Cargando…
Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand st...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4 |
_version_ | 1783230341390008320 |
---|---|
author | Humphreys, David K. Panter, Jenna Ogilvie, David |
author_facet | Humphreys, David K. Panter, Jenna Ogilvie, David |
author_sort | Humphreys, David K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand study quality, we found the results of this study both interesting and potentially useful. However, it prompted a number of concerns with the use of risk of bias tools for assessing the quality of evidence from studies exploiting natural experiments. As we discuss in this commentary, the rigid application of such tools could have adverse effects on the uptake and use of natural experiments in population health research and practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53978082017-04-21 Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 Humphreys, David K. Panter, Jenna Ogilvie, David Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Commentary We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand study quality, we found the results of this study both interesting and potentially useful. However, it prompted a number of concerns with the use of risk of bias tools for assessing the quality of evidence from studies exploiting natural experiments. As we discuss in this commentary, the rigid application of such tools could have adverse effects on the uptake and use of natural experiments in population health research and practice. BioMed Central 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5397808/ /pubmed/28424086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Humphreys, David K. Panter, Jenna Ogilvie, David Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title | Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title_full | Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title_fullStr | Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title_short | Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 |
title_sort | questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on benton et al., ijbnpa 2016 |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT humphreysdavidk questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016 AT panterjenna questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016 AT ogilviedavid questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016 |