Cargando…

Myofilament function and body mass index

Body mass is reported to influence myocardial performance. Recent studies have emphasised the importance of negative inotropic adipocyte-derived factors and their impact on cardiac contractile function. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether body mass impact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bening, Constanze, Hamouda, Khaled, Schimmer, Christoph, Leyh, Rainier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.858
_version_ 1783231382812622848
author Bening, Constanze
Hamouda, Khaled
Schimmer, Christoph
Leyh, Rainier
author_facet Bening, Constanze
Hamouda, Khaled
Schimmer, Christoph
Leyh, Rainier
author_sort Bening, Constanze
collection PubMed
description Body mass is reported to influence myocardial performance. Recent studies have emphasised the importance of negative inotropic adipocyte-derived factors and their impact on cardiac contractile function. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether body mass impacts cardiac force development on the level of the contractile apparatus. We examined the influence of body mass index (BMI) (3 groups: group I >25, group II 25–30, group III >30) on the myocardial performance of skinned muscle fibres. Right atrial tissue preparations of 70 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass operation (CABG, 48 patients, group a) and aortic valve replacement (AVR, 22 patients, group b) were obtained. The fibres were exposed to a gradual increase in the calcium concentration, and the force values were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation (P<0.05 significant). A BMI >30 (group III) was associated with less force (mean force 1.58±0.1 mN, P=0.02, max force 2.24±0.17 mN, P=0.02 vs. group II (mean force 1.8±0.3 mN, P=0.04, max force 2.59±0.2 mN, P=0.03) and group I (mean force 1.8±0.1 mN, P=0,03, max force 2.62±0.3 mN, P=0.03). Dividing the groups in the post-surgical procedure, the impact of BMI on force development in group III was more intense in the CABG group compared to the AVR group: 2.0±0.2 mN vs. 2.4±0.1 mN, P=0.04. In accordance with the literature, a BMI >30 is associated with reduced force capacities. Additionally, the underlying cardiac disease may aggravate the impact of weight on cardiac force. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of this experimental observation and the potential consequences for the treatment of cardiac function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5403173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54031732017-04-27 Myofilament function and body mass index Bening, Constanze Hamouda, Khaled Schimmer, Christoph Leyh, Rainier Biomed Rep Articles Body mass is reported to influence myocardial performance. Recent studies have emphasised the importance of negative inotropic adipocyte-derived factors and their impact on cardiac contractile function. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether body mass impacts cardiac force development on the level of the contractile apparatus. We examined the influence of body mass index (BMI) (3 groups: group I >25, group II 25–30, group III >30) on the myocardial performance of skinned muscle fibres. Right atrial tissue preparations of 70 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass operation (CABG, 48 patients, group a) and aortic valve replacement (AVR, 22 patients, group b) were obtained. The fibres were exposed to a gradual increase in the calcium concentration, and the force values were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation (P<0.05 significant). A BMI >30 (group III) was associated with less force (mean force 1.58±0.1 mN, P=0.02, max force 2.24±0.17 mN, P=0.02 vs. group II (mean force 1.8±0.3 mN, P=0.04, max force 2.59±0.2 mN, P=0.03) and group I (mean force 1.8±0.1 mN, P=0,03, max force 2.62±0.3 mN, P=0.03). Dividing the groups in the post-surgical procedure, the impact of BMI on force development in group III was more intense in the CABG group compared to the AVR group: 2.0±0.2 mN vs. 2.4±0.1 mN, P=0.04. In accordance with the literature, a BMI >30 is associated with reduced force capacities. Additionally, the underlying cardiac disease may aggravate the impact of weight on cardiac force. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of this experimental observation and the potential consequences for the treatment of cardiac function. D.A. Spandidos 2017-03 2017-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5403173/ /pubmed/28451388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.858 Text en Copyright: © Bening et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Bening, Constanze
Hamouda, Khaled
Schimmer, Christoph
Leyh, Rainier
Myofilament function and body mass index
title Myofilament function and body mass index
title_full Myofilament function and body mass index
title_fullStr Myofilament function and body mass index
title_full_unstemmed Myofilament function and body mass index
title_short Myofilament function and body mass index
title_sort myofilament function and body mass index
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.858
work_keys_str_mv AT beningconstanze myofilamentfunctionandbodymassindex
AT hamoudakhaled myofilamentfunctionandbodymassindex
AT schimmerchristoph myofilamentfunctionandbodymassindex
AT leyhrainier myofilamentfunctionandbodymassindex