Cargando…

Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers

Background: The main aim of these studies was to explore the influence of volume information on glassware on the time taken to consume an alcoholic beverage. Methods: In Study 1, male and female social alcohol consumers (n = 159) were randomised to drink 12 fl oz of either low or standard strength l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Troy, David M., Attwood, Angela S., Maynard, Olivia M., Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E., Hickman, Matthew, Marteau, Theresa M., Munafò, Marcus R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5398342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw142
_version_ 1783230447780626432
author Troy, David M.
Attwood, Angela S.
Maynard, Olivia M.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Hickman, Matthew
Marteau, Theresa M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
author_facet Troy, David M.
Attwood, Angela S.
Maynard, Olivia M.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Hickman, Matthew
Marteau, Theresa M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
author_sort Troy, David M.
collection PubMed
description Background: The main aim of these studies was to explore the influence of volume information on glassware on the time taken to consume an alcoholic beverage. Methods: In Study 1, male and female social alcohol consumers (n = 159) were randomised to drink 12 fl oz of either low or standard strength lager, from either a curved glass marked with yellow tape at the midpoint or an unmarked curved glass, in a between-subjects design. In Study 2, male and female social alcohol consumers (n = 160) were randomised to drink 12 fl oz of standard strength lager from either a curved glass marked with ¼, ½ and ¾ volume points or an unmarked curved glass, in a between-subjects design. The primary outcome measure for both studies was total drinking time of an alcoholic beverage. Results: In Study 1, after removing outliers, total drinking time was slower from the glass with midpoint volume marking [mean drinking times (min): 9.98 (marked) vs. 9.55 (unmarked), mean difference = 0.42, 95% CI: −0.90, 1.44]. In Study 2, after removing outliers, total drinking time was slower from the glass with multiple volume marks [mean drinking times: 10.34 (marked) vs. 9.11 (unmarked), mean difference = 1.24, 95% CI: −0.11, 2.59]. However, in both studies confidence intervals were wide and also consistent with faster consumption from marked glasses. Conclusion: Consumption of an alcoholic beverage may be slower when served in glasses with volume information. Replication in larger studies is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5398342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53983422017-04-20 Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers Troy, David M. Attwood, Angela S. Maynard, Olivia M. Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Hickman, Matthew Marteau, Theresa M. Munafò, Marcus R. Eur J Public Health Alcohol Background: The main aim of these studies was to explore the influence of volume information on glassware on the time taken to consume an alcoholic beverage. Methods: In Study 1, male and female social alcohol consumers (n = 159) were randomised to drink 12 fl oz of either low or standard strength lager, from either a curved glass marked with yellow tape at the midpoint or an unmarked curved glass, in a between-subjects design. In Study 2, male and female social alcohol consumers (n = 160) were randomised to drink 12 fl oz of standard strength lager from either a curved glass marked with ¼, ½ and ¾ volume points or an unmarked curved glass, in a between-subjects design. The primary outcome measure for both studies was total drinking time of an alcoholic beverage. Results: In Study 1, after removing outliers, total drinking time was slower from the glass with midpoint volume marking [mean drinking times (min): 9.98 (marked) vs. 9.55 (unmarked), mean difference = 0.42, 95% CI: −0.90, 1.44]. In Study 2, after removing outliers, total drinking time was slower from the glass with multiple volume marks [mean drinking times: 10.34 (marked) vs. 9.11 (unmarked), mean difference = 1.24, 95% CI: −0.11, 2.59]. However, in both studies confidence intervals were wide and also consistent with faster consumption from marked glasses. Conclusion: Consumption of an alcoholic beverage may be slower when served in glasses with volume information. Replication in larger studies is warranted. Oxford University Press 2017-04 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5398342/ /pubmed/28339526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw142 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Alcohol
Troy, David M.
Attwood, Angela S.
Maynard, Olivia M.
Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E.
Hickman, Matthew
Marteau, Theresa M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title_full Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title_fullStr Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title_short Effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
title_sort effect of glass markings on drinking rate in social alcohol drinkers
topic Alcohol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5398342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw142
work_keys_str_mv AT troydavidm effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT attwoodangelas effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT maynardoliviam effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT scottsamuelnicholase effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT hickmanmatthew effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT marteautheresam effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers
AT munafomarcusr effectofglassmarkingsondrinkingrateinsocialalcoholdrinkers