Cargando…

Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary (PTB) and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in smear-negative patients can be difficult. We assessed retrospectively the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF system (Xpert, Cepheid) in diagnosing smear-negative tuberculosis (TB), which represents the most common form of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, Giulia, Di Gregori, Valentina, Girometti, Nicolò, Tadolini, Marina, Bisognin, Francesco, Dal Monte, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28430807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176186
_version_ 1783230799819046912
author Lombardi, Giulia
Di Gregori, Valentina
Girometti, Nicolò
Tadolini, Marina
Bisognin, Francesco
Dal Monte, Paola
author_facet Lombardi, Giulia
Di Gregori, Valentina
Girometti, Nicolò
Tadolini, Marina
Bisognin, Francesco
Dal Monte, Paola
author_sort Lombardi, Giulia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary (PTB) and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in smear-negative patients can be difficult. We assessed retrospectively the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF system (Xpert, Cepheid) in diagnosing smear-negative tuberculosis (TB), which represents the most common form of TB in a low incidence setting. METHODS: Performance of Xpert was compared to acid-fast microscopic examination using Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain in patients with culture-confirmed TB. RESULTS: 386 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture-positive samples were detected out of 5170 specimens tested with smear microscopy, Xpert and culture: 323 were both culture- and Xpert-positive, and 63 culture-positive only. Of these, 234 (60.6%) were smear-negative. In addition Xpert detected 40 probable TB cases, based on clinical findings, which were culture-negative. Compared to culture, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 83.7% and a specificity of 99.1%; sensitivity was higher for respiratory samples (86.5%) than for non-respiratory samples (76.8%). Xpert sensitivity for smear-negative culture-confirmed TB was 73.1% and was not influenced by TB localization. As sensitivity of microscopy alone was poor (39.4%), Xpert improved both diagnosis of pulmonary TB (Δ = 36.5%) and extra-pulmonary TB (Δ = 63.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Xpert MTB/RIF is a sensitive method for rapid diagnosis of TB compared to the conventional ZN staining. Xpert can serve as a sensitive and time-saving diagnostic method for microbiological diagnosis of smear-negative TB in countries with a low TB prevalence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5400262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54002622017-05-12 Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF Lombardi, Giulia Di Gregori, Valentina Girometti, Nicolò Tadolini, Marina Bisognin, Francesco Dal Monte, Paola PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary (PTB) and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in smear-negative patients can be difficult. We assessed retrospectively the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF system (Xpert, Cepheid) in diagnosing smear-negative tuberculosis (TB), which represents the most common form of TB in a low incidence setting. METHODS: Performance of Xpert was compared to acid-fast microscopic examination using Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain in patients with culture-confirmed TB. RESULTS: 386 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) culture-positive samples were detected out of 5170 specimens tested with smear microscopy, Xpert and culture: 323 were both culture- and Xpert-positive, and 63 culture-positive only. Of these, 234 (60.6%) were smear-negative. In addition Xpert detected 40 probable TB cases, based on clinical findings, which were culture-negative. Compared to culture, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 83.7% and a specificity of 99.1%; sensitivity was higher for respiratory samples (86.5%) than for non-respiratory samples (76.8%). Xpert sensitivity for smear-negative culture-confirmed TB was 73.1% and was not influenced by TB localization. As sensitivity of microscopy alone was poor (39.4%), Xpert improved both diagnosis of pulmonary TB (Δ = 36.5%) and extra-pulmonary TB (Δ = 63.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Xpert MTB/RIF is a sensitive method for rapid diagnosis of TB compared to the conventional ZN staining. Xpert can serve as a sensitive and time-saving diagnostic method for microbiological diagnosis of smear-negative TB in countries with a low TB prevalence. Public Library of Science 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5400262/ /pubmed/28430807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176186 Text en © 2017 Lombardi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lombardi, Giulia
Di Gregori, Valentina
Girometti, Nicolò
Tadolini, Marina
Bisognin, Francesco
Dal Monte, Paola
Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title_full Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title_fullStr Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title_short Diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by Xpert MTB/RIF
title_sort diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis is greatly improved by xpert mtb/rif
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28430807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176186
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardigiulia diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif
AT digregorivalentina diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif
AT giromettinicolo diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif
AT tadolinimarina diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif
AT bisogninfrancesco diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif
AT dalmontepaola diagnosisofsmearnegativetuberculosisisgreatlyimprovedbyxpertmtbrif