Cargando…

Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises

BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schellenberg, Florian, Schmid, Nicole, Häberle, Ramona, Hörterer, Nicole, Taylor, William R., Lorenzetti, Silvio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0
_version_ 1783231580309815296
author Schellenberg, Florian
Schmid, Nicole
Häberle, Ramona
Hörterer, Nicole
Taylor, William R.
Lorenzetti, Silvio
author_facet Schellenberg, Florian
Schmid, Nicole
Häberle, Ramona
Hörterer, Nicole
Taylor, William R.
Lorenzetti, Silvio
author_sort Schellenberg, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on spine, hip and knee ranges of motion (RoMs), joint moments and muscle activity. METHODS: The kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity (EMG) of two execution types (BE(h): dynamic hip, BE(s): dynamic spine) and two versions (one-legged and two-legged) of BE were measured in 16 subjects. RoMs and external joint moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics approach and analysed with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Although lumbar spine flexion was observed in both execution types, thoracic spine flexion predominantly occurred during BE(s), whereas thoracic spine extension was observed during BE(h). Larger maximal back and hip moments were observed for BE(h) than for BE(s). The activity of the dorsal back and hip muscles, as observed using EMG, was increased for one-legged executions. CONCLUSION: To strengthen the hips and lower back, BE(h) seem to be more efficient due to the higher moments, with higher or similar RoMs in the hip and lower back. One-legged BE(s) seem to provide an effective training for the hamstrings and hip regions without subjecting the spine to excessive loading, possibly promoting this as an effective exercise during training and rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54043342017-04-27 Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises Schellenberg, Florian Schmid, Nicole Häberle, Ramona Hörterer, Nicole Taylor, William R. Lorenzetti, Silvio BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on spine, hip and knee ranges of motion (RoMs), joint moments and muscle activity. METHODS: The kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity (EMG) of two execution types (BE(h): dynamic hip, BE(s): dynamic spine) and two versions (one-legged and two-legged) of BE were measured in 16 subjects. RoMs and external joint moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics approach and analysed with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Although lumbar spine flexion was observed in both execution types, thoracic spine flexion predominantly occurred during BE(s), whereas thoracic spine extension was observed during BE(h). Larger maximal back and hip moments were observed for BE(h) than for BE(s). The activity of the dorsal back and hip muscles, as observed using EMG, was increased for one-legged executions. CONCLUSION: To strengthen the hips and lower back, BE(h) seem to be more efficient due to the higher moments, with higher or similar RoMs in the hip and lower back. One-legged BE(s) seem to provide an effective training for the hamstrings and hip regions without subjecting the spine to excessive loading, possibly promoting this as an effective exercise during training and rehabilitation. BioMed Central 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5404334/ /pubmed/28451436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schellenberg, Florian
Schmid, Nicole
Häberle, Ramona
Hörterer, Nicole
Taylor, William R.
Lorenzetti, Silvio
Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title_full Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title_fullStr Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title_full_unstemmed Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title_short Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
title_sort loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schellenbergflorian loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises
AT schmidnicole loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises
AT haberleramona loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises
AT horterernicole loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises
AT taylorwilliamr loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises
AT lorenzettisilvio loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises