Cargando…
A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment
OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605 |
_version_ | 1783231586704031744 |
---|---|
author | Zorowitz, Richard D. Wein, Theodore H. Dunning, Kari Deltombe, Thierry Olver, John H. Davé, Shashank J. Dimyan, Michael A. Kelemen, John Pagan, Fernando L. Evans, Christopher J. Gillard, Patrick J. Kissela, Brett M. |
author_facet | Zorowitz, Richard D. Wein, Theodore H. Dunning, Kari Deltombe, Thierry Olver, John H. Davé, Shashank J. Dimyan, Michael A. Kelemen, John Pagan, Fernando L. Evans, Christopher J. Gillard, Patrick J. Kissela, Brett M. |
author_sort | Zorowitz, Richard D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a screening tool designed to identify spasticity symptoms and impact on daily function and sleep. Spasticity expert panelists evaluated items pooled from existing questionnaires to gain consensus on the screening tool content. The study also included cognitive interviews of 20 patients with varying spasticity etiologies to determine if the draft screening tool was understandable and relevant to patients with spasticity. RESULTS: The Delphi panel reached an initial consensus on 21 of 47 items for the screening tool and determined that the tool should have no more than 11 to 15 items and a 1-month recall period for symptom and impact items. After 2 rounds of review, 13 items were selected and modified by the expert panelists. Most patients (n = 16 [80%]) completed the cognitive interview and interpreted the items as intended. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of a Delphi panel and patient interviews, a 13-item spasticity screening tool was developed that will be practical and easy to use in routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54043952017-04-27 A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment Zorowitz, Richard D. Wein, Theodore H. Dunning, Kari Deltombe, Thierry Olver, John H. Davé, Shashank J. Dimyan, Michael A. Kelemen, John Pagan, Fernando L. Evans, Christopher J. Gillard, Patrick J. Kissela, Brett M. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Original Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinically useful patient-reported screening tool for health care providers to identify patients with spasticity in need of treatment regardless of etiology. DESIGN: Eleven spasticity experts participated in a modified Delphi panel and reviewed and revised 2 iterations of a screening tool designed to identify spasticity symptoms and impact on daily function and sleep. Spasticity expert panelists evaluated items pooled from existing questionnaires to gain consensus on the screening tool content. The study also included cognitive interviews of 20 patients with varying spasticity etiologies to determine if the draft screening tool was understandable and relevant to patients with spasticity. RESULTS: The Delphi panel reached an initial consensus on 21 of 47 items for the screening tool and determined that the tool should have no more than 11 to 15 items and a 1-month recall period for symptom and impact items. After 2 rounds of review, 13 items were selected and modified by the expert panelists. Most patients (n = 16 [80%]) completed the cognitive interview and interpreted the items as intended. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of a Delphi panel and patient interviews, a 13-item spasticity screening tool was developed that will be practical and easy to use in routine clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-05 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5404395/ /pubmed/27552355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Zorowitz, Richard D. Wein, Theodore H. Dunning, Kari Deltombe, Thierry Olver, John H. Davé, Shashank J. Dimyan, Michael A. Kelemen, John Pagan, Fernando L. Evans, Christopher J. Gillard, Patrick J. Kissela, Brett M. A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title | A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title_full | A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title_fullStr | A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title_short | A Screening Tool to Identify Spasticity in Need of Treatment |
title_sort | screening tool to identify spasticity in need of treatment |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zorowitzrichardd ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT weintheodoreh ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT dunningkari ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT deltombethierry ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT olverjohnh ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT daveshashankj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT dimyanmichaela ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT kelemenjohn ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT paganfernandol ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT evanschristopherj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT gillardpatrickj ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT kisselabrettm ascreeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT zorowitzrichardd screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT weintheodoreh screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT dunningkari screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT deltombethierry screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT olverjohnh screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT daveshashankj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT dimyanmichaela screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT kelemenjohn screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT paganfernandol screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT evanschristopherj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT gillardpatrickj screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment AT kisselabrettm screeningtooltoidentifyspasticityinneedoftreatment |