Cargando…

A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zorowitz, Richard D., Wein, Theodore H., Dunning, Kari, Deltombe, Thierry, Olver, John H., Davé, Shashank J., Dimyan, Michael A., Kelemen, John, Pagan, Fernando L., Evans, Christopher J., Gillard, Patrick J., Kissela, Brett M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605
_version_ 1783231586704031744
author Zorowitz, Richard D.
Wein, Theodore H.
Dunning, Kari
Deltombe, Thierry
Olver, John H.
Davé, Shashank J.
Dimyan, Michael A.
Kelemen, John
Pagan, Fernando L.
Evans, Christopher J.
Gillard, Patrick J.
Kissela, Brett M.
author_facet Zorowitz, Richard D.
Wein, Theodore H.
Dunning, Kari
Deltombe, Thierry
Olver, John H.
Davé, Shashank J.
Dimyan, Michael A.
Kelemen, John
Pagan, Fernando L.
Evans, Christopher J.
Gillard, Patrick J.
Kissela, Brett M.
author_sort Zorowitz, Richard D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a screening tool designed to identify spasticity symptoms and impact on daily function and sleep. Spasticity expert panelists evaluated items pooled from existing questionnaires to gain consensus on the screening tool content. The study also included cognitive interviews of 20 patients with varying spasticity etiologies to determine if the draft screening tool was understandable and relevant to patients with spasticity. RESULTS: The Delphi panel reached an initial consensus on 21 of 47 items for the screening tool and determined that the tool should have no more than 11 to 15 items and a 1-month recall period for symptom and impact items. After 2 rounds of review, 13 items were selected and modified by the expert panelists. Most patients (n = 16 [80%]) completed the cognitive interview and interpreted the items as intended. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of a Delphi panel and patient interviews, a 13-item spasticity screening tool was developed that will be practical and easy to use in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54043952017-04-27 A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment Zorowitz, Richard D. Wein, Theodore H. Dunning, Kari Deltombe, Thierry Olver, John H. Davé, Shashank J. Dimyan, Michael A. Kelemen, John Pagan, Fernando L. Evans, Christopher J. Gillard, Patrick J. Kissela, Brett M. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Original Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a screening tool designed to identify spasticity symptoms and impact on daily function and sleep. Spasticity expert panelists evaluated items pooled from existing questionnaires to gain consensus on the screening tool content. The study also included cognitive interviews of 20 patients with varying spasticity etiologies to determine if the draft screening tool was understandable and relevant to patients with spasticity. RESULTS: The Delphi panel reached an initial consensus on 21 of 47 items for the screening tool and determined that the tool should have no more than 11 to 15 items and a 1-month recall period for symptom and impact items. After 2 rounds of review, 13 items were selected and modified by the expert panelists. Most patients (n = 16 [80%]) completed the cognitive interview and interpreted the items as intended. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of a Delphi panel and patient interviews, a 13-item spasticity screening tool was developed that will be practical and easy to use in routine clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-05 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5404395/ /pubmed/27552355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Zorowitz, Richard D.
Wein, Theodore H.
Dunning, Kari
Deltombe, Thierry
Olver, John H.
Davé, Shashank J.
Dimyan, Michael A.
Kelemen, John
Pagan, Fernando L.
Evans, Christopher J.
Gillard, Patrick J.
Kissela, Brett M.
A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title_full A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title_fullStr A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title_full_unstemmed A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title_short A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
title_sort screening tool to identify spasticity in need of treatment
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605
work_keys_str_mv AT zorowitzrichardd ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT weintheodoreh ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT dunningkari ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT deltombethierry ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT olverjohnh ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT daveshashankj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT dimyanmichaela ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT kelemenjohn ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT paganfernandol ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT evanschristopherj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT gillardpatrickj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT kisselabrettm ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT zorowitzrichardd screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT weintheodoreh screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT dunningkari screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT deltombethierry screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT olverjohnh screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT daveshashankj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT dimyanmichaela screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT kelemenjohn screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT paganfernandol screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT evanschristopherj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT gillardpatrickj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment
AT kisselabrettm screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment