Cargando…

A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects

PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy males. METHODS: In this single-blind study, 157 healthy males were randomized 1:1:1 to a single 6 mg/kg intravenous infusion of ABP 980, FDA-licensed trastuzumab [trastuzumab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanes, Vladimir, Chow, Vincent, Zhang, Nan, Markus, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3286-9
_version_ 1783231465391128576
author Hanes, Vladimir
Chow, Vincent
Zhang, Nan
Markus, Richard
author_facet Hanes, Vladimir
Chow, Vincent
Zhang, Nan
Markus, Richard
author_sort Hanes, Vladimir
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy males. METHODS: In this single-blind study, 157 healthy males were randomized 1:1:1 to a single 6 mg/kg intravenous infusion of ABP 980, FDA-licensed trastuzumab [trastuzumab (US)], or EU-authorized trastuzumab [trastuzumab (EU)]. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(inf)) and maximum observed serum concentration (C (max)). To establish equivalence, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for C (max) and AUC(inf) had to be within the equivalence criteria of 0.80–1.25. RESULTS: The GMRs and 90% CIs for C (max) and AUC(inf), respectively, were: 1.04 (0.99–1.08) and 1.06 (1.00–1.12) for ABP 980 versus trastuzumab (US); 0.99 (0.95–1.03) and 1.00 (0.95–1.06) for ABP 980 versus trastuzumab (EU); and 0.96 (0.92–1.00) and 0.95 (0.90–1.01) for trastuzumab (US) versus trastuzumab (EU). All comparisons were within the equivalence criteria of 0.80–1.25. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 84.0, 75.0, and 78.2 of subjects in the ABP 980, trastuzumab (US), and trastuzumab (EU) groups, respectively. There were no deaths or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation and no binding or neutralizing anti-drug anti-bodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the PK similarity of ABP 980 to both trastuzumab (US) and trastuzumab (EU), and of trastuzumab (US) to trastuzumab (EU). No differences in safety and tolerability between treatments were noted; no subject tested positive for binding anti-bodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5403841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54038412017-05-09 A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects Hanes, Vladimir Chow, Vincent Zhang, Nan Markus, Richard Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy males. METHODS: In this single-blind study, 157 healthy males were randomized 1:1:1 to a single 6 mg/kg intravenous infusion of ABP 980, FDA-licensed trastuzumab [trastuzumab (US)], or EU-authorized trastuzumab [trastuzumab (EU)]. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(inf)) and maximum observed serum concentration (C (max)). To establish equivalence, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for C (max) and AUC(inf) had to be within the equivalence criteria of 0.80–1.25. RESULTS: The GMRs and 90% CIs for C (max) and AUC(inf), respectively, were: 1.04 (0.99–1.08) and 1.06 (1.00–1.12) for ABP 980 versus trastuzumab (US); 0.99 (0.95–1.03) and 1.00 (0.95–1.06) for ABP 980 versus trastuzumab (EU); and 0.96 (0.92–1.00) and 0.95 (0.90–1.01) for trastuzumab (US) versus trastuzumab (EU). All comparisons were within the equivalence criteria of 0.80–1.25. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 84.0, 75.0, and 78.2 of subjects in the ABP 980, trastuzumab (US), and trastuzumab (EU) groups, respectively. There were no deaths or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation and no binding or neutralizing anti-drug anti-bodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the PK similarity of ABP 980 to both trastuzumab (US) and trastuzumab (EU), and of trastuzumab (US) to trastuzumab (EU). No differences in safety and tolerability between treatments were noted; no subject tested positive for binding anti-bodies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5403841/ /pubmed/28341959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3286-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanes, Vladimir
Chow, Vincent
Zhang, Nan
Markus, Richard
A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title_full A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title_fullStr A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title_short A randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar ABP 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
title_sort randomized, single-blind, single-dose study evaluating the pharmacokinetic equivalence of proposed biosimilar abp 980 and trastuzumab in healthy male subjects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3286-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hanesvladimir arandomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT chowvincent arandomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT zhangnan arandomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT markusrichard arandomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT hanesvladimir randomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT chowvincent randomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT zhangnan randomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects
AT markusrichard randomizedsingleblindsingledosestudyevaluatingthepharmacokineticequivalenceofproposedbiosimilarabp980andtrastuzumabinhealthymalesubjects