Cargando…

Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?

OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme chara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Neil C, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Ritchie, Lewis D, Rawles, John M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Physicians of London 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8961204
_version_ 1783231057995235328
author Campbell, Neil C
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Ritchie, Lewis D
Rawles, John M
author_facet Campbell, Neil C
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Ritchie, Lewis D
Rawles, John M
author_sort Campbell, Neil C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme characteristics with key personnel from identified cardiac rehabilitation schemes. OUTCOME MEASURES: patient provision, referral criteria and programme features. RESULTS: 65 programmes provided outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for 4,980 patients in one year, representing 17% of the 29,180 patients who survived admission to hospital with coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation practice varied widely: 53 (82%) programmes included exercise, although only 19 (29%) at the most beneficial level; 40 (62%) included relaxation training, although only three (5%) at a level shown to give benefit; 47 (72%) included education, although only 16 (25%) in a manner with reported benefits in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was provided to a minority of patients with coronary heart disease. Programmes varied widely, and were often more limited than those reporting mortality and morbidity benefits in randomised trials. There is a substantial gap between current provision and practice of cardiac rehabilitation and that advocated in published guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5401477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Royal College of Physicians of London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54014772019-01-22 Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised? Campbell, Neil C Grimshaw, Jeremy M Ritchie, Lewis D Rawles, John M J R Coll Physicians Lond Original Papers OBJECTIVE: to give a comprehensive description of the practice of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Scotland. DESIGN: an identifying survey of 1,270 individuals in hospital, general practice and community sources nationally, followed by computer-assisted telephone interviews about programme characteristics with key personnel from identified cardiac rehabilitation schemes. OUTCOME MEASURES: patient provision, referral criteria and programme features. RESULTS: 65 programmes provided outpatient cardiac rehabilitation for 4,980 patients in one year, representing 17% of the 29,180 patients who survived admission to hospital with coronary heart disease. Cardiac rehabilitation practice varied widely: 53 (82%) programmes included exercise, although only 19 (29%) at the most beneficial level; 40 (62%) included relaxation training, although only three (5%) at a level shown to give benefit; 47 (72%) included education, although only 16 (25%) in a manner with reported benefits in randomised trials. CONCLUSIONS: outpatient cardiac rehabilitation was provided to a minority of patients with coronary heart disease. Programmes varied widely, and were often more limited than those reporting mortality and morbidity benefits in randomised trials. There is a substantial gap between current provision and practice of cardiac rehabilitation and that advocated in published guidelines. Royal College of Physicians of London 1996 /pmc/articles/PMC5401477/ /pubmed/8961204 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1996 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Campbell, Neil C
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Ritchie, Lewis D
Rawles, John M
Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title_full Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title_fullStr Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title_full_unstemmed Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title_short Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: Are the Potential Benefits Being Realised?
title_sort outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: are the potential benefits being realised?
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8961204
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellneilc outpatientcardiacrehabilitationarethepotentialbenefitsbeingrealised
AT grimshawjeremym outpatientcardiacrehabilitationarethepotentialbenefitsbeingrealised
AT ritchielewisd outpatientcardiacrehabilitationarethepotentialbenefitsbeingrealised
AT rawlesjohnm outpatientcardiacrehabilitationarethepotentialbenefitsbeingrealised