Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines

Background   Should health systems invest more in access to care by expanding insurance coverage or in health care services including improving the quality of care? Comparing these options experimentally would shed light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of these strategies. Methods   The Quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peabody, John W, Quimbo, Stella, Florentino, Jhiedon, Shimkhada, Riti, Javier, Xylee, Paculdo, David, Jamison, Dean, Solon, Orville
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw179
_version_ 1783230753171046400
author Peabody, John W
Quimbo, Stella
Florentino, Jhiedon
Shimkhada, Riti
Javier, Xylee
Paculdo, David
Jamison, Dean
Solon, Orville
author_facet Peabody, John W
Quimbo, Stella
Florentino, Jhiedon
Shimkhada, Riti
Javier, Xylee
Paculdo, David
Jamison, Dean
Solon, Orville
author_sort Peabody, John W
collection PubMed
description Background   Should health systems invest more in access to care by expanding insurance coverage or in health care services including improving the quality of care? Comparing these options experimentally would shed light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of these strategies. Methods   The Quality Improvement Demonstration Study (QIDS) was a randomized policy experiment conducted across 30 districts in the Philippines. The study had a control group and two policy intervention groups intended to improve the health of young children. The demand-side intervention in QIDS was universal health insurance coverage (UHC) for children aged 5 years or younger, and a supply-side intervention, a pay-for-performance (P4P) bonus for all providers who met pre-determined quality levels. In this paper, we compare the impacts of these policies from the QIDS experiment on childhood wasting by calculating DALYs averted per US$spent. Results   The direct per capita costs to implement UHC and P4P are US$4.08 and US$1.98 higher, respectively, compared to control. DALYs due to wasting were reduced by 334,862 in UHC and 1,073,185 in P4P. When adjustments are made for the efficiency of higher quality, the DALYS averted per US$ spent is similar in the two arms, 1.56 and 1.58 for UHC and P4P, respectively. Since the P4P quality improvements touches all patients seen by qualifying providers (32% in UHC versus 100% in P4P), there is a larger reduction in DALYs. With similar programmatic costs for either intervention, in this study, each US$spent under P4P yielded 1.52 DALYs averted compared to the standard program, while UHC yielded only a 0.50 DALY reduction. Conclusion   P4P had a greater impact and was more cost-effective compared to UHC as measured by DALYs averted. While expanded insurance benefit ceilings affected only those who are covered, P4P incentivizes practice quality improvement regardless of whether children are insured or uninsured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54000452017-04-28 Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines Peabody, John W Quimbo, Stella Florentino, Jhiedon Shimkhada, Riti Javier, Xylee Paculdo, David Jamison, Dean Solon, Orville Health Policy Plan Original Articles Background   Should health systems invest more in access to care by expanding insurance coverage or in health care services including improving the quality of care? Comparing these options experimentally would shed light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of these strategies. Methods   The Quality Improvement Demonstration Study (QIDS) was a randomized policy experiment conducted across 30 districts in the Philippines. The study had a control group and two policy intervention groups intended to improve the health of young children. The demand-side intervention in QIDS was universal health insurance coverage (UHC) for children aged 5 years or younger, and a supply-side intervention, a pay-for-performance (P4P) bonus for all providers who met pre-determined quality levels. In this paper, we compare the impacts of these policies from the QIDS experiment on childhood wasting by calculating DALYs averted per US$spent. Results   The direct per capita costs to implement UHC and P4P are US$4.08 and US$1.98 higher, respectively, compared to control. DALYs due to wasting were reduced by 334,862 in UHC and 1,073,185 in P4P. When adjustments are made for the efficiency of higher quality, the DALYS averted per US$ spent is similar in the two arms, 1.56 and 1.58 for UHC and P4P, respectively. Since the P4P quality improvements touches all patients seen by qualifying providers (32% in UHC versus 100% in P4P), there is a larger reduction in DALYs. With similar programmatic costs for either intervention, in this study, each US$spent under P4P yielded 1.52 DALYs averted compared to the standard program, while UHC yielded only a 0.50 DALY reduction. Conclusion   P4P had a greater impact and was more cost-effective compared to UHC as measured by DALYs averted. While expanded insurance benefit ceilings affected only those who are covered, P4P incentivizes practice quality improvement regardless of whether children are insured or uninsured. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5400045/ /pubmed/28110265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw179 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Peabody, John W
Quimbo, Stella
Florentino, Jhiedon
Shimkhada, Riti
Javier, Xylee
Paculdo, David
Jamison, Dean
Solon, Orville
Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title_full Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title_short Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines
title_sort comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the philippines
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28110265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw179
work_keys_str_mv AT peabodyjohnw comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT quimbostella comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT florentinojhiedon comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT shimkhadariti comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT javierxylee comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT paculdodavid comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT jamisondean comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines
AT solonorville comparativeeffectivenessoftwodisparatepoliciesonchildhealthexperimentalevidencefromthephilippines