Cargando…
Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480119 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16 |
_version_ | 1783231623534215168 |
---|---|
author | Ekong, Donald Liu, Fang Brown, G. Thomas Ghosh, Arunima Fontelo, Paul |
author_facet | Ekong, Donald Liu, Fang Brown, G. Thomas Ghosh, Arunima Fontelo, Paul |
author_sort | Ekong, Donald |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use of two Android phones, an 8 megapixel (MP) and a 16 MP phone, for capturing microscopic images. METHOD: The Android phones were used to capture images and videos of a gastrointestinal biopsy teaching set of referred cases from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). The acquired images and videos were reviewed online by two pathologists for image quality, adequacy for diagnosis, usefulness of video overviews, and confidence in diagnosis, on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The results show higher means in a 5-point Likert scale for the 8 MP versus the 16 MP phone that were statistically significant in adequacy of images (4.0 vs. 3.75) for rendering diagnosis and for agreement with the reference diagnosis (2.33 vs. 2.07). Although the quality of images was found higher in the 16 MP phone (3.8 vs. 3.65), these were not statistically significant. Adding video images of the entire specimen was found to be useful for evaluating the slides (combined mean, 4.0). CONCLUSION: For telepathology and other image dependent practices in developing countries, Android phones could be a useful tool for capturing images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54046332017-05-05 Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology Ekong, Donald Liu, Fang Brown, G. Thomas Ghosh, Arunima Fontelo, Paul J Pathol Inform Technical Note BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use of two Android phones, an 8 megapixel (MP) and a 16 MP phone, for capturing microscopic images. METHOD: The Android phones were used to capture images and videos of a gastrointestinal biopsy teaching set of referred cases from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). The acquired images and videos were reviewed online by two pathologists for image quality, adequacy for diagnosis, usefulness of video overviews, and confidence in diagnosis, on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The results show higher means in a 5-point Likert scale for the 8 MP versus the 16 MP phone that were statistically significant in adequacy of images (4.0 vs. 3.75) for rendering diagnosis and for agreement with the reference diagnosis (2.33 vs. 2.07). Although the quality of images was found higher in the 16 MP phone (3.8 vs. 3.65), these were not statistically significant. Adding video images of the entire specimen was found to be useful for evaluating the slides (combined mean, 4.0). CONCLUSION: For telepathology and other image dependent practices in developing countries, Android phones could be a useful tool for capturing images. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5404633/ /pubmed/28480119 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Ekong, Donald Liu, Fang Brown, G. Thomas Ghosh, Arunima Fontelo, Paul Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title | Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title_full | Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title_short | Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology |
title_sort | evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480119 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ekongdonald evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology AT liufang evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology AT browngthomas evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology AT ghosharunima evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology AT fontelopaul evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology |