Cargando…

Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients

Standardised scales recommended by a joint working party from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and The British Geriatrics Society (BGS) in 1992 for the assessment of elderly hospitalised patients were employed in an elderly hip fracture population to investigate their feasibility and usefulness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, S M, Prescott, R J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Physicians of London 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8875380
_version_ 1783231082035937280
author Shepherd, S M
Prescott, R J
author_facet Shepherd, S M
Prescott, R J
author_sort Shepherd, S M
collection PubMed
description Standardised scales recommended by a joint working party from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and The British Geriatrics Society (BGS) in 1992 for the assessment of elderly hospitalised patients were employed in an elderly hip fracture population to investigate their feasibility and usefulness in this group. Patients were assessed at the time of their fracture and one, six and 12 months later. An informant was invited to provide information on behalf of patients (39%) who were classified as having significant memory and cognitive impairment (Abbreviated Mental Test score < 7) or if they had some other communication difficulty. Patients and informants found the format and content of the scales acceptable as well as the administration time of around one hour. Difficulties with the depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) and quality of life (Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale) scales were due to some patients' digressions, and the fact that little change was noted in the scores over the one-year period of follow-up questions their sensitivity. In the cohort of survivors 31% were classified as being depressed at baseline (score > 5) and this rose to 36% at one year. Ten per cent of the surviving patients were classed as dependent by the Barthel Index at the time of their fracture (score < 12) and this increased to 24% at one year. Despite exhibiting a ceiling effect, this scale was the most responsive of the scales at all time points. The social checklist highlighted important aspects for the management of hip fracture patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5401580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1996
publisher Royal College of Physicians of London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54015802019-01-22 Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients Shepherd, S M Prescott, R J J R Coll Physicians Lond Original Papers Standardised scales recommended by a joint working party from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and The British Geriatrics Society (BGS) in 1992 for the assessment of elderly hospitalised patients were employed in an elderly hip fracture population to investigate their feasibility and usefulness in this group. Patients were assessed at the time of their fracture and one, six and 12 months later. An informant was invited to provide information on behalf of patients (39%) who were classified as having significant memory and cognitive impairment (Abbreviated Mental Test score < 7) or if they had some other communication difficulty. Patients and informants found the format and content of the scales acceptable as well as the administration time of around one hour. Difficulties with the depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) and quality of life (Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale) scales were due to some patients' digressions, and the fact that little change was noted in the scores over the one-year period of follow-up questions their sensitivity. In the cohort of survivors 31% were classified as being depressed at baseline (score > 5) and this rose to 36% at one year. Ten per cent of the surviving patients were classed as dependent by the Barthel Index at the time of their fracture (score < 12) and this increased to 24% at one year. Despite exhibiting a ceiling effect, this scale was the most responsive of the scales at all time points. The social checklist highlighted important aspects for the management of hip fracture patients. Royal College of Physicians of London 1996 /pmc/articles/PMC5401580/ /pubmed/8875380 Text en © Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1996 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits non-commercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Shepherd, S M
Prescott, R J
Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title_full Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title_fullStr Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title_short Use of Standardised Assessment Scales in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients
title_sort use of standardised assessment scales in elderly hip fracture patients
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8875380
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdsm useofstandardisedassessmentscalesinelderlyhipfracturepatients
AT prescottrj useofstandardisedassessmentscalesinelderlyhipfracturepatients