Cargando…

The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials

Evidence is growing that vulnerability to depression may be characterized by strong negative feedback loops between mental states. It is unknown whether such dynamics between mental states can be altered by treatment. This study examined whether treatment with imipramine or treatment with Mindfulnes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snippe, Evelien, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, Geschwind, Nicole, Klippel, Annelie, de Jonge, Peter, Wichers, Marieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46523
_version_ 1783230351612575744
author Snippe, Evelien
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Geschwind, Nicole
Klippel, Annelie
de Jonge, Peter
Wichers, Marieke
author_facet Snippe, Evelien
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Geschwind, Nicole
Klippel, Annelie
de Jonge, Peter
Wichers, Marieke
author_sort Snippe, Evelien
collection PubMed
description Evidence is growing that vulnerability to depression may be characterized by strong negative feedback loops between mental states. It is unknown whether such dynamics between mental states can be altered by treatment. This study examined whether treatment with imipramine or treatment with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) reduces the connectivity within dynamic networks of mental states in individuals with depressive symptoms. In the Imipramine trial, individuals diagnosed with major depression were randomized to imipramine treatment or placebo-pill treatment (n = 50). In the Mind-Maastricht trial, individuals with residual depressive symptoms were randomized to Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) or to a waiting-list control condition (n = 119). Lagged associations among mental states, as assessed with the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), were estimated at baseline and post-intervention. The results show that few of the dynamic network connections changed significantly over time and few of the changes after MBCT and imipramine treatment differed significantly from the control groups. The decrease in average node connectivity after MBCT did not differ from the decrease observed in the waiting-list control group. Our findings suggest that imipramine treatment and MBCT do not greatly change the dynamic network structure of mental states, even though they do reduce depressive symptomatology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53978472017-04-21 The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials Snippe, Evelien Viechtbauer, Wolfgang Geschwind, Nicole Klippel, Annelie de Jonge, Peter Wichers, Marieke Sci Rep Article Evidence is growing that vulnerability to depression may be characterized by strong negative feedback loops between mental states. It is unknown whether such dynamics between mental states can be altered by treatment. This study examined whether treatment with imipramine or treatment with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) reduces the connectivity within dynamic networks of mental states in individuals with depressive symptoms. In the Imipramine trial, individuals diagnosed with major depression were randomized to imipramine treatment or placebo-pill treatment (n = 50). In the Mind-Maastricht trial, individuals with residual depressive symptoms were randomized to Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) or to a waiting-list control condition (n = 119). Lagged associations among mental states, as assessed with the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), were estimated at baseline and post-intervention. The results show that few of the dynamic network connections changed significantly over time and few of the changes after MBCT and imipramine treatment differed significantly from the control groups. The decrease in average node connectivity after MBCT did not differ from the decrease observed in the waiting-list control group. Our findings suggest that imipramine treatment and MBCT do not greatly change the dynamic network structure of mental states, even though they do reduce depressive symptomatology. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5397847/ /pubmed/28425449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46523 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Snippe, Evelien
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Geschwind, Nicole
Klippel, Annelie
de Jonge, Peter
Wichers, Marieke
The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Impact of Treatments for Depression on the Dynamic Network Structure of Mental States: Two Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort impact of treatments for depression on the dynamic network structure of mental states: two randomized controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46523
work_keys_str_mv AT snippeevelien theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT viechtbauerwolfgang theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT geschwindnicole theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT klippelannelie theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dejongepeter theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wichersmarieke theimpactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT snippeevelien impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT viechtbauerwolfgang impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT geschwindnicole impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT klippelannelie impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dejongepeter impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wichersmarieke impactoftreatmentsfordepressiononthedynamicnetworkstructureofmentalstatestworandomizedcontrolledtrials