Cargando…

Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Flaherty, Katherine, Maguire, Julia, Simpson, Julie A., Fowkes, Freya J. I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y
_version_ 1783230323305218048
author O’Flaherty, Katherine
Maguire, Julia
Simpson, Julie A.
Fowkes, Freya J. I.
author_facet O’Flaherty, Katherine
Maguire, Julia
Simpson, Julie A.
Fowkes, Freya J. I.
author_sort O’Flaherty, Katherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host immunity and anti-malarial treatment failure. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify studies investigating malaria antibody levels in patients receiving anti-malarial treatment for symptomatic malaria with treatment failure recorded according to the World Health Organization classification. Odds ratios or hazard ratios were extracted or calculated to quantify the association between malarial antibody levels and treatment failure, and findings from different studies were visualized using forest plots. RESULTS: Eight studies, including patients with falciparum malaria treated with mono- and combination therapy of artemisinin derivatives, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and chloroquine, were identified. Reported and calculated effect estimates varied greatly between studies, even those assessing the same antigens and treatments. An association between blood-stage IgG responses and treatment efficacy was observed. The greatest magnitudes of effect were observed for artemisinin [OR/HR (95% CI) range 0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.08 (0.57, 2.06)] and chloroquine [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–0.32 (0.05, 1.96)] treatments, and larger magnitudes of effect were observed for variant surface antigen responses [0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.92 (0.94, 3.91)] when compared with merozoite specific responses [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–2.83 (1.13, 7.09)]. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired malarial immunity is associated with reduced anti-malarial treatment failure in malaria endemic populations. Anti-malarial IgG effects treatment outcome differently for different anti-malarial drugs and antigen targets, and had the greatest impact during treatment with the current first-line treatments, the artemisinins. This has implications for the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarials, particularly in the context of emerging artemisinin resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53977372017-04-20 Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review O’Flaherty, Katherine Maguire, Julia Simpson, Julie A. Fowkes, Freya J. I. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Naturally acquired immunity can reduce parasitaemia and potentially influence anti-malarial treatment outcomes; however, evidence for this in the current literature provides conflicted results. The available evidence was synthesized to determine and quantify the association between host immunity and anti-malarial treatment failure. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify studies investigating malaria antibody levels in patients receiving anti-malarial treatment for symptomatic malaria with treatment failure recorded according to the World Health Organization classification. Odds ratios or hazard ratios were extracted or calculated to quantify the association between malarial antibody levels and treatment failure, and findings from different studies were visualized using forest plots. RESULTS: Eight studies, including patients with falciparum malaria treated with mono- and combination therapy of artemisinin derivatives, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine and chloroquine, were identified. Reported and calculated effect estimates varied greatly between studies, even those assessing the same antigens and treatments. An association between blood-stage IgG responses and treatment efficacy was observed. The greatest magnitudes of effect were observed for artemisinin [OR/HR (95% CI) range 0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.08 (0.57, 2.06)] and chloroquine [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–0.32 (0.05, 1.96)] treatments, and larger magnitudes of effect were observed for variant surface antigen responses [0.02 (0.00, 0.45)–1.92 (0.94, 3.91)] when compared with merozoite specific responses [0.24 (0.04, 1.37)–2.83 (1.13, 7.09)]. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired malarial immunity is associated with reduced anti-malarial treatment failure in malaria endemic populations. Anti-malarial IgG effects treatment outcome differently for different anti-malarial drugs and antigen targets, and had the greatest impact during treatment with the current first-line treatments, the artemisinins. This has implications for the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of anti-malarials, particularly in the context of emerging artemisinin resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397737/ /pubmed/28427418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
O’Flaherty, Katherine
Maguire, Julia
Simpson, Julie A.
Fowkes, Freya J. I.
Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title_full Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title_fullStr Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title_short Immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
title_sort immunity as a predictor of anti-malarial treatment failure: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1815-y
work_keys_str_mv AT oflahertykatherine immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview
AT maguirejulia immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview
AT simpsonjuliea immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview
AT fowkesfreyaji immunityasapredictorofantimalarialtreatmentfailureasystematicreview