Cargando…
Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased du...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164933 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238 |
_version_ | 1783230379181735936 |
---|---|
author | Valentin, Olivier John, Sasha M. Laville, Frédéric |
author_facet | Valentin, Olivier John, Sasha M. Laville, Frédéric |
author_sort | Valentin, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased due to the low frequency masking effects from test subjects’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is explored as a technique which might overcome these limitations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pure tone stimuli (500 and 1000 Hz), amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, are presented to 10 normal-hearing adults through headphones at three levels in 10 dB steps. Two conditions were assessed: unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level are linearized using least-square regressions. The “physiological attenuation” is then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. The technical feasibility of measuring earplug attenuation is demonstrated for the group average attenuation across subjects. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference is found between the average REAT attenuation and the average ASSR-based attenuation. CONCLUSION: Feasibility is not yet demonstrated for individual subjects since differences between the estimates occurred for some subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5397996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53979962017-05-03 Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation Valentin, Olivier John, Sasha M. Laville, Frédéric Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased due to the low frequency masking effects from test subjects’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is explored as a technique which might overcome these limitations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pure tone stimuli (500 and 1000 Hz), amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, are presented to 10 normal-hearing adults through headphones at three levels in 10 dB steps. Two conditions were assessed: unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level are linearized using least-square regressions. The “physiological attenuation” is then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. The technical feasibility of measuring earplug attenuation is demonstrated for the group average attenuation across subjects. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference is found between the average REAT attenuation and the average ASSR-based attenuation. CONCLUSION: Feasibility is not yet demonstrated for individual subjects since differences between the estimates occurred for some subjects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397996/ /pubmed/28164933 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Valentin, Olivier John, Sasha M. Laville, Frédéric Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title_full | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title_fullStr | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title_short | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation |
title_sort | using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector attenuation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164933 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valentinolivier usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation AT johnsasham usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation AT lavillefrederic usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation |