Cargando…

Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision

BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogata, Hisao, Sakamoto, Yoshiaki, Kishi, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256
_version_ 1783231596795527168
author Ogata, Hisao
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
Kishi, Kazuo
author_facet Ogata, Hisao
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
Kishi, Kazuo
author_sort Ogata, Hisao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and December 2011, the palateplasty was performed for 24 patients with cleft palate (median age, 12 months; range, 11–18 months). In the velum, a symmetrical intravelar veloplasty with mucosal Z-plasty was performed on both the nasal and oral sides. In the hard palate, instead of lateral relaxing incisions, a 1-line mucoperiosteal incision along the cleft margins was designed with subperiosteal undermining in the entire palatine bone. The palatal mucoperiosteum was sutured together in the middle of the cleft, and the cleft was directly closed without lateral relaxing incisions. The patients were monitored for 6 months to 1.6 years. RESULTS: None of the cases had issues concerning flap viability, and all palate repairs healed well. Postoperative results were satisfactory, without any complications such as dehiscence, perforation, or palatal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented in this article was effective, with successful palatal closure and without scar formation or mucosal defects along the alveolus. We conclude that minimum contracture of the hard palate was useful for not only mitigating adverse maxillary growth but also for orthodontics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54044412017-04-28 Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision Ogata, Hisao Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Kishi, Kazuo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and December 2011, the palateplasty was performed for 24 patients with cleft palate (median age, 12 months; range, 11–18 months). In the velum, a symmetrical intravelar veloplasty with mucosal Z-plasty was performed on both the nasal and oral sides. In the hard palate, instead of lateral relaxing incisions, a 1-line mucoperiosteal incision along the cleft margins was designed with subperiosteal undermining in the entire palatine bone. The palatal mucoperiosteum was sutured together in the middle of the cleft, and the cleft was directly closed without lateral relaxing incisions. The patients were monitored for 6 months to 1.6 years. RESULTS: None of the cases had issues concerning flap viability, and all palate repairs healed well. Postoperative results were satisfactory, without any complications such as dehiscence, perforation, or palatal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented in this article was effective, with successful palatal closure and without scar formation or mucosal defects along the alveolus. We conclude that minimum contracture of the hard palate was useful for not only mitigating adverse maxillary growth but also for orthodontics. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5404441/ /pubmed/28458970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ogata, Hisao
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
Kishi, Kazuo
Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title_full Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title_fullStr Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title_full_unstemmed Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title_short Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
title_sort cleft palate repair without lateral relaxing incision
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256
work_keys_str_mv AT ogatahisao cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision
AT sakamotoyoshiaki cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision
AT kishikazuo cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision