Cargando…

Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016

We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Humphreys, David K., Panter, Jenna, Ogilvie, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4
_version_ 1783230341390008320
author Humphreys, David K.
Panter, Jenna
Ogilvie, David
author_facet Humphreys, David K.
Panter, Jenna
Ogilvie, David
author_sort Humphreys, David K.
collection PubMed
description We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand study quality, we found the results of this study both interesting and potentially useful. However, it prompted a number of concerns with the use of risk of bias tools for assessing the quality of evidence from studies exploiting natural experiments. As we discuss in this commentary, the rigid application of such tools could have adverse effects on the uptake and use of natural experiments in population health research and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53978082017-04-21 Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016 Humphreys, David K. Panter, Jenna Ogilvie, David Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Commentary We recently read the article by Benton et al. which reviewed risk of bias in natural experimental studies investigating the impact of the built environment on physical activity (Benton et al., 2016; Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:107). As a technical exercise in assessing risk of bias to understand study quality, we found the results of this study both interesting and potentially useful. However, it prompted a number of concerns with the use of risk of bias tools for assessing the quality of evidence from studies exploiting natural experiments. As we discuss in this commentary, the rigid application of such tools could have adverse effects on the uptake and use of natural experiments in population health research and practice. BioMed Central 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5397808/ /pubmed/28424086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Humphreys, David K.
Panter, Jenna
Ogilvie, David
Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title_full Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title_fullStr Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title_full_unstemmed Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title_short Questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on Benton et al., IJBNPA 2016
title_sort questioning the application of risk of bias tools in appraising evidence from natural experimental studies: critical reflections on benton et al., ijbnpa 2016
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0500-4
work_keys_str_mv AT humphreysdavidk questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016
AT panterjenna questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016
AT ogilviedavid questioningtheapplicationofriskofbiastoolsinappraisingevidencefromnaturalexperimentalstudiescriticalreflectionsonbentonetalijbnpa2016