Cargando…

Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments

The aim of the current study was to analyse the planktonic growth of Streptococcus mutans on the surfaces of three implants retrieved after three different peri-implantitis treatments. Three implants from a male patient with high levels of bone loss were treated by mechanical debridement, chemical d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geremias, Thaise C., Montero, Juan F. D., Magini, Ricardo de Souza, Schuldt Filho, Guenther, de Magalhães, Edival Barreto, Bianchini, Marco A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28487780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8562050
_version_ 1783231103414304768
author Geremias, Thaise C.
Montero, Juan F. D.
Magini, Ricardo de Souza
Schuldt Filho, Guenther
de Magalhães, Edival Barreto
Bianchini, Marco A.
author_facet Geremias, Thaise C.
Montero, Juan F. D.
Magini, Ricardo de Souza
Schuldt Filho, Guenther
de Magalhães, Edival Barreto
Bianchini, Marco A.
author_sort Geremias, Thaise C.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the current study was to analyse the planktonic growth of Streptococcus mutans on the surfaces of three implants retrieved after three different peri-implantitis treatments. Three implants from a male patient with high levels of bone loss were treated by mechanical debridement, chemical decontamination, and implantoplasty. After 4 months of follow-up, the implants were removed. The growth and biofilm formation were measured by spectrophotometry (OD(630 nm)) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), after 48 hours of incubation. Results showed an average of Streptococcus mutans planktonic growth over the implants of 0.21 nm (mechanical debridement), 0.16 nm (chemical decontamination), and 0.15 nm (implantoplasty). Data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05 for chemical decontamination and implantoplasty). Implantoplasty and chemical decontamination showed the lowest levels of planktonic growth, indicating a possible influence of the modification procedures on the titanium surface on the initial biofilm attachment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5401748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54017482017-05-09 Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments Geremias, Thaise C. Montero, Juan F. D. Magini, Ricardo de Souza Schuldt Filho, Guenther de Magalhães, Edival Barreto Bianchini, Marco A. Case Rep Dent Case Report The aim of the current study was to analyse the planktonic growth of Streptococcus mutans on the surfaces of three implants retrieved after three different peri-implantitis treatments. Three implants from a male patient with high levels of bone loss were treated by mechanical debridement, chemical decontamination, and implantoplasty. After 4 months of follow-up, the implants were removed. The growth and biofilm formation were measured by spectrophotometry (OD(630 nm)) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), after 48 hours of incubation. Results showed an average of Streptococcus mutans planktonic growth over the implants of 0.21 nm (mechanical debridement), 0.16 nm (chemical decontamination), and 0.15 nm (implantoplasty). Data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05 for chemical decontamination and implantoplasty). Implantoplasty and chemical decontamination showed the lowest levels of planktonic growth, indicating a possible influence of the modification procedures on the titanium surface on the initial biofilm attachment. Hindawi 2017 2017-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5401748/ /pubmed/28487780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8562050 Text en Copyright © 2017 Thaise C. Geremias et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Geremias, Thaise C.
Montero, Juan F. D.
Magini, Ricardo de Souza
Schuldt Filho, Guenther
de Magalhães, Edival Barreto
Bianchini, Marco A.
Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title_full Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title_fullStr Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title_full_unstemmed Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title_short Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments
title_sort biofilm analysis of retrieved dental implants after different peri-implantitis treatments
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5401748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28487780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8562050
work_keys_str_mv AT geremiasthaisec biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments
AT monterojuanfd biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments
AT maginiricardodesouza biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments
AT schuldtfilhoguenther biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments
AT demagalhaesedivalbarreto biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments
AT bianchinimarcoa biofilmanalysisofretrieveddentalimplantsafterdifferentperiimplantitistreatments