Cargando…
Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve. METHODS: We searched the PubMed (1992–2016), Cochrane Library (1999–2016), W...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28437434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175985 |
_version_ | 1783231340143968256 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ruolin Lin, Shouren Wang, Yong Qian, Weiping Zhou, Liang |
author_facet | Wang, Ruolin Lin, Shouren Wang, Yong Qian, Weiping Zhou, Liang |
author_sort | Wang, Ruolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve. METHODS: We searched the PubMed (1992–2016), Cochrane Library (1999–2016), Web of Science (1950–2016), Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979–2016), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1994–2016). Any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared GnRH-ant protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included, and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (6399 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Stimulation days (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = -0.8 [-1.36, -0.23], P = 0.006), gonadotrophin (Gn) dosage (MD [95% CI] = -3.52 [-5.56, -1.48], P = 0.0007), estradiol (E2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (MD [95% CI] = -365.49 [-532.93, -198.05], P<0.0001), the number of oocytes retrieved (MD [95% CI] = -1.41 [-1.84, -0.99], P<0.00001), the embryos obtained (MD [95% CI] = -0.99 [-1.38, -0.59], P<0.00001), incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.57, 0.83], P<0.0001) were statistically significantly lower in GnRH-ant protocol than GnRH-a long protocol. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.80, 1.01], P = 0.08), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.77, 1.00], P = 0.05), live birth rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.74, 1.09], P = 0.27), miscarriage rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.98 [0.69, 1.40], P = 0.93), and cycle cancellation rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.52, 1.44], P = 0.57) showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: GnRH-ant protocol substantially decreased the incidence of OHSS without influencing the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to GnRH-a long protocol among patients with normal ovarian reserve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5402978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54029782017-05-12 Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Ruolin Lin, Shouren Wang, Yong Qian, Weiping Zhou, Liang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve. METHODS: We searched the PubMed (1992–2016), Cochrane Library (1999–2016), Web of Science (1950–2016), Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979–2016), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1994–2016). Any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared GnRH-ant protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included, and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RCTs (6399 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Stimulation days (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = -0.8 [-1.36, -0.23], P = 0.006), gonadotrophin (Gn) dosage (MD [95% CI] = -3.52 [-5.56, -1.48], P = 0.0007), estradiol (E2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (MD [95% CI] = -365.49 [-532.93, -198.05], P<0.0001), the number of oocytes retrieved (MD [95% CI] = -1.41 [-1.84, -0.99], P<0.00001), the embryos obtained (MD [95% CI] = -0.99 [-1.38, -0.59], P<0.00001), incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR [95% CI] = 0.69 [0.57, 0.83], P<0.0001) were statistically significantly lower in GnRH-ant protocol than GnRH-a long protocol. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.80, 1.01], P = 0.08), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.77, 1.00], P = 0.05), live birth rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.74, 1.09], P = 0.27), miscarriage rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.98 [0.69, 1.40], P = 0.93), and cycle cancellation rate (OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.52, 1.44], P = 0.57) showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: GnRH-ant protocol substantially decreased the incidence of OHSS without influencing the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to GnRH-a long protocol among patients with normal ovarian reserve. Public Library of Science 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5402978/ /pubmed/28437434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175985 Text en © 2017 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Ruolin Lin, Shouren Wang, Yong Qian, Weiping Zhou, Liang Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparisons of GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparisons of gnrh antagonist protocol versus gnrh agonist long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5402978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28437434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangruolin comparisonsofgnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolinpatientswithnormalovarianreserveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linshouren comparisonsofgnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolinpatientswithnormalovarianreserveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyong comparisonsofgnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolinpatientswithnormalovarianreserveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qianweiping comparisonsofgnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolinpatientswithnormalovarianreserveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhouliang comparisonsofgnrhantagonistprotocolversusgnrhagonistlongprotocolinpatientswithnormalovarianreserveasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |