Cargando…

Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears

BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions are rarely performed compared with that for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcome after isolated or multiligament PCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne, Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech, Lind, Martin Carøe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
29
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117700077
_version_ 1783230786023981056
author Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne
Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech
Lind, Martin Carøe
author_facet Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne
Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech
Lind, Martin Carøe
author_sort Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions are rarely performed compared with that for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcome after isolated or multiligament PCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent PCL reconstruction between 2002 and 2010 were included. Standardized follow-up was performed between 2012 and 2013 and consisted of subjective scores (Tegner activity score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score) and objective measures, including knee laxity (KT-1000), extension strength, and overall IKDC score. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients were identified, of which 172 were available for postoperative follow-up: 39.3% with isolated PCL and 60.7% with multiligament injury. One hundred ten patients were available to complete both clinical follow-up and subjective questionnaires; 62 patients returned the subjective questionnaires. Mean follow-up was 5.9 years (range, 3.1-9.7 years). KOOS scores at follow-up in the isolated PCL group by subscale were 74 (symptoms), 76 (pain), 80 (activities of daily living), 55 (sport), and 55 (quality of life). Scores for patients in the multiligament group were 73 (symptoms), 79 (pain), 82 (activities of daily living), 53 (sport), and 56 (quality of life). Tegner scores were 4.5 and 4.4, respectively, and subjective IKDC scores were 63.8 and 65.0. The mean side-to-side difference in knee laxity was 2.7 mm in the isolated PCL group compared with 2.8 mm in the multiligament group. At 1-year follow-up there were significant differences in KOOS outcome scores between the isolated PCL subgroup and the multiligament subgroup, but no differences at final follow-up. Twelve patients (5%) had PCL revision surgery within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Despite the type of injury, there were only minor differences in knee laxity and subjective outcome scores between the isolated PCL group and the multiligament group. The overall revision rate in this study was 5.2%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54002132017-04-27 Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech Lind, Martin Carøe Orthop J Sports Med 29 BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions are rarely performed compared with that for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcome after isolated or multiligament PCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent PCL reconstruction between 2002 and 2010 were included. Standardized follow-up was performed between 2012 and 2013 and consisted of subjective scores (Tegner activity score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score) and objective measures, including knee laxity (KT-1000), extension strength, and overall IKDC score. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients were identified, of which 172 were available for postoperative follow-up: 39.3% with isolated PCL and 60.7% with multiligament injury. One hundred ten patients were available to complete both clinical follow-up and subjective questionnaires; 62 patients returned the subjective questionnaires. Mean follow-up was 5.9 years (range, 3.1-9.7 years). KOOS scores at follow-up in the isolated PCL group by subscale were 74 (symptoms), 76 (pain), 80 (activities of daily living), 55 (sport), and 55 (quality of life). Scores for patients in the multiligament group were 73 (symptoms), 79 (pain), 82 (activities of daily living), 53 (sport), and 56 (quality of life). Tegner scores were 4.5 and 4.4, respectively, and subjective IKDC scores were 63.8 and 65.0. The mean side-to-side difference in knee laxity was 2.7 mm in the isolated PCL group compared with 2.8 mm in the multiligament group. At 1-year follow-up there were significant differences in KOOS outcome scores between the isolated PCL subgroup and the multiligament subgroup, but no differences at final follow-up. Twelve patients (5%) had PCL revision surgery within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Despite the type of injury, there were only minor differences in knee laxity and subjective outcome scores between the isolated PCL group and the multiligament group. The overall revision rate in this study was 5.2%. SAGE Publications 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5400213/ /pubmed/28451615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117700077 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 29
Mygind-Klavsen, Bjarne
Nielsen, Torsten Grønbech
Lind, Martin Carøe
Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title_full Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title_fullStr Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title_short Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction in Patients With Isolated and Combined PCL Tears
title_sort outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament (pcl) reconstruction in patients with isolated and combined pcl tears
topic 29
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117700077
work_keys_str_mv AT mygindklavsenbjarne outcomesafterposteriorcruciateligamentpclreconstructioninpatientswithisolatedandcombinedpcltears
AT nielsentorstengrønbech outcomesafterposteriorcruciateligamentpclreconstructioninpatientswithisolatedandcombinedpcltears
AT lindmartincarøe outcomesafterposteriorcruciateligamentpclreconstructioninpatientswithisolatedandcombinedpcltears