Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Andrew R., Anand, Atul, Boeddinghaus, Jasper, Ferry, Amy V., Sandeman, Dennis, Adamson, Philip D., Andrews, Jack, Tan, Stephanie, Cheng, Sheun F., D’Souza, Michelle, Orme, Kate, Strachan, Fiona E., Nestelberger, Thomas, Twerenbold, Raphael, Badertscher, Patrick, Reichlin, Tobias, Gray, Alasdair, Shah, Anoop S.V., Mueller, Christian, Newby, David E., Mills, Nicholas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021
_version_ 1783231589514215424
author Chapman, Andrew R.
Anand, Atul
Boeddinghaus, Jasper
Ferry, Amy V.
Sandeman, Dennis
Adamson, Philip D.
Andrews, Jack
Tan, Stephanie
Cheng, Sheun F.
D’Souza, Michelle
Orme, Kate
Strachan, Fiona E.
Nestelberger, Thomas
Twerenbold, Raphael
Badertscher, Patrick
Reichlin, Tobias
Gray, Alasdair
Shah, Anoop S.V.
Mueller, Christian
Newby, David E.
Mills, Nicholas L.
author_facet Chapman, Andrew R.
Anand, Atul
Boeddinghaus, Jasper
Ferry, Amy V.
Sandeman, Dennis
Adamson, Philip D.
Andrews, Jack
Tan, Stephanie
Cheng, Sheun F.
D’Souza, Michelle
Orme, Kate
Strachan, Fiona E.
Nestelberger, Thomas
Twerenbold, Raphael
Badertscher, Patrick
Reichlin, Tobias
Gray, Alasdair
Shah, Anoop S.V.
Mueller, Christian
Newby, David E.
Mills, Nicholas L.
author_sort Chapman, Andrew R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify patients. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1218) underwent high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement at presentation and 3 and 6 or 12 hours. We compared the European Society of Cardiology pathway (<99th centile at presentation or at 3 hours if symptoms <6 hours) with a pathway developed in the High-STEACS study (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) population (<5 ng/L at presentation or change <3 ng/L and <99th centile at 3 hours). The primary outcome was a comparison of the negative predictive value of both pathways for index type 1 myocardial infarction or type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. We evaluated the primary outcome in prespecified subgroups stratified by age, sex, time of symptom onset, and known ischemic heart disease. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 15.7% (191 of 1218) patients. In those less than the 99th centile at presentation, the European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out myocardial infarction in 28.1% (342 of 1218) and 78.9% (961 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, respectively, missing 18 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 97.9%; 95% confidence interval, 96.9–98.7). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 40.7% (496 of 1218) and 74.2% (904 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, missing 2 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 99.5%; 95% confidence interval, 99.0–99.9; P<0.001 for comparison). The negative predictive value of the High-STEACS pathway was greater than the European Society of Cardiology pathway overall (P<0.001) and in all subgroups, including those presenting early or known to have ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the High-STEACS pathway incorporating low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations rules out myocardial infarction in more patients at presentation and misses 5-fold fewer index myocardial infarctions than guideline-approved pathways based exclusively on the 99th centile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54044062017-04-27 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction Chapman, Andrew R. Anand, Atul Boeddinghaus, Jasper Ferry, Amy V. Sandeman, Dennis Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack Tan, Stephanie Cheng, Sheun F. D’Souza, Michelle Orme, Kate Strachan, Fiona E. Nestelberger, Thomas Twerenbold, Raphael Badertscher, Patrick Reichlin, Tobias Gray, Alasdair Shah, Anoop S.V. Mueller, Christian Newby, David E. Mills, Nicholas L. Circulation Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify patients. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1218) underwent high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement at presentation and 3 and 6 or 12 hours. We compared the European Society of Cardiology pathway (<99th centile at presentation or at 3 hours if symptoms <6 hours) with a pathway developed in the High-STEACS study (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) population (<5 ng/L at presentation or change <3 ng/L and <99th centile at 3 hours). The primary outcome was a comparison of the negative predictive value of both pathways for index type 1 myocardial infarction or type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. We evaluated the primary outcome in prespecified subgroups stratified by age, sex, time of symptom onset, and known ischemic heart disease. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 15.7% (191 of 1218) patients. In those less than the 99th centile at presentation, the European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out myocardial infarction in 28.1% (342 of 1218) and 78.9% (961 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, respectively, missing 18 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 97.9%; 95% confidence interval, 96.9–98.7). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 40.7% (496 of 1218) and 74.2% (904 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, missing 2 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 99.5%; 95% confidence interval, 99.0–99.9; P<0.001 for comparison). The negative predictive value of the High-STEACS pathway was greater than the European Society of Cardiology pathway overall (P<0.001) and in all subgroups, including those presenting early or known to have ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the High-STEACS pathway incorporating low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations rules out myocardial infarction in more patients at presentation and misses 5-fold fewer index myocardial infarctions than guideline-approved pathways based exclusively on the 99th centile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-04-25 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5404406/ /pubmed/28034899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Chapman, Andrew R.
Anand, Atul
Boeddinghaus, Jasper
Ferry, Amy V.
Sandeman, Dennis
Adamson, Philip D.
Andrews, Jack
Tan, Stephanie
Cheng, Sheun F.
D’Souza, Michelle
Orme, Kate
Strachan, Fiona E.
Nestelberger, Thomas
Twerenbold, Raphael
Badertscher, Patrick
Reichlin, Tobias
Gray, Alasdair
Shah, Anoop S.V.
Mueller, Christian
Newby, David E.
Mills, Nicholas L.
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanandrewr comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT anandatul comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT boeddinghausjasper comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT ferryamyv comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT sandemandennis comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT adamsonphilipd comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT andrewsjack comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT tanstephanie comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chengsheunf comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT dsouzamichelle comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT ormekate comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT strachanfionae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT nestelbergerthomas comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT twerenboldraphael comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT badertscherpatrick comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT reichlintobias comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT grayalasdair comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT shahanoopsv comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT muellerchristian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT newbydavide comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction
AT millsnicholasl comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction