Cargando…
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Despite all the evidence corroborating the selective use of episiotomy and although routine use of the procedure is contraindicated, there are no evidences corroborating if episiotomy is necessary in any circumstance. The present clinical randomized trial was performed to compare materna...
Autores principales: | M. Amorim, M., Coutinho, Isabela Cristina, Melo, Inês, Katz, Leila |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
por: Amorim, Melania M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial
por: Melo, Inês, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?
por: Zilberman, Ayala, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
por: Sawant, Ganpat, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Episiotomy
Publicado: (1885)