Cargando…
Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises
BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0 |
_version_ | 1783231580309815296 |
---|---|
author | Schellenberg, Florian Schmid, Nicole Häberle, Ramona Hörterer, Nicole Taylor, William R. Lorenzetti, Silvio |
author_facet | Schellenberg, Florian Schmid, Nicole Häberle, Ramona Hörterer, Nicole Taylor, William R. Lorenzetti, Silvio |
author_sort | Schellenberg, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on spine, hip and knee ranges of motion (RoMs), joint moments and muscle activity. METHODS: The kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity (EMG) of two execution types (BE(h): dynamic hip, BE(s): dynamic spine) and two versions (one-legged and two-legged) of BE were measured in 16 subjects. RoMs and external joint moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics approach and analysed with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Although lumbar spine flexion was observed in both execution types, thoracic spine flexion predominantly occurred during BE(s), whereas thoracic spine extension was observed during BE(h). Larger maximal back and hip moments were observed for BE(h) than for BE(s). The activity of the dorsal back and hip muscles, as observed using EMG, was increased for one-legged executions. CONCLUSION: To strengthen the hips and lower back, BE(h) seem to be more efficient due to the higher moments, with higher or similar RoMs in the hip and lower back. One-legged BE(s) seem to provide an effective training for the hamstrings and hip regions without subjecting the spine to excessive loading, possibly promoting this as an effective exercise during training and rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54043342017-04-27 Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises Schellenberg, Florian Schmid, Nicole Häberle, Ramona Hörterer, Nicole Taylor, William R. Lorenzetti, Silvio BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Back extension (BE) is a strength exercise for training the dorsal trunk and hip muscles. To optimise training recommendations that avoid overloading and possible injury, the aim of this study was to determine the loading conditions and the influence of different execution forms of BE on spine, hip and knee ranges of motion (RoMs), joint moments and muscle activity. METHODS: The kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity (EMG) of two execution types (BE(h): dynamic hip, BE(s): dynamic spine) and two versions (one-legged and two-legged) of BE were measured in 16 subjects. RoMs and external joint moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics approach and analysed with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Although lumbar spine flexion was observed in both execution types, thoracic spine flexion predominantly occurred during BE(s), whereas thoracic spine extension was observed during BE(h). Larger maximal back and hip moments were observed for BE(h) than for BE(s). The activity of the dorsal back and hip muscles, as observed using EMG, was increased for one-legged executions. CONCLUSION: To strengthen the hips and lower back, BE(h) seem to be more efficient due to the higher moments, with higher or similar RoMs in the hip and lower back. One-legged BE(s) seem to provide an effective training for the hamstrings and hip regions without subjecting the spine to excessive loading, possibly promoting this as an effective exercise during training and rehabilitation. BioMed Central 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5404334/ /pubmed/28451436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schellenberg, Florian Schmid, Nicole Häberle, Ramona Hörterer, Nicole Taylor, William R. Lorenzetti, Silvio Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title | Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title_full | Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title_fullStr | Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title_full_unstemmed | Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title_short | Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
title_sort | loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schellenbergflorian loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises AT schmidnicole loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises AT haberleramona loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises AT horterernicole loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises AT taylorwilliamr loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises AT lorenzettisilvio loadingconditionsinthespinehipandkneeduringdifferentexecutionsofbackextensionexercises |