Cargando…

Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals

BACKGROUND: Information and communication sources in the healthcare sector are replaced with new eHealth technologies. This has led to problems arising from the lack of awareness of the importance of end-user involvement in eHealth development and of the difficulties caused by using traditional summ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling, Bertelsen, Pernille, Nøhr, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2
_version_ 1783230346878255104
author Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling
Bertelsen, Pernille
Nøhr, Christian
author_facet Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling
Bertelsen, Pernille
Nøhr, Christian
author_sort Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information and communication sources in the healthcare sector are replaced with new eHealth technologies. This has led to problems arising from the lack of awareness of the importance of end-user involvement in eHealth development and of the difficulties caused by using traditional summative evaluation methods. The Constructive eHealth evaluation method (CeHEM) provides a solution to these problems by offering an evaluation framework for supporting and facilitating end-user involvement during all phases of eHealth development. The aim of this paper is to support this process by sharing experiences of the eHealth evaluation method used in the introduction of electronic health records (EHR) in the North Denmark Region of Denmark. It is the first time the fully developed method and the experiences on using the CeHEM in all five phases of a full lifecycle framework is presented. METHODS: A case study evaluation of the EHR development process in the North Denmark Region was conducted from 2004 to 2010. The population consisted of clinicians, IT professionals, administrators, and vendors. The study involved 4 hospitals in the region. Data were collected using questionnaires, observations, interviews, and insight gathered from relevant documents. RESULTS: The evaluation showed a need for a) Early involvement of clinicians, b) The best possible representation of clinicians, and c) Workload reduction for those involved. The consequences of not providing this were a lack of ownership of decisions and negative attitudes towards the clinical benefits related to these decisions. Further, the result disclosed that by following the above recommendations, and by providing feedback to the 4 actor groups, the physicians’ involvement was improved. As a result they took ownership of decisions and gained a positive attitude to the clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The CeHEM has proven successful in formative evaluation of EHR development and can point at important issues that need to be taken care of by management. The method provides a framework that takes care of feedback and learning during eHealth development. It can thus support successful eHealth development in a broader context while building on a well-known success factor: end-user involvement in eHealth development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53978292017-04-21 Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling Bertelsen, Pernille Nøhr, Christian BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Information and communication sources in the healthcare sector are replaced with new eHealth technologies. This has led to problems arising from the lack of awareness of the importance of end-user involvement in eHealth development and of the difficulties caused by using traditional summative evaluation methods. The Constructive eHealth evaluation method (CeHEM) provides a solution to these problems by offering an evaluation framework for supporting and facilitating end-user involvement during all phases of eHealth development. The aim of this paper is to support this process by sharing experiences of the eHealth evaluation method used in the introduction of electronic health records (EHR) in the North Denmark Region of Denmark. It is the first time the fully developed method and the experiences on using the CeHEM in all five phases of a full lifecycle framework is presented. METHODS: A case study evaluation of the EHR development process in the North Denmark Region was conducted from 2004 to 2010. The population consisted of clinicians, IT professionals, administrators, and vendors. The study involved 4 hospitals in the region. Data were collected using questionnaires, observations, interviews, and insight gathered from relevant documents. RESULTS: The evaluation showed a need for a) Early involvement of clinicians, b) The best possible representation of clinicians, and c) Workload reduction for those involved. The consequences of not providing this were a lack of ownership of decisions and negative attitudes towards the clinical benefits related to these decisions. Further, the result disclosed that by following the above recommendations, and by providing feedback to the 4 actor groups, the physicians’ involvement was improved. As a result they took ownership of decisions and gained a positive attitude to the clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The CeHEM has proven successful in formative evaluation of EHR development and can point at important issues that need to be taken care of by management. The method provides a framework that takes care of feedback and learning during eHealth development. It can thus support successful eHealth development in a broader context while building on a well-known success factor: end-user involvement in eHealth development. BioMed Central 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397829/ /pubmed/28427407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Høstgaard, Anna Marie Balling
Bertelsen, Pernille
Nøhr, Christian
Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title_full Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title_fullStr Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title_short Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals
title_sort constructive ehealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of ehr development in 4 danish hospitals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2
work_keys_str_mv AT høstgaardannamarieballing constructiveehealthevaluationlessonsfromevaluationofehrdevelopmentin4danishhospitals
AT bertelsenpernille constructiveehealthevaluationlessonsfromevaluationofehrdevelopmentin4danishhospitals
AT nøhrchristian constructiveehealthevaluationlessonsfromevaluationofehrdevelopmentin4danishhospitals