Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis

For percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types in chronic pain wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Sang Ho, Park, Jun Young, Cho, Seong-Sik, Cho, Hyun-Seok, Lee, Jae-Young, Kim, Yeon Ju, Choi, Seong-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004647
_version_ 1783231244433096704
author Moon, Sang Ho
Park, Jun Young
Cho, Seong-Sik
Cho, Hyun-Seok
Lee, Jae-Young
Kim, Yeon Ju
Choi, Seong-Soo
author_facet Moon, Sang Ho
Park, Jun Young
Cho, Seong-Sik
Cho, Hyun-Seok
Lee, Jae-Young
Kim, Yeon Ju
Choi, Seong-Soo
author_sort Moon, Sang Ho
collection PubMed
description For percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types in chronic pain with lumbosacral herniated intervertebral disc (L-HIVD). A total of 1158 chronic low back and/or leg pain patients who diagnosed with L-HIVD and underwent PEA between February 2011 and March 2015 were retrospectively examined. All enrolled patients were divided into 2 types: dome-sacral type and flat type. To avoid confounding bias, propensity score analysis was used. Numeric rating scales (NRS) and Patients’ Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were compared between the 2 types at baseline and at 3 months post-PEA. After conducting a propensity score matching analysis, 114 patients were included in each type. The mean sacral angle significantly differed between the flat-sacral and dome-sacral types (P < 0.001). A linear mixed effect model analysis showed that the adjusted NRS score at baseline was 7.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.40–7.76] for the flat-sacral type and 7.47 (95% CI: 7.29–7.64) for the dome-sacral type. The adjusted NRS score after 3 months post-PEA was 4.27 (95% CI: 3.77–4.77) for the flat-sacral type and 3.71 (95% CI: 3.21–4.21) for the dome-sacral type. We detected no significant differences in NRS at baseline (P = 0.371) and after 3 months (P = 0.121) between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of the NRS score between the 2 groups during the 3 months follow-up (omnibus P = 0.223). There were no significant differences in PGIC between flat-sacral and dome-sacral types at 3 months after the follow-up period (4.40 ± 2.17 and 4.67 ± 1.88, respectively, P = 0.431). PEA provides sufficient pain relief for chronic pain due to L-HIVD at 3 months postprocedure. The sacral type might not affect the outcome of lumbar PEA in chronic pain associated lumbar HIVD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5402556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54025562017-04-27 Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis Moon, Sang Ho Park, Jun Young Cho, Seong-Sik Cho, Hyun-Seok Lee, Jae-Young Kim, Yeon Ju Choi, Seong-Soo Medicine (Baltimore) 3200 For percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain, comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of lumbar PEA between the sacral types in chronic pain with lumbosacral herniated intervertebral disc (L-HIVD). A total of 1158 chronic low back and/or leg pain patients who diagnosed with L-HIVD and underwent PEA between February 2011 and March 2015 were retrospectively examined. All enrolled patients were divided into 2 types: dome-sacral type and flat type. To avoid confounding bias, propensity score analysis was used. Numeric rating scales (NRS) and Patients’ Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were compared between the 2 types at baseline and at 3 months post-PEA. After conducting a propensity score matching analysis, 114 patients were included in each type. The mean sacral angle significantly differed between the flat-sacral and dome-sacral types (P < 0.001). A linear mixed effect model analysis showed that the adjusted NRS score at baseline was 7.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.40–7.76] for the flat-sacral type and 7.47 (95% CI: 7.29–7.64) for the dome-sacral type. The adjusted NRS score after 3 months post-PEA was 4.27 (95% CI: 3.77–4.77) for the flat-sacral type and 3.71 (95% CI: 3.21–4.21) for the dome-sacral type. We detected no significant differences in NRS at baseline (P = 0.371) and after 3 months (P = 0.121) between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of the NRS score between the 2 groups during the 3 months follow-up (omnibus P = 0.223). There were no significant differences in PGIC between flat-sacral and dome-sacral types at 3 months after the follow-up period (4.40 ± 2.17 and 4.67 ± 1.88, respectively, P = 0.431). PEA provides sufficient pain relief for chronic pain due to L-HIVD at 3 months postprocedure. The sacral type might not affect the outcome of lumbar PEA in chronic pain associated lumbar HIVD. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5402556/ /pubmed/27631213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004647 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 3200
Moon, Sang Ho
Park, Jun Young
Cho, Seong-Sik
Cho, Hyun-Seok
Lee, Jae-Young
Kim, Yeon Ju
Choi, Seong-Soo
Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: A propensity score matching analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis for different sacrum types in patients with chronic pain due to lumbar disc herniation: a propensity score matching analysis
topic 3200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27631213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004647
work_keys_str_mv AT moonsangho comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT parkjunyoung comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT choseongsik comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chohyunseok comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT leejaeyoung comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT kimyeonju comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT choiseongsoo comparativeeffectivenessofpercutaneousepiduraladhesiolysisfordifferentsacrumtypesinpatientswithchronicpainduetolumbardischerniationapropensityscorematchinganalysis