Cargando…

The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys

Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivareddy, S., Paul, Arya, Sluka, Travis, Ravichandran, M., Kalnay, Eugenia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685
_version_ 1783230631447101440
author Sivareddy, S.
Paul, Arya
Sluka, Travis
Ravichandran, M.
Kalnay, Eugenia
author_facet Sivareddy, S.
Paul, Arya
Sluka, Travis
Ravichandran, M.
Kalnay, Eugenia
author_sort Sivareddy, S.
collection PubMed
description Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is most prominent. These mismatches are usually mitigated either by the model dynamics in between the analysis cycles and/or by assimilation at the next analysis cycle. However, if the observations coverage is limited in space, as it was in the ocean before the Argo era, these mechanisms may be insufficient to dampen the mismatches, which we call shocks, and they may remain and grow. Here we show through controlled experiments, using real and simulated observations in two different ocean models and assimilation systems, that such shocks are generated in the ocean at the lateral boundaries of the moored buoy network. They thrive and propagate westward as Rossby waves along these boundaries. However, these shocks are essentially eliminated by the assimilation of near-homogenous global Argo distribution. These findings question the fidelity of ocean reanalysis products in the pre-Argo era. For example, a reanalysis that ignores Argo floats and assimilates only moored buoys, wrongly represents 2008 as a negative Indian Ocean Dipole year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5399374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53993742017-04-21 The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys Sivareddy, S. Paul, Arya Sluka, Travis Ravichandran, M. Kalnay, Eugenia Sci Rep Article Assimilation methods, meant to constrain divergence of model trajectory from reality using observations, do not exactly satisfy the physical laws governing the model state variables. This allows mismatches in the analysis in the vicinity of observation locations where the effect of assimilation is most prominent. These mismatches are usually mitigated either by the model dynamics in between the analysis cycles and/or by assimilation at the next analysis cycle. However, if the observations coverage is limited in space, as it was in the ocean before the Argo era, these mechanisms may be insufficient to dampen the mismatches, which we call shocks, and they may remain and grow. Here we show through controlled experiments, using real and simulated observations in two different ocean models and assimilation systems, that such shocks are generated in the ocean at the lateral boundaries of the moored buoy network. They thrive and propagate westward as Rossby waves along these boundaries. However, these shocks are essentially eliminated by the assimilation of near-homogenous global Argo distribution. These findings question the fidelity of ocean reanalysis products in the pre-Argo era. For example, a reanalysis that ignores Argo floats and assimilates only moored buoys, wrongly represents 2008 as a negative Indian Ocean Dipole year. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5399374/ /pubmed/28429748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Sivareddy, S.
Paul, Arya
Sluka, Travis
Ravichandran, M.
Kalnay, Eugenia
The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title_full The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title_fullStr The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title_full_unstemmed The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title_short The pre-Argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
title_sort pre-argo ocean reanalyses may be seriously affected by the spatial coverage of moored buoys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28429748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46685
work_keys_str_mv AT sivareddys thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT paularya thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT slukatravis thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT ravichandranm thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT kalnayeugenia thepreargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT sivareddys preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT paularya preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT slukatravis preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT ravichandranm preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys
AT kalnayeugenia preargooceanreanalysesmaybeseriouslyaffectedbythespatialcoverageofmooredbuoys