Cargando…
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021 |
_version_ | 1783231589514215424 |
---|---|
author | Chapman, Andrew R. Anand, Atul Boeddinghaus, Jasper Ferry, Amy V. Sandeman, Dennis Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack Tan, Stephanie Cheng, Sheun F. D’Souza, Michelle Orme, Kate Strachan, Fiona E. Nestelberger, Thomas Twerenbold, Raphael Badertscher, Patrick Reichlin, Tobias Gray, Alasdair Shah, Anoop S.V. Mueller, Christian Newby, David E. Mills, Nicholas L. |
author_facet | Chapman, Andrew R. Anand, Atul Boeddinghaus, Jasper Ferry, Amy V. Sandeman, Dennis Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack Tan, Stephanie Cheng, Sheun F. D’Souza, Michelle Orme, Kate Strachan, Fiona E. Nestelberger, Thomas Twerenbold, Raphael Badertscher, Patrick Reichlin, Tobias Gray, Alasdair Shah, Anoop S.V. Mueller, Christian Newby, David E. Mills, Nicholas L. |
author_sort | Chapman, Andrew R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify patients. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1218) underwent high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement at presentation and 3 and 6 or 12 hours. We compared the European Society of Cardiology pathway (<99th centile at presentation or at 3 hours if symptoms <6 hours) with a pathway developed in the High-STEACS study (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) population (<5 ng/L at presentation or change <3 ng/L and <99th centile at 3 hours). The primary outcome was a comparison of the negative predictive value of both pathways for index type 1 myocardial infarction or type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. We evaluated the primary outcome in prespecified subgroups stratified by age, sex, time of symptom onset, and known ischemic heart disease. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 15.7% (191 of 1218) patients. In those less than the 99th centile at presentation, the European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out myocardial infarction in 28.1% (342 of 1218) and 78.9% (961 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, respectively, missing 18 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 97.9%; 95% confidence interval, 96.9–98.7). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 40.7% (496 of 1218) and 74.2% (904 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, missing 2 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 99.5%; 95% confidence interval, 99.0–99.9; P<0.001 for comparison). The negative predictive value of the High-STEACS pathway was greater than the European Society of Cardiology pathway overall (P<0.001) and in all subgroups, including those presenting early or known to have ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the High-STEACS pathway incorporating low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations rules out myocardial infarction in more patients at presentation and misses 5-fold fewer index myocardial infarctions than guideline-approved pathways based exclusively on the 99th centile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54044062017-04-27 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction Chapman, Andrew R. Anand, Atul Boeddinghaus, Jasper Ferry, Amy V. Sandeman, Dennis Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack Tan, Stephanie Cheng, Sheun F. D’Souza, Michelle Orme, Kate Strachan, Fiona E. Nestelberger, Thomas Twerenbold, Raphael Badertscher, Patrick Reichlin, Tobias Gray, Alasdair Shah, Anoop S.V. Mueller, Christian Newby, David E. Mills, Nicholas L. Circulation Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We compared the European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathway with a pathway that incorporates lower cardiac troponin concentrations to risk stratify patients. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1218) underwent high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement at presentation and 3 and 6 or 12 hours. We compared the European Society of Cardiology pathway (<99th centile at presentation or at 3 hours if symptoms <6 hours) with a pathway developed in the High-STEACS study (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) population (<5 ng/L at presentation or change <3 ng/L and <99th centile at 3 hours). The primary outcome was a comparison of the negative predictive value of both pathways for index type 1 myocardial infarction or type 1 myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. We evaluated the primary outcome in prespecified subgroups stratified by age, sex, time of symptom onset, and known ischemic heart disease. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 15.7% (191 of 1218) patients. In those less than the 99th centile at presentation, the European Society of Cardiology pathway ruled out myocardial infarction in 28.1% (342 of 1218) and 78.9% (961 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, respectively, missing 18 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 97.9%; 95% confidence interval, 96.9–98.7). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 40.7% (496 of 1218) and 74.2% (904 of 1218) at presentation and 3 hours, missing 2 index and two 30-day events (negative predictive value, 99.5%; 95% confidence interval, 99.0–99.9; P<0.001 for comparison). The negative predictive value of the High-STEACS pathway was greater than the European Society of Cardiology pathway overall (P<0.001) and in all subgroups, including those presenting early or known to have ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the High-STEACS pathway incorporating low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations rules out myocardial infarction in more patients at presentation and misses 5-fold fewer index myocardial infarctions than guideline-approved pathways based exclusively on the 99th centile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-04-25 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5404406/ /pubmed/28034899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Chapman, Andrew R. Anand, Atul Boeddinghaus, Jasper Ferry, Amy V. Sandeman, Dennis Adamson, Philip D. Andrews, Jack Tan, Stephanie Cheng, Sheun F. D’Souza, Michelle Orme, Kate Strachan, Fiona E. Nestelberger, Thomas Twerenbold, Raphael Badertscher, Patrick Reichlin, Tobias Gray, Alasdair Shah, Anoop S.V. Mueller, Christian Newby, David E. Mills, Nicholas L. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of early rule-out pathways for acute myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28034899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapmanandrewr comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT anandatul comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT boeddinghausjasper comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT ferryamyv comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT sandemandennis comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT adamsonphilipd comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT andrewsjack comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT tanstephanie comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT chengsheunf comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT dsouzamichelle comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT ormekate comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT strachanfionae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT nestelbergerthomas comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT twerenboldraphael comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT badertscherpatrick comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT reichlintobias comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT grayalasdair comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT shahanoopsv comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT muellerchristian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT newbydavide comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction AT millsnicholasl comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofearlyruleoutpathwaysforacutemyocardialinfarction |