Cargando…

Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers represent a particularly difficult disease process and remain a financially important entity. The underlying bone in advanced ulcers may harbor osteomyelitis. Radiologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis is confounded by chronic pressure and shear. We sought to determine the tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, James, Hartmann, Emily, Bentz, Michael L., Rao, Venkat K., Jee, Young, Rivedal, David, Poore, Samuel O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001263
_version_ 1783231598530920448
author McCarthy, James
Hartmann, Emily
Bentz, Michael L.
Rao, Venkat K.
Jee, Young
Rivedal, David
Poore, Samuel O.
author_facet McCarthy, James
Hartmann, Emily
Bentz, Michael L.
Rao, Venkat K.
Jee, Young
Rivedal, David
Poore, Samuel O.
author_sort McCarthy, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers represent a particularly difficult disease process and remain a financially important entity. The underlying bone in advanced ulcers may harbor osteomyelitis. Radiologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis is confounded by chronic pressure and shear. We sought to determine the test characteristics of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis compared to intraoperative bone culture. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing flap reconstruction who had preoperative MRI and intraoperative bone cultures between 1995 and 2015 was included. Recorded variables included age, sex, level of spinal cord injury and duration, preoperative MRI interpretation, microbiologic bone culture, smoking history, comorbidities, colostomy or urostomy, healing time, complications, length of stay, and discharge facility. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (175 flaps) were reconstructed, of which 41 patients (73 flaps) met inclusion criteria. Most patients were male (82.2%) with an average age of 50.4 years. Overall complication rate was 32.4% (n = 23) of which 34.7% (n = 8) were major. Positive and negative predictive MRI values were 84.6% and 16.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in healing time or complication rate in those with or without osteomyelitis. Intraoperative growth was associated with decreased postoperative complications (hazard ratio = 0.361; P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Test properties of MRI for diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with chronic pressure ulcers have limited ability to diagnose osteomyelitis and do not aid in surgical management, but do increase health-care expense. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis by intraoperative bone cultures does not predict inferior outcomes and paradoxically may be associated with fewer postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54044482017-04-28 Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management McCarthy, James Hartmann, Emily Bentz, Michael L. Rao, Venkat K. Jee, Young Rivedal, David Poore, Samuel O. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers represent a particularly difficult disease process and remain a financially important entity. The underlying bone in advanced ulcers may harbor osteomyelitis. Radiologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis is confounded by chronic pressure and shear. We sought to determine the test characteristics of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis compared to intraoperative bone culture. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing flap reconstruction who had preoperative MRI and intraoperative bone cultures between 1995 and 2015 was included. Recorded variables included age, sex, level of spinal cord injury and duration, preoperative MRI interpretation, microbiologic bone culture, smoking history, comorbidities, colostomy or urostomy, healing time, complications, length of stay, and discharge facility. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (175 flaps) were reconstructed, of which 41 patients (73 flaps) met inclusion criteria. Most patients were male (82.2%) with an average age of 50.4 years. Overall complication rate was 32.4% (n = 23) of which 34.7% (n = 8) were major. Positive and negative predictive MRI values were 84.6% and 16.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in healing time or complication rate in those with or without osteomyelitis. Intraoperative growth was associated with decreased postoperative complications (hazard ratio = 0.361; P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Test properties of MRI for diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with chronic pressure ulcers have limited ability to diagnose osteomyelitis and do not aid in surgical management, but do increase health-care expense. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis by intraoperative bone cultures does not predict inferior outcomes and paradoxically may be associated with fewer postoperative complications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5404448/ /pubmed/28458977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001263 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
McCarthy, James
Hartmann, Emily
Bentz, Michael L.
Rao, Venkat K.
Jee, Young
Rivedal, David
Poore, Samuel O.
Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title_full Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title_fullStr Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title_full_unstemmed Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title_short Seeing is Believing? Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pressure Ulcers: Implications for Surgical Management
title_sort seeing is believing? preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for pressure ulcers: implications for surgical management
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001263
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarthyjames seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT hartmannemily seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT bentzmichaell seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT raovenkatk seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT jeeyoung seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT rivedaldavid seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement
AT pooresamuelo seeingisbelievingpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingforpressureulcersimplicationsforsurgicalmanagement