Cargando…
Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision
BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and D...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256 |
_version_ | 1783231596795527168 |
---|---|
author | Ogata, Hisao Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Kishi, Kazuo |
author_facet | Ogata, Hisao Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Kishi, Kazuo |
author_sort | Ogata, Hisao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and December 2011, the palateplasty was performed for 24 patients with cleft palate (median age, 12 months; range, 11–18 months). In the velum, a symmetrical intravelar veloplasty with mucosal Z-plasty was performed on both the nasal and oral sides. In the hard palate, instead of lateral relaxing incisions, a 1-line mucoperiosteal incision along the cleft margins was designed with subperiosteal undermining in the entire palatine bone. The palatal mucoperiosteum was sutured together in the middle of the cleft, and the cleft was directly closed without lateral relaxing incisions. The patients were monitored for 6 months to 1.6 years. RESULTS: None of the cases had issues concerning flap viability, and all palate repairs healed well. Postoperative results were satisfactory, without any complications such as dehiscence, perforation, or palatal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented in this article was effective, with successful palatal closure and without scar formation or mucosal defects along the alveolus. We conclude that minimum contracture of the hard palate was useful for not only mitigating adverse maxillary growth but also for orthodontics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54044412017-04-28 Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision Ogata, Hisao Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Kishi, Kazuo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The goals of successful palate repair include optimization of speech and feeding, avoidance of fistula formation, and mitigation of adverse maxillary growth. However, the effects of scar formation on maxillary growth have not been discussed in detail. METHODS: Between November 2010 and December 2011, the palateplasty was performed for 24 patients with cleft palate (median age, 12 months; range, 11–18 months). In the velum, a symmetrical intravelar veloplasty with mucosal Z-plasty was performed on both the nasal and oral sides. In the hard palate, instead of lateral relaxing incisions, a 1-line mucoperiosteal incision along the cleft margins was designed with subperiosteal undermining in the entire palatine bone. The palatal mucoperiosteum was sutured together in the middle of the cleft, and the cleft was directly closed without lateral relaxing incisions. The patients were monitored for 6 months to 1.6 years. RESULTS: None of the cases had issues concerning flap viability, and all palate repairs healed well. Postoperative results were satisfactory, without any complications such as dehiscence, perforation, or palatal fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented in this article was effective, with successful palatal closure and without scar formation or mucosal defects along the alveolus. We conclude that minimum contracture of the hard palate was useful for not only mitigating adverse maxillary growth but also for orthodontics. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5404441/ /pubmed/28458970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ogata, Hisao Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Kishi, Kazuo Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title | Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title_full | Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title_fullStr | Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title_full_unstemmed | Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title_short | Cleft Palate Repair without Lateral Relaxing Incision |
title_sort | cleft palate repair without lateral relaxing incision |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogatahisao cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision AT sakamotoyoshiaki cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision AT kishikazuo cleftpalaterepairwithoutlateralrelaxingincision |