Cargando…

Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology

BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekong, Donald, Liu, Fang, Brown, G. Thomas, Ghosh, Arunima, Fontelo, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480119
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16
_version_ 1783231623534215168
author Ekong, Donald
Liu, Fang
Brown, G. Thomas
Ghosh, Arunima
Fontelo, Paul
author_facet Ekong, Donald
Liu, Fang
Brown, G. Thomas
Ghosh, Arunima
Fontelo, Paul
author_sort Ekong, Donald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use of two Android phones, an 8 megapixel (MP) and a 16 MP phone, for capturing microscopic images. METHOD: The Android phones were used to capture images and videos of a gastrointestinal biopsy teaching set of referred cases from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). The acquired images and videos were reviewed online by two pathologists for image quality, adequacy for diagnosis, usefulness of video overviews, and confidence in diagnosis, on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The results show higher means in a 5-point Likert scale for the 8 MP versus the 16 MP phone that were statistically significant in adequacy of images (4.0 vs. 3.75) for rendering diagnosis and for agreement with the reference diagnosis (2.33 vs. 2.07). Although the quality of images was found higher in the 16 MP phone (3.8 vs. 3.65), these were not statistically significant. Adding video images of the entire specimen was found to be useful for evaluating the slides (combined mean, 4.0). CONCLUSION: For telepathology and other image dependent practices in developing countries, Android phones could be a useful tool for capturing images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54046332017-05-05 Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology Ekong, Donald Liu, Fang Brown, G. Thomas Ghosh, Arunima Fontelo, Paul J Pathol Inform Technical Note BACKGROUND: In the year 2014, Android smartphones accounted for one-third of mobile connections globally but are predicted to increase to two-thirds by 2020. In developing countries, where teleconsultations can benefit health-care providers most, the ratio is even higher. This study compared the use of two Android phones, an 8 megapixel (MP) and a 16 MP phone, for capturing microscopic images. METHOD: The Android phones were used to capture images and videos of a gastrointestinal biopsy teaching set of referred cases from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). The acquired images and videos were reviewed online by two pathologists for image quality, adequacy for diagnosis, usefulness of video overviews, and confidence in diagnosis, on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The results show higher means in a 5-point Likert scale for the 8 MP versus the 16 MP phone that were statistically significant in adequacy of images (4.0 vs. 3.75) for rendering diagnosis and for agreement with the reference diagnosis (2.33 vs. 2.07). Although the quality of images was found higher in the 16 MP phone (3.8 vs. 3.65), these were not statistically significant. Adding video images of the entire specimen was found to be useful for evaluating the slides (combined mean, 4.0). CONCLUSION: For telepathology and other image dependent practices in developing countries, Android phones could be a useful tool for capturing images. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5404633/ /pubmed/28480119 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Ekong, Donald
Liu, Fang
Brown, G. Thomas
Ghosh, Arunima
Fontelo, Paul
Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title_full Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title_fullStr Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title_short Evaluation of Android Smartphones for Telepathology
title_sort evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480119
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_93_16
work_keys_str_mv AT ekongdonald evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology
AT liufang evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology
AT browngthomas evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology
AT ghosharunima evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology
AT fontelopaul evaluationofandroidsmartphonesfortelepathology