Cargando…

“Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use

The concept of a post-natal “mesenchymal stem cell” (“MSC”) originated from studies focused on bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), which are non-hematopoietic adherent cells, a subset of which are skeletal stem cells (SSCs), able to form cartilage, bone, hematopoiesis-supportive stroma, and marrow ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Robey, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491279
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10955.1
_version_ 1783230739991494656
author Robey, Pamela
author_facet Robey, Pamela
author_sort Robey, Pamela
collection PubMed
description The concept of a post-natal “mesenchymal stem cell” (“MSC”) originated from studies focused on bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), which are non-hematopoietic adherent cells, a subset of which are skeletal stem cells (SSCs), able to form cartilage, bone, hematopoiesis-supportive stroma, and marrow adipocytes based on rigorous clonal and differentiation assays. Subsequently, it was speculated that BMSCs could form other mesodermal derivatives and even cell types from other germ layers. Based on BMSC surface markers, representative of fibroblastic cells, and imprecise differentiation assays, it was further imagined that “MSCs” are ubiquitous and equipotent. However, “MSCs” do not have a common embryonic origin and are not a lineage, but recent studies indicate that they are tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells. These cells share cell surface features owing to their fibroblastic nature, but they are not identical. They display different differentiation capacities based on their tissue origin but do not “trans-differentiate” outside of their lineage, based on rigorous assays. For these reasons, the “MSC” term should be abandoned. Tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells provide the opportunity to devise methods for tissue regeneration by the cells themselves (tissue engineering). Their use in other forms of regenerative medicine based on paracrine, immunosuppressive, and immunomodulatory effects is far less clear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5399967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53999672017-05-09 “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use Robey, Pamela F1000Res Review The concept of a post-natal “mesenchymal stem cell” (“MSC”) originated from studies focused on bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), which are non-hematopoietic adherent cells, a subset of which are skeletal stem cells (SSCs), able to form cartilage, bone, hematopoiesis-supportive stroma, and marrow adipocytes based on rigorous clonal and differentiation assays. Subsequently, it was speculated that BMSCs could form other mesodermal derivatives and even cell types from other germ layers. Based on BMSC surface markers, representative of fibroblastic cells, and imprecise differentiation assays, it was further imagined that “MSCs” are ubiquitous and equipotent. However, “MSCs” do not have a common embryonic origin and are not a lineage, but recent studies indicate that they are tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells. These cells share cell surface features owing to their fibroblastic nature, but they are not identical. They display different differentiation capacities based on their tissue origin but do not “trans-differentiate” outside of their lineage, based on rigorous assays. For these reasons, the “MSC” term should be abandoned. Tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells provide the opportunity to devise methods for tissue regeneration by the cells themselves (tissue engineering). Their use in other forms of regenerative medicine based on paracrine, immunosuppressive, and immunomodulatory effects is far less clear. F1000Research 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5399967/ /pubmed/28491279 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10955.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Robey P http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The author(s) is/are employees of the US Government and therefore domestic copyright protection in USA does not apply to this work. The work may be protected under the copyright laws of other jurisdictions when used in those jurisdictions.
spellingShingle Review
Robey, Pamela
“Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title_full “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title_fullStr “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title_full_unstemmed “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title_short “Mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
title_sort “mesenchymal stem cells”: fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5399967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491279
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10955.1
work_keys_str_mv AT robeypamela mesenchymalstemcellsfactorfictionandimplicationsintheirtherapeuticuse