Cargando…
Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience?
We looked at a series of death certificates completed by various grades of hospital clinicians, general practitioners (GPs) and pathologists. Specific error types were defined and identified in each group. In hospital it is still the pre-registration house officer who completes most of the death cer...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Physicians of London
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8847688 |
_version_ | 1783230996293877760 |
---|---|
author | James, D S Bull, A D |
author_facet | James, D S Bull, A D |
author_sort | James, D S |
collection | PubMed |
description | We looked at a series of death certificates completed by various grades of hospital clinicians, general practitioners (GPs) and pathologists. Specific error types were defined and identified in each group. In hospital it is still the pre-registration house officer who completes most of the death certificates. Senior hospital doctors make more errors than their juniors while GPs and pathologists make fewest errors. Even amongst pathologists 11% of certificates recorded no adequate underlying cause of death, 85.7% failed to record organisms identified and 76.7% failed to record the site or histological type of tumours. This agrees with other studies that show that inaccuracies in death certificates arise from inadequate formulation of cause of death and failure to record relevant information. It reveals that little heed has been paid to the recommendation in the joint report of the Royal College of Physicians and Pathologists that senior doctors should be more involved in certification—the frequency of errors in this group suggests that it might not, in any case, lead to a great improvement. The number of errors made by GPs and pathologists suggests that even practitioners with clinical experience and regular exposure to certification frequently make errors. The reasons for this are discussed and possible solutions proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5401209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Royal College of Physicians of London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54012092019-01-22 Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? James, D S Bull, A D J R Coll Physicians Lond Education and Training We looked at a series of death certificates completed by various grades of hospital clinicians, general practitioners (GPs) and pathologists. Specific error types were defined and identified in each group. In hospital it is still the pre-registration house officer who completes most of the death certificates. Senior hospital doctors make more errors than their juniors while GPs and pathologists make fewest errors. Even amongst pathologists 11% of certificates recorded no adequate underlying cause of death, 85.7% failed to record organisms identified and 76.7% failed to record the site or histological type of tumours. This agrees with other studies that show that inaccuracies in death certificates arise from inadequate formulation of cause of death and failure to record relevant information. It reveals that little heed has been paid to the recommendation in the joint report of the Royal College of Physicians and Pathologists that senior doctors should be more involved in certification—the frequency of errors in this group suggests that it might not, in any case, lead to a great improvement. The number of errors made by GPs and pathologists suggests that even practitioners with clinical experience and regular exposure to certification frequently make errors. The reasons for this are discussed and possible solutions proposed. Royal College of Physicians of London 1995 /pmc/articles/PMC5401209/ /pubmed/8847688 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1995 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Education and Training James, D S Bull, A D Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title | Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title_full | Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title_fullStr | Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title_full_unstemmed | Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title_short | Adequacy of Death Certification: Is Correct Formulation of Cause of Death Related to Seniority or Experience? |
title_sort | adequacy of death certification: is correct formulation of cause of death related to seniority or experience? |
topic | Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8847688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesds adequacyofdeathcertificationiscorrectformulationofcauseofdeathrelatedtoseniorityorexperience AT bullad adequacyofdeathcertificationiscorrectformulationofcauseofdeathrelatedtoseniorityorexperience |