Cargando…
The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685 |
_version_ | 1783230631447101440 |
---|---|
author | Sivareddy, S. Paul, Arya Sluka, Travis Ravichandran, M. Kalnay, Eugenia |
author_facet | Sivareddy, S. Paul, Arya Sluka, Travis Ravichandran, M. Kalnay, Eugenia |
author_sort | Sivareddy, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is most prominent. These mismatches are usually mitigated either by the model dynamics in between the analysis cycles and/or by assimilation at the next analysis cycle. However, if the observations coverage is limited in space, as it was in the ocean before the Argo era, these mechanisms may be insufficient to dampen the mismatches, which we call shocks, and they may remain and grow. Here we show through controlled experiments, using real and simulated observations in two different ocean models and assimilation systems, that such shocks are generated in the ocean at the lateral boundaries of the moored buoy network. They thrive and propagate westward as Rossby waves along these boundaries. However, these shocks are essentially eliminated by the assimilation of near-homogenous global Argo distribution. These findings question the fidelity of ocean reanalysis products in the pre-Argo era. For example, a reanalysis that ignores Argo floats and assimilates only moored buoys, wrongly represents 2008 as a negative Indian Ocean Dipole year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5399374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53993742017-04-21 The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys Sivareddy, S. Paul, Arya Sluka, Travis Ravichandran, M. Kalnay, Eugenia Sci Rep Article Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is most prominent. These mismatches are usually mitigated either by the model dynamics in between the analysis cycles and/or by assimilation at the next analysis cycle. However, if the observations coverage is limited in space, as it was in the ocean before the Argo era, these mechanisms may be insufficient to dampen the mismatches, which we call shocks, and they may remain and grow. Here we show through controlled experiments, using real and simulated observations in two different ocean models and assimilation systems, that such shocks are generated in the ocean at the lateral boundaries of the moored buoy network. They thrive and propagate westward as Rossby waves along these boundaries. However, these shocks are essentially eliminated by the assimilation of near-homogenous global Argo distribution. These findings question the fidelity of ocean reanalysis products in the pre-Argo era. For example, a reanalysis that ignores Argo floats and assimilates only moored buoys, wrongly represents 2008 as a negative Indian Ocean Dipole year. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5399374/ /pubmed/28429748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Sivareddy, S. Paul, Arya Sluka, Travis Ravichandran, M. Kalnay, Eugenia The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title | The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title_full | The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title_fullStr | The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title_full_unstemmed | The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title_short | The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
title_sort | pre-argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivareddys thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT paularya thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT slukatravis thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT ravichandranm thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT kalnayeugenia thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT sivareddys preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT paularya preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT slukatravis preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT ravichandranm preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys AT kalnayeugenia preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys |