julie A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host immunity and anti-malarial treatment failure. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify studies investigating malaria antibody levels in patients receiving anti-malarial treatment for symptomatic malaria with treatment failure recorded according to the World Health Organization classification. Odds ratios or hazard ratios were extracted or calculated to quantify the association between malarial antibody levels and treatment failure, and findings from different studies were visualized using forest plots. RESULTS: Eight studies, including patients with falciparum malaria treated with mono- and combination therapy of artemisinin derivatives, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and chloroquine, were identified. Reported and calculated effect estimates varied greatly between studies, even those assessing the same antigens and treatments. An association between blood-stage IgG responses and treatment efficacy was observed. The greatest magnitudes of effect were observed for artemisinin [OR/HR (95% CI) range 0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.08 (0.57, 2.06)] and chloroquine [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–0.32 (0.05, 1.96)] treatments, and larger magnitudes of effect were observed for variant surface antigen responses [0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.92 (0.94, 3.91)] when compared with merozoite specific responses [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–2.83 (1.13, 7.09)]. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired malarial immunity is associated with reduced anti-malarial treatment failure in malaria endemic populations. Anti-malarial IgG effects treatment outcome differently for different anti-malarial drugs and antigen targets, and had the greatest impact during treatment with the current first-line treatments, the artemisinins. This has implications for the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarials, particularly in the context of emerging artemisinin resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397737/ /pubmed/28427418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research O’Flaherty, Katherine Maguire, Julia Simpson, Julie A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title | Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title_full | Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title_short | Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
title_sort | immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oflahertykatherine immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview AT maguirejulia immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview AT simpsonjuliea immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview AT fowkesfreyaji immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview |