Cargando…

Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference

Racial difference of religiosity in a heterogeneous older population had long been a focal point of gerontological research. However, most religiosity measures were developed from homogenous sample, few underwent rigorous psychometric validation, and studies on racial difference of religiosity had b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Chengwu, Ford, Marvella E., Tilley, Barbara C., Greene, Ruth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004257
_version_ 1783231241275834368
author Yang, Chengwu
Ford, Marvella E.
Tilley, Barbara C.
Greene, Ruth L.
author_facet Yang, Chengwu
Ford, Marvella E.
Tilley, Barbara C.
Greene, Ruth L.
author_sort Yang, Chengwu
collection PubMed
description Racial difference of religiosity in a heterogeneous older population had long been a focal point of gerontological research. However, most religiosity measures were developed from homogenous sample, few underwent rigorous psychometric validation, and studies on racial difference of religiosity had been obstructed. This cross-sectional study adapted a religiosity measure originally designed for blacks only to a heterogeneous older population of blacks and whites, validated its psychometric properties, and examined racial difference of religiosity. Based on qualitative research of concepts, intensive literature review, and abundant experiences in this field, we adapted the original measure. Then, using the data collected from a survey of 196 black and white Americans 55 years and older in Charlotte, North Carolina, we investigated full-scale psychometric properties of the adapted measure at the item-, domain-, and measure- level. These psychometric validations included item analysis, item-scale correlations, correlation matrix among items, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to determine if the original factor structure held after adaptation, and reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha. Finally, using Multiple Indicators and MultIple Causes (MIMIC) models, we examined racial difference of religiosity through regression with latent variables, while potential measurement bias by race through differential item functioning (DIF) was adjusted in the MIMIC models. In result, we successfully adapted the original 12-item religiosity measure for blacks into an 8-item version for blacks and whites. Although sacrificed few reliability for brevity, the adapted measure demonstrated sound psychometric properties, and retained the original factor structure. We also found racial differences of religiosity in all three domains of the measure, even after adjustment of the detected measurement biases in two domains. In conclusion, the original measure can be adapted to and validated for a heterogeneous older population of blacks and whites. Although the adapted measure can be used to measure the three domains of religiosity in blacks and whites, the observed racial differences of religiosity need to be adjusted for measurement biases before meaningful comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5402544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54025442017-04-27 Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference Yang, Chengwu Ford, Marvella E. Tilley, Barbara C. Greene, Ruth L. Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 Racial difference of religiosity in a heterogeneous older population had long been a focal point of gerontological research. However, most religiosity measures were developed from homogenous sample, few underwent rigorous psychometric validation, and studies on racial difference of religiosity had been obstructed. This cross-sectional study adapted a religiosity measure originally designed for blacks only to a heterogeneous older population of blacks and whites, validated its psychometric properties, and examined racial difference of religiosity. Based on qualitative research of concepts, intensive literature review, and abundant experiences in this field, we adapted the original measure. Then, using the data collected from a survey of 196 black and white Americans 55 years and older in Charlotte, North Carolina, we investigated full-scale psychometric properties of the adapted measure at the item-, domain-, and measure- level. These psychometric validations included item analysis, item-scale correlations, correlation matrix among items, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to determine if the original factor structure held after adaptation, and reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha. Finally, using Multiple Indicators and MultIple Causes (MIMIC) models, we examined racial difference of religiosity through regression with latent variables, while potential measurement bias by race through differential item functioning (DIF) was adjusted in the MIMIC models. In result, we successfully adapted the original 12-item religiosity measure for blacks into an 8-item version for blacks and whites. Although sacrificed few reliability for brevity, the adapted measure demonstrated sound psychometric properties, and retained the original factor structure. We also found racial differences of religiosity in all three domains of the measure, even after adjustment of the detected measurement biases in two domains. In conclusion, the original measure can be adapted to and validated for a heterogeneous older population of blacks and whites. Although the adapted measure can be used to measure the three domains of religiosity in blacks and whites, the observed racial differences of religiosity need to be adjusted for measurement biases before meaningful comparisons. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5402544/ /pubmed/27631201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004257 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5400
Yang, Chengwu
Ford, Marvella E.
Tilley, Barbara C.
Greene, Ruth L.
Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title_full Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title_fullStr Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title_full_unstemmed Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title_short Religiosity in black and white older Americans: Measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
title_sort religiosity in black and white older americans: measure adaptation, psychometric validation, and racial difference
topic 5400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004257
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchengwu religiosityinblackandwhiteolderamericansmeasureadaptationpsychometricvalidationandracialdifference
AT fordmarvellae religiosityinblackandwhiteolderamericansmeasureadaptationpsychometricvalidationandracialdifference
AT tilleybarbarac religiosityinblackandwhiteolderamericansmeasureadaptationpsychometricvalidationandracialdifference
AT greeneruthl religiosityinblackandwhiteolderamericansmeasureadaptationpsychometricvalidationandracialdifference