Cargando…

Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?

OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme chara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Neil C, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Ritchie, Lewis D, Rawles, John M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Physicians of London 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8961204
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme characteristics with key personnel from identified cardiac rehabilitation schemes. OUTCOME MEASURES: patient provision, referral criteria and programme features. RESULTS: 65 programmes provided outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for 4,980 patients in one year, representing 17% of the 29,180 patients who survived admission to hospital with coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation practice varied widely: 53 (82%) programmes included exercise, although only 19 (29%) at the most beneficial level; 40 (62%) included relaxation training, although only three (5%) at a level shown to give benefit; 47 (72%) included education, although only 16 (25%) in a manner with reported benefits in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was provided to a minority of patients with coronary heart disease. Programmes varied widely, and were often more limited than those reporting mortality and morbidity benefits in randomised trials. There is a substantial gap between current provision and practice of cardiac rehabilitation and that advocated in published guidelines.