Cargando…
Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly
This observational study was designed to assess whether routine measurement of outcomes using standard instruments is possible as part of clinical routine in care of the elderly, and to establish if such instruments are responsive to clinical change. Indices of functional status, cognitive function...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Physicians of London
1994
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7807432 |
_version_ | 1783230952695136256 |
---|---|
author | Parker, S G Du, X Bardsley, M J Goodfellow, J Cooper, R G Cleary, R Broughton, D Striet, C James, O F W |
author_facet | Parker, S G Du, X Bardsley, M J Goodfellow, J Cooper, R G Cleary, R Broughton, D Striet, C James, O F W |
author_sort | Parker, S G |
collection | PubMed |
description | This observational study was designed to assess whether routine measurement of outcomes using standard instruments is possible as part of clinical routine in care of the elderly, and to establish if such instruments are responsive to clinical change. Indices of functional status, cognitive function and subjective health status were collected routinely on admission and discharge in 540 inpatients and 340 patients attending a day hospital. Data collection became integrated into clinical routine. Response rates were generally good and yielded acceptably complete data. For inpatients, outcome was reflected by measurement of survival, physical function (Barthel index) and social status, each of these indicators showing significant change between admission and discharge. For day hospital patients, neither these, nor the Nottingham ADL scale, nor a health status indicator proved sufficiently responsive to clinical change to merit recommendation as outcome indicators for routine use in older patients. In ambulatory care in older patients, such as those attending a day hospital, new approaches are needed to measure clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5401018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1994 |
publisher | Royal College of Physicians of London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54010182019-01-22 Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly Parker, S G Du, X Bardsley, M J Goodfellow, J Cooper, R G Cleary, R Broughton, D Striet, C James, O F W J R Coll Physicians Lond Medical Audit This observational study was designed to assess whether routine measurement of outcomes using standard instruments is possible as part of clinical routine in care of the elderly, and to establish if such instruments are responsive to clinical change. Indices of functional status, cognitive function and subjective health status were collected routinely on admission and discharge in 540 inpatients and 340 patients attending a day hospital. Data collection became integrated into clinical routine. Response rates were generally good and yielded acceptably complete data. For inpatients, outcome was reflected by measurement of survival, physical function (Barthel index) and social status, each of these indicators showing significant change between admission and discharge. For day hospital patients, neither these, nor the Nottingham ADL scale, nor a health status indicator proved sufficiently responsive to clinical change to merit recommendation as outcome indicators for routine use in older patients. In ambulatory care in older patients, such as those attending a day hospital, new approaches are needed to measure clinical outcomes. Royal College of Physicians of London 1994 /pmc/articles/PMC5401018/ /pubmed/7807432 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1994 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Audit Parker, S G Du, X Bardsley, M J Goodfellow, J Cooper, R G Cleary, R Broughton, D Striet, C James, O F W Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title | Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title_full | Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title_fullStr | Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title_short | Measuring Outcomes in Care of the Elderly |
title_sort | measuring outcomes in care of the elderly |
topic | Medical Audit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7807432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkersg measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT dux measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT bardsleymj measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT goodfellowj measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT cooperrg measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT clearyr measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT broughtond measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT strietc measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly AT jamesofw measuringoutcomesincareoftheelderly |