Cargando…

Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the potential effectiveness of a programme’s objectives (health or otherwise) is important in demonstrating how programmes work. However, evaluations are expensive and can focus on unrealistic outcomes not grounded in strong theory, especially where there is pressure to sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belford, Melissa, Robertson, Tony, Jepson, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0334-4
_version_ 1783230707174211584
author Belford, Melissa
Robertson, Tony
Jepson, Ruth
author_facet Belford, Melissa
Robertson, Tony
Jepson, Ruth
author_sort Belford, Melissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the potential effectiveness of a programme’s objectives (health or otherwise) is important in demonstrating how programmes work. However, evaluations are expensive and can focus on unrealistic outcomes not grounded in strong theory, especially where there is pressure to show effectiveness. The aim of this research was to demonstrate that the evaluability assessment (a cost-effective pre-evaluation tool that primarily gives quick, constructive feedback) can be used to help develop programme and outcome objectives to improve programmes while they run and to assist in producing more effective evaluations. This was done using the example of a community development programme aiming to improve health and reduce health inequalities in its target population. METHODS: The setting was Glasgow, Scotland, UK and focused on the Health Issues in the Community programme. Data were collected from documents and nine individual stakeholder interviews. Thematic analysis and a realist approach were used to analyse both datasets and, in conjunction with a workshop with stakeholders, produce a logic model of the programme theory and related evaluation options to explore further. RESULTS: Five main themes emerged from the analysis: History; Framework; Structure and Delivery of the Course; Theory of Action; and Barriers to Delivery and Successful Outcomes. These themes aided in drafting the logic model which revealed they key programme activities (e.g. facilitating group learning) and 23 potential outcomes. The majority of these outcomes (16) were deemed to be short-term outcomes (more easily measured within the timeframe of an individual being involved in the programme) e.g. increased self-esteem or awareness of individual/community health. The remaining 6 outcomes were deemed longer-term and included outcomes such as increased social capital and individual mental health and wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the evaluability assessment tool can be applied to the evaluation of community health programmes, providing short- and long-term outcomes that could be evaluated to demonstrate effectiveness and avoid unnecessary or poorly designed full-scale evaluations. This type of pre-evaluation method is already a useful resource for national policy evaluations, but could be a valuable evaluation tool for other regional or community health programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5399800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53998002017-04-24 Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study Belford, Melissa Robertson, Tony Jepson, Ruth BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the potential effectiveness of a programme’s objectives (health or otherwise) is important in demonstrating how programmes work. However, evaluations are expensive and can focus on unrealistic outcomes not grounded in strong theory, especially where there is pressure to show effectiveness. The aim of this research was to demonstrate that the evaluability assessment (a cost-effective pre-evaluation tool that primarily gives quick, constructive feedback) can be used to help develop programme and outcome objectives to improve programmes while they run and to assist in producing more effective evaluations. This was done using the example of a community development programme aiming to improve health and reduce health inequalities in its target population. METHODS: The setting was Glasgow, Scotland, UK and focused on the Health Issues in the Community programme. Data were collected from documents and nine individual stakeholder interviews. Thematic analysis and a realist approach were used to analyse both datasets and, in conjunction with a workshop with stakeholders, produce a logic model of the programme theory and related evaluation options to explore further. RESULTS: Five main themes emerged from the analysis: History; Framework; Structure and Delivery of the Course; Theory of Action; and Barriers to Delivery and Successful Outcomes. These themes aided in drafting the logic model which revealed they key programme activities (e.g. facilitating group learning) and 23 potential outcomes. The majority of these outcomes (16) were deemed to be short-term outcomes (more easily measured within the timeframe of an individual being involved in the programme) e.g. increased self-esteem or awareness of individual/community health. The remaining 6 outcomes were deemed longer-term and included outcomes such as increased social capital and individual mental health and wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the evaluability assessment tool can be applied to the evaluation of community health programmes, providing short- and long-term outcomes that could be evaluated to demonstrate effectiveness and avoid unnecessary or poorly designed full-scale evaluations. This type of pre-evaluation method is already a useful resource for national policy evaluations, but could be a valuable evaluation tool for other regional or community health programmes. BioMed Central 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5399800/ /pubmed/28431505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0334-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belford, Melissa
Robertson, Tony
Jepson, Ruth
Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title_full Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title_fullStr Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title_full_unstemmed Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title_short Using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a Scottish case-study
title_sort using evaluability assessment to assess local community development health programmes: a scottish case-study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0334-4
work_keys_str_mv AT belfordmelissa usingevaluabilityassessmenttoassesslocalcommunitydevelopmenthealthprogrammesascottishcasestudy
AT robertsontony usingevaluabilityassessmenttoassesslocalcommunitydevelopmenthealthprogrammesascottishcasestudy
AT jepsonruth usingevaluabilityassessmenttoassesslocalcommunitydevelopmenthealthprogrammesascottishcasestudy