Cargando…

Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation

INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valentin, Olivier, John, Sasha M., Laville, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164933
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238
_version_ 1783230379181735936
author Valentin, Olivier
John, Sasha M.
Laville, Frédéric
author_facet Valentin, Olivier
John, Sasha M.
Laville, Frédéric
author_sort Valentin, Olivier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased due to the low frequency masking effects from test subjects’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is explored as a technique which might overcome these limitations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pure tone stimuli (500 and 1000 Hz), amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, are presented to 10 normal-hearing adults through headphones at three levels in 10 dB steps. Two conditions were assessed: unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level are linearized using least-square regressions. The “physiological attenuation” is then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. The technical feasibility of measuring earplug attenuation is demonstrated for the group average attenuation across subjects. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference is found between the average REAT attenuation and the average ASSR-based attenuation. CONCLUSION: Feasibility is not yet demonstrated for individual subjects since differences between the estimates occurred for some subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5397996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53979962017-05-03 Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation Valentin, Olivier John, Sasha M. Laville, Frédéric Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: Present methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective measurements such as field microphone in real-ear do not assess bone-conducted sound. Psychophysical measurements such as real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) are biased due to the low frequency masking effects from test subjects’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is explored as a technique which might overcome these limitations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pure tone stimuli (500 and 1000 Hz), amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, are presented to 10 normal-hearing adults through headphones at three levels in 10 dB steps. Two conditions were assessed: unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level are linearized using least-square regressions. The “physiological attenuation” is then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. The technical feasibility of measuring earplug attenuation is demonstrated for the group average attenuation across subjects. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference is found between the average REAT attenuation and the average ASSR-based attenuation. CONCLUSION: Feasibility is not yet demonstrated for individual subjects since differences between the estimates occurred for some subjects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5397996/ /pubmed/28164933 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Valentin, Olivier
John, Sasha M.
Laville, Frédéric
Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title_full Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title_fullStr Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title_full_unstemmed Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title_short Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation
title_sort using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector attenuation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5397996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28164933
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.199238
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinolivier usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation
AT johnsasham usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation
AT lavillefrederic usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorattenuation