Cargando…
Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery
BACKGROUND: Psychoactive drug use is on the rise in the United States, with plastic surgery patients a potentially susceptible group. This study aimed to determine the incidence of cosmetic and reconstructive patients in our practice taking psychoactive drugs and to compare those values with the nat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001282 |
_version_ | 1783231600466591744 |
---|---|
author | Davison, Steven P. Baglien, Brigit D. Hayes, Kylie D. |
author_facet | Davison, Steven P. Baglien, Brigit D. Hayes, Kylie D. |
author_sort | Davison, Steven P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Psychoactive drug use is on the rise in the United States, with plastic surgery patients a potentially susceptible group. This study aimed to determine the incidence of cosmetic and reconstructive patients in our practice taking psychoactive drugs and to compare those values with the national average. Furthermore, we discuss the patient safety concerns when patients withhold their medical history information over the course of their treatment. METHODS: Urban private plastic practice patients who underwent surgery in a closed practice from 2009 to 2016 were divided into cosmetic and reconstructive cohorts. Review for drug use was medical scripts, history, and Surescripts drug reporting. Extracted information includes age, race, procedure, psychoactive medications, and whether or not they stated a mental health diagnosis on their medical history forms. Only patients with complete records were included. RESULTS: A total of 830 patients were included in statistical analysis. Due to minimal cohort number, 70 men were excluded, as there were no comparative national data. Our analysis found that 33.6% cosmetic patients and 46.3% reconstructive patients used at least one psychoactive drug. CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant difference between psychoactive drug use at our practice compared with the general population and a significantly larger percentage of reconstructive patients taking drugs compared with the cosmetic cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54044562017-04-28 Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery Davison, Steven P. Baglien, Brigit D. Hayes, Kylie D. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Psychoactive drug use is on the rise in the United States, with plastic surgery patients a potentially susceptible group. This study aimed to determine the incidence of cosmetic and reconstructive patients in our practice taking psychoactive drugs and to compare those values with the national average. Furthermore, we discuss the patient safety concerns when patients withhold their medical history information over the course of their treatment. METHODS: Urban private plastic practice patients who underwent surgery in a closed practice from 2009 to 2016 were divided into cosmetic and reconstructive cohorts. Review for drug use was medical scripts, history, and Surescripts drug reporting. Extracted information includes age, race, procedure, psychoactive medications, and whether or not they stated a mental health diagnosis on their medical history forms. Only patients with complete records were included. RESULTS: A total of 830 patients were included in statistical analysis. Due to minimal cohort number, 70 men were excluded, as there were no comparative national data. Our analysis found that 33.6% cosmetic patients and 46.3% reconstructive patients used at least one psychoactive drug. CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant difference between psychoactive drug use at our practice compared with the general population and a significantly larger percentage of reconstructive patients taking drugs compared with the cosmetic cohort. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5404456/ /pubmed/28458985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001282 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Davison, Steven P. Baglien, Brigit D. Hayes, Kylie D. Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title | Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title_full | Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title_fullStr | Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title_short | Psychoactive Drugs in Plastic Surgery |
title_sort | psychoactive drugs in plastic surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisonstevenp psychoactivedrugsinplasticsurgery AT baglienbrigitd psychoactivedrugsinplasticsurgery AT hayeskylied psychoactivedrugsinplasticsurgery |