Cargando…
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other?
Research ethics committees have to ensure that research projects are asking sensible questions and are designed so that the questions will be answered, that the research subjects who are involved will not come to unnecessary harm, and that the autonomy of the research subjects will be respected. Whe...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Physicians of London
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7473327 |
_version_ | 1783231025258692608 |
---|---|
author | Foster, Claire |
author_facet | Foster, Claire |
author_sort | Foster, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research ethics committees have to ensure that research projects are asking sensible questions and are designed so that the questions will be answered, that the research subjects who are involved will not come to unnecessary harm, and that the autonomy of the research subjects will be respected. Where research proposals cannot fulfil all these criteria, research ethics committees have to perform a delicate balancing act amongst competing moral claims. These arise when, for example, the research is non-therapeutic or the research subjects are incompetent to give consent. Given that the balance of conclusions is so sensitive, it is hardly surprising that different committees sometimes disagree with each other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5401337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Royal College of Physicians of London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54013372019-01-22 Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? Foster, Claire J R Coll Physicians Lond Medical Ethics Research ethics committees have to ensure that research projects are asking sensible questions and are designed so that the questions will be answered, that the research subjects who are involved will not come to unnecessary harm, and that the autonomy of the research subjects will be respected. Where research proposals cannot fulfil all these criteria, research ethics committees have to perform a delicate balancing act amongst competing moral claims. These arise when, for example, the research is non-therapeutic or the research subjects are incompetent to give consent. Given that the balance of conclusions is so sensitive, it is hardly surprising that different committees sometimes disagree with each other. Royal College of Physicians of London 1995 /pmc/articles/PMC5401337/ /pubmed/7473327 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1995 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Ethics Foster, Claire Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title | Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title_full | Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title_fullStr | Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title_short | Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other? |
title_sort | why do research ethics committees disagree with each other? |
topic | Medical Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7473327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fosterclaire whydoresearchethicscommitteesdisagreewitheachother |