Cargando…

Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents to prevent infections in non-surgical situations has hardly been investigated. We investigate the extent, indications and appropriateness of antimicrobial prophylaxis given outside the operating room in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deelen, Jan W. T., Visser, Caroline E., Prins, Jan M., van Hest, Reinier M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2354-4
_version_ 1783230712962351104
author Deelen, Jan W. T.
Visser, Caroline E.
Prins, Jan M.
van Hest, Reinier M.
author_facet Deelen, Jan W. T.
Visser, Caroline E.
Prins, Jan M.
van Hest, Reinier M.
author_sort Deelen, Jan W. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents to prevent infections in non-surgical situations has hardly been investigated. We investigate the extent, indications and appropriateness of antimicrobial prophylaxis given outside the operating room in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Four point-prevalence surveys were conducted in which all inpatients on that day were screened for the use of prophylactic antimicrobials: medical prophylaxis, prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward. The primary endpoint was the extent of prophylaxis relative to the total number of antimicrobial prescriptions. We also investigated per prescription the presence of a (local) protocol and adherence to these protocols. RESULTS: We registered in total 1020 antimicrobial prescriptions, of which 317 (31.1%) were given as prophylaxis. 827/1020 were antibiotic prescriptions. Of these antibiotic prescriptions, 17.0% was medical prophylaxis, 2.7% prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and 6.9% surgical prophylaxis administered on a ward. For medical antibiotic prophylaxis, a protocol was present in 125 of 141 prescriptions (88.7%); the protocol was followed in 118 cases (94.4%). For prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis on the wards, protocol presence and adherence rates were 59.1% and 92.3%, and 73.3% and 97.6% respectively. Of the 96 antiviral and 97 antifungal prescriptions, 42.7% and 57.8%, respectively, were medical prophylaxis, of which 95.1 and 96.3% were prescribed according to protocols respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre is responsible for a considerable part of total in-hospital antimicrobial use. For most prescriptions there was a protocol and adherence to the protocols was high. The main targets for improvement were prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5399822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53998222017-04-24 Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital Deelen, Jan W. T. Visser, Caroline E. Prins, Jan M. van Hest, Reinier M. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents to prevent infections in non-surgical situations has hardly been investigated. We investigate the extent, indications and appropriateness of antimicrobial prophylaxis given outside the operating room in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Four point-prevalence surveys were conducted in which all inpatients on that day were screened for the use of prophylactic antimicrobials: medical prophylaxis, prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward. The primary endpoint was the extent of prophylaxis relative to the total number of antimicrobial prescriptions. We also investigated per prescription the presence of a (local) protocol and adherence to these protocols. RESULTS: We registered in total 1020 antimicrobial prescriptions, of which 317 (31.1%) were given as prophylaxis. 827/1020 were antibiotic prescriptions. Of these antibiotic prescriptions, 17.0% was medical prophylaxis, 2.7% prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and 6.9% surgical prophylaxis administered on a ward. For medical antibiotic prophylaxis, a protocol was present in 125 of 141 prescriptions (88.7%); the protocol was followed in 118 cases (94.4%). For prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis on the wards, protocol presence and adherence rates were 59.1% and 92.3%, and 73.3% and 97.6% respectively. Of the 96 antiviral and 97 antifungal prescriptions, 42.7% and 57.8%, respectively, were medical prophylaxis, of which 95.1 and 96.3% were prescribed according to protocols respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre is responsible for a considerable part of total in-hospital antimicrobial use. For most prescriptions there was a protocol and adherence to the protocols was high. The main targets for improvement were prophylaxis around non-surgical interventions and surgical prophylaxis given on the ward. BioMed Central 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5399822/ /pubmed/28431507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2354-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deelen, Jan W. T.
Visser, Caroline E.
Prins, Jan M.
van Hest, Reinier M.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title_full Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title_fullStr Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title_short Antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
title_sort antimicrobial prophylaxis outside the operating theatre, an audit in a university hospital
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28431507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2354-4
work_keys_str_mv AT deelenjanwt antimicrobialprophylaxisoutsidetheoperatingtheatreanauditinauniversityhospital
AT vissercarolinee antimicrobialprophylaxisoutsidetheoperatingtheatreanauditinauniversityhospital
AT prinsjanm antimicrobialprophylaxisoutsidetheoperatingtheatreanauditinauniversityhospital
AT vanhestreinierm antimicrobialprophylaxisoutsidetheoperatingtheatreanauditinauniversityhospital