Cargando…

Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)

The need for evidence to inform nutrition program design and implementation has long been recognized, yet the generation and use of evidence for program decision making has lagged. The results of the coverage surveys reported in this supplement highlight some of the strengths and areas for improveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neufeld, Lynnette M, Baker, Shawn, Garrett, Greg S, Haddad, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.246157
_version_ 1783231553353023488
author Neufeld, Lynnette M
Baker, Shawn
Garrett, Greg S
Haddad, Lawrence
author_facet Neufeld, Lynnette M
Baker, Shawn
Garrett, Greg S
Haddad, Lawrence
author_sort Neufeld, Lynnette M
collection PubMed
description The need for evidence to inform nutrition program design and implementation has long been recognized, yet the generation and use of evidence for program decision making has lagged. The results of the coverage surveys reported in this supplement highlight some of the strengths and areas for improvement of current population-based (i.e., staple foods and condiments) and targeted (e.g., foods for infants and young children) fortification programs. Among other topics, the results identify a few striking successful fortification programs whereby the majority of the food vehicle used is fortifiable and fortified, and coverage is equitable among those classified as vulnerable and not. Other programs have great potential based on very high use of a fortifiable food vehicle, including in most cases among the vulnerable, but that potential is not currently reached because of low compliance with fortification requirements. Programs were also identified whereby the food vehicle has limited potential to make public health contributions to micronutrient intake, given the low proportions of the population who consume the food vehicle in general or who consume the fortifiable food vehicle. Four key lessons were learned: 1) the potential for impact of food fortification depends on the appropriate choice of food fortification vehicle but also on the proportion of the food vehicle consumed that is fortifiable; 2) the design of fortification programs should be informed by the magnitude and distribution of inadequate intake and deficiency and consumption of fortifiable foods, and part of micronutrient deficiency control strategies to ensure coordination with other programs; 3) effective quality control of fortification levels in foods urgently needs strengthening, including the many governance and other policy factors that influence the capacity, resources, and commitment to do this; 4) periodic review of the assumptions related to dietary patterns that underpin food fortification is needed to ensure continual safe and impactful programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54042142017-06-08 Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3) Neufeld, Lynnette M Baker, Shawn Garrett, Greg S Haddad, Lawrence J Nutr Supplement—Assessing Coverage of Population-Based and Targeted Fortification Programs: Results and Implications for Program Improvement and Measuring Potential for Impact The need for evidence to inform nutrition program design and implementation has long been recognized, yet the generation and use of evidence for program decision making has lagged. The results of the coverage surveys reported in this supplement highlight some of the strengths and areas for improvement of current population-based (i.e., staple foods and condiments) and targeted (e.g., foods for infants and young children) fortification programs. Among other topics, the results identify a few striking successful fortification programs whereby the majority of the food vehicle used is fortifiable and fortified, and coverage is equitable among those classified as vulnerable and not. Other programs have great potential based on very high use of a fortifiable food vehicle, including in most cases among the vulnerable, but that potential is not currently reached because of low compliance with fortification requirements. Programs were also identified whereby the food vehicle has limited potential to make public health contributions to micronutrient intake, given the low proportions of the population who consume the food vehicle in general or who consume the fortifiable food vehicle. Four key lessons were learned: 1) the potential for impact of food fortification depends on the appropriate choice of food fortification vehicle but also on the proportion of the food vehicle consumed that is fortifiable; 2) the design of fortification programs should be informed by the magnitude and distribution of inadequate intake and deficiency and consumption of fortifiable foods, and part of micronutrient deficiency control strategies to ensure coordination with other programs; 3) effective quality control of fortification levels in foods urgently needs strengthening, including the many governance and other policy factors that influence the capacity, resources, and commitment to do this; 4) periodic review of the assumptions related to dietary patterns that underpin food fortification is needed to ensure continual safe and impactful programs. American Society for Nutrition 2017-05 2017-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5404214/ /pubmed/28404835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.246157 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Supplement—Assessing Coverage of Population-Based and Targeted Fortification Programs: Results and Implications for Program Improvement and Measuring Potential for Impact
Neufeld, Lynnette M
Baker, Shawn
Garrett, Greg S
Haddad, Lawrence
Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title_full Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title_fullStr Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title_full_unstemmed Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title_short Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation(1)(2)(3)
title_sort coverage and utilization in food fortification programs: critical and neglected areas of evaluation(1)(2)(3)
topic Supplement—Assessing Coverage of Population-Based and Targeted Fortification Programs: Results and Implications for Program Improvement and Measuring Potential for Impact
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28404835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.246157
work_keys_str_mv AT neufeldlynnettem coverageandutilizationinfoodfortificationprogramscriticalandneglectedareasofevaluation123
AT bakershawn coverageandutilizationinfoodfortificationprogramscriticalandneglectedareasofevaluation123
AT garrettgregs coverageandutilizationinfoodfortificationprogramscriticalandneglectedareasofevaluation123
AT haddadlawrence coverageandutilizationinfoodfortificationprogramscriticalandneglectedareasofevaluation123