Cargando…

Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities

Embryonic mosaicism, defined as the presence of karyotypically distinct cell lines within an embryo, has been frequently reported with a high incidence in preimplantation embryos derived from IVF and is thought to be one of the major biological limitations for the routine application of PGD for aneu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capalbo, Antonio, Ubaldi, Filippo Maria, Rienzi, Laura, Scott, Richard, Treff, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27738115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew250
_version_ 1783230752913096704
author Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Rienzi, Laura
Scott, Richard
Treff, Nathan
author_facet Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Rienzi, Laura
Scott, Richard
Treff, Nathan
author_sort Capalbo, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Embryonic mosaicism, defined as the presence of karyotypically distinct cell lines within an embryo, has been frequently reported with a high incidence in preimplantation embryos derived from IVF and is thought to be one of the major biological limitations for the routine application of PGD for aneuploidies (PGD-A). The incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos is in fact reported to be between 4 and 90%. However, these data are in sharp contrast with what is known from clinical pregnancies, where true foetal mosaicism is observed in less than 0.5% of cases. Here, we challenge these previous observations in preimplantation embryos, presenting an alternative perspective, which also considers the impact of technical variation to diagnose mosaicism as one possible cause contributing to overestimation of the incidence of mosaicism in embryos. Although euploid/aneuploid mosaicism may be present in blastocysts, the possibility of detecting this phenomenon within a single trophectoderm biopsy represents a contemporary challenge to bring about improvement to the practice of PGD-A. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a critical review of the literature, provide a possible alternative interpretation of the data, and discuss future challenges with diagnosing mosaicism in PGD-A cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54000432017-04-28 Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Rienzi, Laura Scott, Richard Treff, Nathan Hum Reprod Opinion Embryonic mosaicism, defined as the presence of karyotypically distinct cell lines within an embryo, has been frequently reported with a high incidence in preimplantation embryos derived from IVF and is thought to be one of the major biological limitations for the routine application of PGD for aneuploidies (PGD-A). The incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos is in fact reported to be between 4 and 90%. However, these data are in sharp contrast with what is known from clinical pregnancies, where true foetal mosaicism is observed in less than 0.5% of cases. Here, we challenge these previous observations in preimplantation embryos, presenting an alternative perspective, which also considers the impact of technical variation to diagnose mosaicism as one possible cause contributing to overestimation of the incidence of mosaicism in embryos. Although euploid/aneuploid mosaicism may be present in blastocysts, the possibility of detecting this phenomenon within a single trophectoderm biopsy represents a contemporary challenge to bring about improvement to the practice of PGD-A. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a critical review of the literature, provide a possible alternative interpretation of the data, and discuss future challenges with diagnosing mosaicism in PGD-A cycles. Oxford University Press 2017-03 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5400043/ /pubmed/27738115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew250 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Opinion
Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Rienzi, Laura
Scott, Richard
Treff, Nathan
Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title_full Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title_fullStr Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title_full_unstemmed Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title_short Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
title_sort detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27738115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew250
work_keys_str_mv AT capalboantonio detectingmosaicismintrophectodermbiopsiescurrentchallengesandfuturepossibilities
AT ubaldifilippomaria detectingmosaicismintrophectodermbiopsiescurrentchallengesandfuturepossibilities
AT rienzilaura detectingmosaicismintrophectodermbiopsiescurrentchallengesandfuturepossibilities
AT scottrichard detectingmosaicismintrophectodermbiopsiescurrentchallengesandfuturepossibilities
AT treffnathan detectingmosaicismintrophectodermbiopsiescurrentchallengesandfuturepossibilities