Cargando…

Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: A number of surgical techniques for managing tennis elbow have been described, one of the commonest (Nirschl & Pettrone. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 61(6A): 832-839) involves excising the affected portion of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin. The results of this technique, as we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroslak, Martin, Murrell, George A.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400216/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00120
_version_ 1783230786812510208
author Kroslak, Martin
Murrell, George A.C.
author_facet Kroslak, Martin
Murrell, George A.C.
author_sort Kroslak, Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A number of surgical techniques for managing tennis elbow have been described, one of the commonest (Nirschl & Pettrone. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 61(6A): 832-839) involves excising the affected portion of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin. The results of this technique, as well as most other described surgical techniques for this condition, have been reported as excellent, yet none have been compared with placebo surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial investigating the surgical excision of the macroscopically degenerated portion of ECRB (Nirschl technique; n=13) compared with a sham operation (skin incision and exposure of ECRB alone; n=13) to manage tennis elbow, in patients with tennis elbow for more than 6 months who failed at least two non-surgical modalities. The primary outcome measure was defined as patient rated frequency of elbow pain with activity at 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcome measures included patient rated frequency and severity of pain, functional outcomes, range of motion, epicondyle tenderness and strength at 6 months and >12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: The two groups were matched for age, gender, hand dominance and duration of symptoms. Both the surgery and placebo procedures improved patient rated pain frequency and severity, elbow stiffness, difficulty with picking up objects, twisting motions and overall elbow rating over 6 months and at >12 months (p<0.01). Both procedures also improved epicondyle tenderness, pronation-supination range, grip strength and modified ORI-TETS at 6 months (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups in any parameter at any stage. No side effects or complications were reported. The study was stopped before the calculated number of patients were enrolled, as a post-hoc analysis showed over 6500 patients would need to be recruited in each group to see a significant difference between the groups at 26 weeks, when measuring patient rated frequency of elbow pain with activity. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the surgical excision of the degenerative portion of ECRB offers no additional benefit over and above placebo surgery for the management of chronic tennis elbow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54002162017-05-24 Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Kroslak, Martin Murrell, George A.C. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: A number of surgical techniques for managing tennis elbow have been described, one of the commonest (Nirschl & Pettrone. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 61(6A): 832-839) involves excising the affected portion of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin. The results of this technique, as well as most other described surgical techniques for this condition, have been reported as excellent, yet none have been compared with placebo surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial investigating the surgical excision of the macroscopically degenerated portion of ECRB (Nirschl technique; n=13) compared with a sham operation (skin incision and exposure of ECRB alone; n=13) to manage tennis elbow, in patients with tennis elbow for more than 6 months who failed at least two non-surgical modalities. The primary outcome measure was defined as patient rated frequency of elbow pain with activity at 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcome measures included patient rated frequency and severity of pain, functional outcomes, range of motion, epicondyle tenderness and strength at 6 months and >12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: The two groups were matched for age, gender, hand dominance and duration of symptoms. Both the surgery and placebo procedures improved patient rated pain frequency and severity, elbow stiffness, difficulty with picking up objects, twisting motions and overall elbow rating over 6 months and at >12 months (p<0.01). Both procedures also improved epicondyle tenderness, pronation-supination range, grip strength and modified ORI-TETS at 6 months (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups in any parameter at any stage. No side effects or complications were reported. The study was stopped before the calculated number of patients were enrolled, as a post-hoc analysis showed over 6500 patients would need to be recruited in each group to see a significant difference between the groups at 26 weeks, when measuring patient rated frequency of elbow pain with activity. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the surgical excision of the degenerative portion of ECRB offers no additional benefit over and above placebo surgery for the management of chronic tennis elbow. SAGE Publications 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5400216/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00120 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Kroslak, Martin
Murrell, George A.C.
Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400216/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00120
work_keys_str_mv AT kroslakmartin surgicaltreatmentoflateralepicondylitisaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial
AT murrellgeorgeac surgicaltreatmentoflateralepicondylitisaprospectiverandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial