Cargando…
A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases
BACKGROUND: Twelve years ago, a randomized trial demonstrated that a radiosurgery boost added to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improved intracerebral control (IC) in patients with one to three cerebral metastases. Overall survival (OS) was improved only in the subgroup of patients with a single me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0804-1 |
_version_ | 1783231266972237824 |
---|---|
author | Rades, Dirk Janssen, Stefan Bajrovic, Amira Khoa, Mai Trong Veninga, Theo Schild, Steven E. |
author_facet | Rades, Dirk Janssen, Stefan Bajrovic, Amira Khoa, Mai Trong Veninga, Theo Schild, Steven E. |
author_sort | Rades, Dirk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Twelve years ago, a randomized trial demonstrated that a radiosurgery boost added to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improved intracerebral control (IC) in patients with one to three cerebral metastases. Overall survival (OS) was improved only in the subgroup of patients with a single metastasis but not in the entire cohort. The present study compared both regimens in a different scenario outside a randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 252 patients with one to three cerebral metastases were included. Eighty-four patients receiving WBRT plus a planned stereotactic boost and 168 patients receiving WBRT alone were individually matched 1:2 for nine factors including fractionation of WBRT, age, gender, performance score, primary tumor, number of cerebral metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, and time between cancer diagnosis and WBRT. Each group of three patients was required to match for all nine factors. Both groups were compared for IC and OS. RESULTS: IC rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 88, 71, 45 and 22% after WBRT plus stereotactic boost vs. 75, 48, 38 and 22% after WBRT alone (p = 0.005). OS rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 76, 53, 32 and 25% after WBRT plus stereotactic boost and 67, 45, 29 and 20% after WBRT alone (p = 0.10). In patients with a single lesion, OS rates were also not significantly different (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the previous randomized trial from 2004, this matched-pair study showed that a stereotactic boost in addition to WBRT significantly improved IC but not OS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5402642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54026422017-04-27 A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases Rades, Dirk Janssen, Stefan Bajrovic, Amira Khoa, Mai Trong Veninga, Theo Schild, Steven E. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Twelve years ago, a randomized trial demonstrated that a radiosurgery boost added to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) improved intracerebral control (IC) in patients with one to three cerebral metastases. Overall survival (OS) was improved only in the subgroup of patients with a single metastasis but not in the entire cohort. The present study compared both regimens in a different scenario outside a randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 252 patients with one to three cerebral metastases were included. Eighty-four patients receiving WBRT plus a planned stereotactic boost and 168 patients receiving WBRT alone were individually matched 1:2 for nine factors including fractionation of WBRT, age, gender, performance score, primary tumor, number of cerebral metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, and time between cancer diagnosis and WBRT. Each group of three patients was required to match for all nine factors. Both groups were compared for IC and OS. RESULTS: IC rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 88, 71, 45 and 22% after WBRT plus stereotactic boost vs. 75, 48, 38 and 22% after WBRT alone (p = 0.005). OS rates at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 76, 53, 32 and 25% after WBRT plus stereotactic boost and 67, 45, 29 and 20% after WBRT alone (p = 0.10). In patients with a single lesion, OS rates were also not significantly different (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the previous randomized trial from 2004, this matched-pair study showed that a stereotactic boost in addition to WBRT significantly improved IC but not OS. BioMed Central 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5402642/ /pubmed/28438175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0804-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Rades, Dirk Janssen, Stefan Bajrovic, Amira Khoa, Mai Trong Veninga, Theo Schild, Steven E. A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title | A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title_full | A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title_fullStr | A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title_short | A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
title_sort | matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy with and without a stereotactic boost for intracerebral control and overall survival in patients with one to three cerebral metastases |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0804-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radesdirk amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT janssenstefan amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT bajrovicamira amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT khoamaitrong amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT veningatheo amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT schildstevene amatchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT radesdirk matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT janssenstefan matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT bajrovicamira matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT khoamaitrong matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT veningatheo matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases AT schildstevene matchedpairanalysiscomparingwholebrainradiotherapywithandwithoutastereotacticboostforintracerebralcontrolandoverallsurvivalinpatientswithonetothreecerebralmetastases |