Cargando…

Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data

BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease (GD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency in acid beta-glucosidase. GD exhibits a wide clinical spectrum of disease severity with an unpredictable natural course. Plasma chitotriosidase activity and CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raskovalova, Tatiana, Deegan, Patrick B., Yang, Ruby, Pavlova, Elena, Stirnemann, Jérome, Labarère, José, Zimran, Ari, Mistry, Pramod K., Berger, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0483-x
_version_ 1783230324085358592
author Raskovalova, Tatiana
Deegan, Patrick B.
Yang, Ruby
Pavlova, Elena
Stirnemann, Jérome
Labarère, José
Zimran, Ari
Mistry, Pramod K.
Berger, Marc
author_facet Raskovalova, Tatiana
Deegan, Patrick B.
Yang, Ruby
Pavlova, Elena
Stirnemann, Jérome
Labarère, José
Zimran, Ari
Mistry, Pramod K.
Berger, Marc
author_sort Raskovalova, Tatiana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease (GD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency in acid beta-glucosidase. GD exhibits a wide clinical spectrum of disease severity with an unpredictable natural course. Plasma chitotriosidase activity and CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) have been exchangeably used for monitoring GD activity and response to enzyme replacement therapy in conjunction with clinical assessment. Yet, a large-scale head-to-head comparison of these two biomarkers is currently lacking. We propose a collaborative systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) to compare the accuracy of plasma chitotriosidase activity and CCL18 in assessing type I (i.e., non-neuropathic) GD severity. METHODS: Eligible studies include cross-sectional, cohort, and randomized controlled studies recording both plasma chitotriosidase activity and CCL18 level at baseline and/or at follow-up in consecutive children or adult patients with type I GD. Pre-specified surrogate outcomes reflecting GD activity include liver and spleen volume, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and symptomatic bone events with imaging confirmation. Primary studies will be identified by searching Medline (1995 onwards), EMBASE (1995 onwards), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Electronic search will be complemented by contacting research groups in order to identify unpublished relevant studies. Where possible, IPD will be extracted from published articles. Corresponding authors will be invited to collaborate by supplying IPD. The methodological quality of retrieved studies will be appraised for each study outcome, using a checklist adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The primary outcome will be a composite of liver volume >1.25 multiple of normal (MN), spleen volume >5 MN, hemoglobin concentration <11 g/dL, or platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L. Effect size estimates for biomarker comparative accuracy in predicting outcomes will be reported as differences in areas under receiver operating characteristic curves along with 95% confidence intervals. Effect size estimates will be reported as (weighted) mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals for each biomarker according to outcomes. IPD meta-analysis will be conducted with both one- and two-stage approaches. DISCUSSION: Valid and precise accuracy estimates will be derived for CCL18 relative to plasma chitotriosidase activity in discriminating patients according to GD severity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2015 CRD42015027243 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0483-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53977402017-04-20 Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data Raskovalova, Tatiana Deegan, Patrick B. Yang, Ruby Pavlova, Elena Stirnemann, Jérome Labarère, José Zimran, Ari Mistry, Pramod K. Berger, Marc Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease (GD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency in acid beta-glucosidase. GD exhibits a wide clinical spectrum of disease severity with an unpredictable natural course. Plasma chitotriosidase activity and CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) have been exchangeably used for monitoring GD activity and response to enzyme replacement therapy in conjunction with clinical assessment. Yet, a large-scale head-to-head comparison of these two biomarkers is currently lacking. We propose a collaborative systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) to compare the accuracy of plasma chitotriosidase activity and CCL18 in assessing type I (i.e., non-neuropathic) GD severity. METHODS: Eligible studies include cross-sectional, cohort, and randomized controlled studies recording both plasma chitotriosidase activity and CCL18 level at baseline and/or at follow-up in consecutive children or adult patients with type I GD. Pre-specified surrogate outcomes reflecting GD activity include liver and spleen volume, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, and symptomatic bone events with imaging confirmation. Primary studies will be identified by searching Medline (1995 onwards), EMBASE (1995 onwards), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Electronic search will be complemented by contacting research groups in order to identify unpublished relevant studies. Where possible, IPD will be extracted from published articles. Corresponding authors will be invited to collaborate by supplying IPD. The methodological quality of retrieved studies will be appraised for each study outcome, using a checklist adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The primary outcome will be a composite of liver volume >1.25 multiple of normal (MN), spleen volume >5 MN, hemoglobin concentration <11 g/dL, or platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L. Effect size estimates for biomarker comparative accuracy in predicting outcomes will be reported as differences in areas under receiver operating characteristic curves along with 95% confidence intervals. Effect size estimates will be reported as (weighted) mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals for each biomarker according to outcomes. IPD meta-analysis will be conducted with both one- and two-stage approaches. DISCUSSION: Valid and precise accuracy estimates will be derived for CCL18 relative to plasma chitotriosidase activity in discriminating patients according to GD severity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2015 CRD42015027243 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0483-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397740/ /pubmed/28427477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0483-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Raskovalova, Tatiana
Deegan, Patrick B.
Yang, Ruby
Pavlova, Elena
Stirnemann, Jérome
Labarère, José
Zimran, Ari
Mistry, Pramod K.
Berger, Marc
Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_full Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_fullStr Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_full_unstemmed Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_short Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_sort plasma chitotriosidase activity versus ccl18 level for assessing type i gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0483-x
work_keys_str_mv AT raskovalovatatiana plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT deeganpatrickb plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT yangruby plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT pavlovaelena plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT stirnemannjerome plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT labarerejose plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT zimranari plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT mistrypramodk plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT bergermarc plasmachitotriosidaseactivityversusccl18levelforassessingtypeigaucherdiseaseseverityprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata