Cargando…

Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN:  Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective surgical option for patients with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or deformity. Although ACDF is generally safe, dysphagia is a common complication. Despite its high inci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shriver, Michael F., Lewis, Daniel J., Kshettry, Varun R., Rosenbaum, Benjamin P., Benzel, Edward C., Mroz, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583944
_version_ 1783230774019883008
author Shriver, Michael F.
Lewis, Daniel J.
Kshettry, Varun R.
Rosenbaum, Benjamin P.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
author_facet Shriver, Michael F.
Lewis, Daniel J.
Kshettry, Varun R.
Rosenbaum, Benjamin P.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
author_sort Shriver, Michael F.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN:  Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective surgical option for patients with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or deformity. Although ACDF is generally safe, dysphagia is a common complication. Despite its high incidence, prolonged postoperative dysphagia is poorly understood; its etiology remains relatively unknown, and its risk factors are widely debated. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies reporting complications for cervical diskectomy with plating. We recorded dysphagia events from all included studies and calculated effect summary values, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Q values, and I (2) values. RESULTS: Of the 7,780 retrieved articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. The overall dysphagia rate was 8.5% (95% CI 5.7 to 11.3%). The rate of moderate or severe dysphagia was 4.4% (0.4 to 8.4%). Follow-up times of <12, 12 to 24, and >24 months reported rates of 19.9% (6.0 to 33.7%), 7.0% (5.2 to 8.7%), and 7.6% (1.4 to 13.8%), respectively. Studies utilizing the Bazaz Dysphagia Score resulted in an increase in dysphagia diagnosis relative to studies with no outlined criteria (19.8%, 5.9 to 33.7% and 6.9%, 3.7 to 10.0%, respectively), indicating that the criteria used for dysphagia identification are critical. There was no difference in dysphagia rate with the use of autograft versus allograft. CONCLUSIONS: This review represents a comprehensive estimation of the actual incidence of dysphagia across a heterogeneous group of surgeons, patients, and criteria. The classification scheme for dysphagia varied significantly within the literature. To ensure its diagnosis and identification, we recommend the use of a standardized, well-outlined method for dysphagia diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54001682017-04-27 Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Shriver, Michael F. Lewis, Daniel J. Kshettry, Varun R. Rosenbaum, Benjamin P. Benzel, Edward C. Mroz, Thomas E. Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN:  Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective surgical option for patients with cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or deformity. Although ACDF is generally safe, dysphagia is a common complication. Despite its high incidence, prolonged postoperative dysphagia is poorly understood; its etiology remains relatively unknown, and its risk factors are widely debated. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies reporting complications for cervical diskectomy with plating. We recorded dysphagia events from all included studies and calculated effect summary values, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Q values, and I (2) values. RESULTS: Of the 7,780 retrieved articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. The overall dysphagia rate was 8.5% (95% CI 5.7 to 11.3%). The rate of moderate or severe dysphagia was 4.4% (0.4 to 8.4%). Follow-up times of <12, 12 to 24, and >24 months reported rates of 19.9% (6.0 to 33.7%), 7.0% (5.2 to 8.7%), and 7.6% (1.4 to 13.8%), respectively. Studies utilizing the Bazaz Dysphagia Score resulted in an increase in dysphagia diagnosis relative to studies with no outlined criteria (19.8%, 5.9 to 33.7% and 6.9%, 3.7 to 10.0%, respectively), indicating that the criteria used for dysphagia identification are critical. There was no difference in dysphagia rate with the use of autograft versus allograft. CONCLUSIONS: This review represents a comprehensive estimation of the actual incidence of dysphagia across a heterogeneous group of surgeons, patients, and criteria. The classification scheme for dysphagia varied significantly within the literature. To ensure its diagnosis and identification, we recommend the use of a standardized, well-outlined method for dysphagia diagnosis. SAGE Publications 2017-02-01 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5400168/ /pubmed/28451514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583944 Text en © Georg Thieme Verlag KG http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Shriver, Michael F.
Lewis, Daniel J.
Kshettry, Varun R.
Rosenbaum, Benjamin P.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Dysphagia Rates after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort dysphagia rates after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583944
work_keys_str_mv AT shrivermichaelf dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lewisdanielj dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kshettryvarunr dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rosenbaumbenjaminp dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benzeledwardc dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mrozthomase dysphagiaratesafteranteriorcervicaldiskectomyandfusionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis